British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > Free England Party


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-05-2008, 10:17 AM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Richard the Lionheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 515
Party: Free England Party
Richard the Lionheart is just starting out
Default Free England Back Referendum

There is a lot of speculation with regard to a referendum on Scottish independence. Scottish Labour have challenged the SNP to bring forward their proposed date of 2010 for a referendum on independence.

This leads to several issues:

Why is it just about Scotland getting a say on membership of the union?

Why isn't the rest of the union getting a say?

How is it possible to leave the future of the union in the hands of a tiny minority of the population of the UK?

This is typical of the Labour government. They refuse point blank on any form of referendum for the English nation. 7 out of 9 "Euro-regions" have been denied a referendum on regional assemblies, No vote on the Lisbon Treaty, no vote on devolution like in the rest of the UK. Even Edinburgh got a referendum on congestion charges, unlike London, which had it imposed.

Whether you support independence or whether you support the union, it should be acknowledged that everyone should have a say on how they wished to be governed. We are the only party calling for a referendum for the rest of the union if one is given to Scotland. I think everybody, regardless of your political affiliation, should demand the right to vote in a referendum on anything which affects the composition of the union.

Should we sit back idly watching the Scots deliberate on the future of the union, or should we demand our say too?
__________________
The Free England Party - England's Premier Nationalist Party
www.freeengland.com
.....Serious about England
Richard the Lionheart is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 08-05-2008, 11:32 AM   #2 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,298
cassie is just starting out
Default

--------------------------------------


Full marks to you Richard for initiating this thread, especially in the way you have. I only hope the contributions to it will be thoughtful and informative, rather than mere sloganising.

My response is to say [lest anyone could possibly be in any doubt] is YES to the core question of "should we English demand our say too?"

As you know, I am not opposed to the continuance of the UK albeit in a constitutionally modified form, but I am opposed to being a category of citizen in a state which is singled out for adverse discrimination in a variety of ways, not least the restriction on being able to express opinions via the ballot box.

Being dahn sarf, you may not be as conscious of the discrimination against voters in England meted out during the 2004 elections for the EU Parliament. In the north of England, we had our longstanding right of voting in person in a Polling Booth arbitrarily removed by this nasty, Scots dominated government! We could only cast our votes by the dubious method of the Postal Vote. I can just see the 'heads of households' in places such as Bradford, Bury, Bolton etc gathering up all the Postal Votes for the female members of their households and kindly saving them the effort of completing and posting the documentation! Voters in the rest of England, Northern Ireland, Wales and, of course, Scotland were permitted to cast THEIR votes in the established way!

Controversially, it might also be argued that Scots are not fit to be allowed to pronounce upon such issues by themselves. Just look at the way Douglas Alexander cocked-up last year's elections in Scotland with thousands, if not tens of thousands, of ballot papers declared spoilt! More recently, Scots have presided over the Northern Rock fiasco made worse by putting political considerations above national interest instead of taking the decisive action they were driven to months later! I refer of course to Gordon Brown, Alistair Darling, Sir Callum McCarthy (Chairman of the Financial Services Board) and the Rt Hon John McFall MP (Chairman of the Commons Treasury Committee).

One could also cite the unbalanced way in which Scots in office have used their positions to make decisions in favour of Scottish interests whilst making other decisions adversely affecting England: the outcome of tram schemes proposed for Leeds and Edinburgh are an obvious case which springs to mind!

I have not forgotten the way in which the English as an ethnic group were the one group singled out to prevent them from recording their ethnic English origins in the 2001 Census! Of course if you wish to eradicate a nation, contemporary records of that nation should also be minimised, if not entirely eliminated!

Yes, the 85% of voters in England will ensure that the Scots arrive at a suitable answer!


-------------------------

Last edited by cassie; 08-05-2008 at 11:36 AM.
cassie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0