British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > Free England Party


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-07-2008, 03:21 AM   #31 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
BonnieDundee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Between Mallaig and Cornwall.
Posts: 2,809
BonnieDundee is just starting out
Default

The truth is the truth. Even your fellow English nats seemas to agree.
__________________
"It is poor civic hygiene to install technologies that could someday facilitate a police state."
-Bruce Schneier

How to Overthrow the System: brew your own beer; kick in your TV; build your own cabin and p*ss off front porch whenever you bloody well feel like it.
Edward Abbey

Leopold Kohr.
BonnieDundee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 17-07-2008, 05:47 PM   #32 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Tom Wilde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London.
Posts: 2,914
Tom Wilde is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Constantine View Post
The evidence for the pre Anglo-Saxon inhabiatants in 'England' being driven to the extreme West (Wales and Cornwall) and the North is overwhelming. It comes from the study of English (how few words there are that are not of Anglo-Saxon or later origin), the place names of England, written accounts in Anglo-Saxon histories and a mass of archaelogical evidence.
I'm with Unionist regarding the importance of this question to contemporary politics, (ie I think it is utterly irrelevant). However, for the sake of accuracy I just want to point out that there are many pre Anglo-Saxon placenames in England. Most settlement names are Anglo-Saxon or later (though there are also quite a few older ones, like London and Dover), but the majority of river names in England are pre-Saxon. This is overwhelmingly the case in the west of England, but even in eastern England there are lots and lots of Celtic river names.
Tom Wilde is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2008, 07:04 PM   #33 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,924
cassie is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Constantine View Post
It seems to me the most obvious commonsense to wish to have one's cake and to eat it... who would not want to do this?

Usually someone who is unprincipled!



______________________
cassie is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2008, 07:13 PM   #34 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,924
cassie is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Wilde View Post
I'm with Unionist regarding the importance of this question to contemporary politics, (ie I think it is utterly irrelevant). However, for the sake of accuracy I just want to point out that there are many pre Anglo-Saxon placenames in England. Most settlement names are Anglo-Saxon or later (though there are also quite a few older ones, like London and Dover), but the majority of river names in England are pre-Saxon. This is overwhelmingly the case in the west of England, but even in eastern England there are lots and lots of Celtic river names.
In general, it is usually wise to avoid absolutes. Therefore, whilst I tend to agree, I think it is largely but not entirely irrelevant.

A problem with many English nationalists seeking constitutional reform, is getting the issues enmeshed in considerations of racial and ethnic origins. Neither the Scots nor the Welsh were faced with such questions when they were invited to have bodies with devolved powers. It suits our opponents to convey the impression that English nationalism is always inextricably racial and ethnic.

To my mind, threads of this kind tend to harm the cause of constitutional reform for England.


___________________
cassie is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-07-2008, 07:41 PM   #35 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,438
22ANDUK is just starting out
Default

Tricky thing though. I guess I am British and English...

However, I was born in England, to an Irish mother, Cornish father, have a Norman surname and have blonde hair and blue eyes, my father and brother however have dark Roman features.

So I would consider myself and my family, therefore, to be Anglo-Saxon Celtic Viking Normans (or Norman Anglo-Saxon Celtic Vikings, or perhaps Viking Celtic Norman Anglo-Saxons and so on etc etc).

Granted the English may generally be of Anglo-Saxon descent, certainly our language, but blood-wise aren't we all a bit of a mixture? And what of recent 'third' generation immigrants? Can someone still be English and not Anglo-Saxon? All very interesting...what extent are we Anglo-Saxon?
22ANDUK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0