HM

If the BNP do badly maybe they should think about becoming a pressure group rather than a political party?

__________________

• Respice post te; hominem te esse memento!

kernow

Pressure group for who? No other non racist political party wants to leave the EU!

Like The Roman

Really? The BNP say they will have us out within 24 hours of them coming to power.

__________________
"Have you ever wondered, perhaps, why opinions which the majority of people quite naturally hold are, if anyone dares express them publicly, denounced as 'controversial, 'extremist', 'explosive', 'disgraceful', and overwhelmed with a violence and venom quite unknown to debate on mere political issues? It is because the whole power of the aggressor depends upon preventing people from seeing what is happening and from saying what they see. "

Enoch Powell

Tom Wilde

Kernow said "No other non racist political party wants to leave the EU!"

Actually, that isn't quite right, as the Liberal Party also wants us to leave the EU unless it can be massively reformed into an open, accountable and democratic free trade community. Can you see that happening?

HM

Except the Liberals, the PopDems, the Popular Alliance and all the other non-racist anti-EU parties!

But the BNP is racist and no decent Eurosceptic should tender their votes to extremists and authoritarians.

__________________

• Respice post te; hominem te esse memento!

kernow

But the Liberals (according to their website) want for me what is much worse than the EU, that is a "World Authority"!

a swansong 4 europe

Yawn, yawn, and so on.

Anyway, why should UKIP do badly? If it had the manpower and political effort it could quite easily save its deposit. Defeatism can breed defeatism, so surely it wouldn't take too much effort to achieve 5-10%, a position that any party claiming to be the "4th largest in the UK" should be easily able to manage?

Another 1-2% for UKIP would be highly embarrasing, as for the BNP though, I suspect they will put more propaganda effort into the fore and should at least beat all the others, that appears to be the trend.

blueblood1920

The BNP hasnt had a track record of bad results latley unlike UKIP. So the situation is a bit different.

HM

Really? Crewe and Nantwich's 0 votes isn't what I'd class as a good result. The BNP stands in a tiny minority of council votes, comes third and then starts to proclaim itself as a major new force. That's wrong and UKIP has more membership, more MPs and more MEPs than the BNP. UKIP are on the national stage; the BNP is in the national dunce corner.

__________________

• Respice post te; hominem te esse memento!

blueblood1920

Again you resort to insults, however crewe was stood because the party knew it would of been a waist of resources since the party was busy finishing off with the local elections which the BNP now has more than 100 councillors which is more than UKIP and also a GLA member which UKIP has 0. UKIP may have more MP's (1) but he was not elected for UKIP but is a defector and I believe he will lose his seat. MEP count will be dratically reduced in 2009, UKIP having so many was down to the media hype of Kilroy. BNP keep on beating UKIP in elections they both contest so its hardly a good reflection for UKIP. You are modest at spin, maybe you should think about sticking to being a school bully.