<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>British Democracy Forum - Immigration</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/</link>
		<description>Non-racist discussion zone for immigration.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:36:44 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>I stay Single Matka!</title>
			<link>http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124542&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:07:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[http://www.mojawyspa.co.uk/forum/21/47520/Zostane-samotna-matka 
 
 
---Quote--- 
I am 21 weeks pregnant and Unlike quick, she'll stay with corusia....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.mojawyspa.co.uk/forum/21/47520/Zostane-samotna-matka" target="_blank">http://www.mojawyspa.co.uk/forum/21/...-samotna-matka</a><br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			<font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">I am 21 weeks pregnant and Unlike quick, she'll stay with corusia. </span></font><font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">My guy started to drink, and drank agresywny.Kiedy was learned that the want to go away demolish entire apartment and beat me (thankfully small nothing had happened), I had to flee. </span></font><font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">I did not have to go back on things, I was afraid it so I went to the police to help me. </span></font><font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">It turned out that he is wanted by the Polish police and will be deported to a Polish prison for a few months. </span></font><font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">now I totally do not know what to do and how to go about arranged their affairs. </span></font><font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">Firstly, I have a question about whether this situation should take legal action to limit the rights of the child?</span></font><font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">Alimony? </span></font><font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">Secondly benefits. </span></font><font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">When, how and where can I claim it? And of course, what will I entitled to after the birth, I do not know whether the period of pregnancy covers have any? </span></font><font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">I should add that I am employed and operates continuously for more than two years. </span></font><font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">At the moment I live account at peace, but Starman August for social housing ... just do not know how long it takes, and the room is tiny and the room gets here dzidzia. </span></font><font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">dziekue the mountains very much for your help, because I feel it is really needed,</span></font>
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=53">Immigration</category>
			<dc:creator>shrewedpunter</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124542</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Arriving in the UK and pregnancy / child</title>
			<link>http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124541&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:00:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.mojawyspa.co.uk/forum/21/47522/Przyjazd-do-UK-i-ciazadziecko 
 
 
---Quote--- 
Hi,  
considering the girl to come to UK ... I have an...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.mojawyspa.co.uk/forum/21/47522/Przyjazd-do-UK-i-ciazadziecko" target="_blank">http://www.mojawyspa.co.uk/forum/21/...i-ciazadziecko</a><br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			<b><font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">Hi, </span></font><br />
<font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">considering the girl to come to UK ... I have an offer of work </span></font><br />
<font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">is also trying to have a baby ... how is the cost of health care delivery? whether she would have to work some time here if you want it free of charge as from it work? whether classified can skaldki are from other countries? would appreciate a hint</span></font></b><br />
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div><br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			<font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">There are two types of maternity statutory maternity pay and maternity allowance if she worked first specific amount of weeks and one week if I worked less employer has not admitted her right to maternity. </span></font><font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">The exact amount of weeks, but I do not remember all the info can be found on the HM Revenue</span></font>
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div><br />
Theads like these quickly get down to the nitty gritty  - &quot;<font color="#272727"><span style="font-family: verdana">statutory maternity pay&quot;</span></font></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=53">Immigration</category>
			<dc:creator>shrewedpunter</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124541</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Drive by shooting in Luton</title>
			<link>http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124539&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:57:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-22966909 
 
No race/ethnicity mentioned, so not even 'white' then I guess. 
 
 
---Quote---...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-22966909" target="_blank">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...herts-22966909</a><br />
<br />
No race/ethnicity mentioned, so not even 'white' then I guess.<br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			There have been 10 shootings in the town this year. The latest arrest takes the total for gun-related incidents to 37 since March.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div>Sounds like the Wild West down there!!</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=53">Immigration</category>
			<dc:creator>flamingreen</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124539</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Beheading - a British tradition restored!</title>
			<link>http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124530&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:40:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2344066/Man-20-appears-court-accused-beheading-18-year-old-woman-attacking-people-treated-hospital.html 
...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2344066/Man-20-appears-court-accused-beheading-18-year-old-woman-attacking-people-treated-hospital.html" target="_blank">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-hospital.html</a><br />
<br />
Just after the beheading in Woolwich another one in Sheffield.<br />
<br />
Ethnics chappies can do great work restoring our traditions. I don't know why people want to stop immigration.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=53">Immigration</category>
			<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124530</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Britain enriched with diversity: Pakistani first cousin marriages</title>
			<link>http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124529&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:44:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I came across this article on a blog whilst searching for something else. 
 
Now this medieval practice along with the consequences of such practice...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I came across this article on a blog whilst searching for something else.<br />
<br />
Now this medieval practice along with the consequences of such practice is shocking. Absolutely shocking!<br />
<br />
Now this was back in 2010. So I was wondering given the very fast growth of the immigrant and the immigrant descended population, if anyone had any up to date figures on this. The current cost to the tax payer and the strain on NHS resources and welfare agencies etc. Or anything about what the government is doing to stop it? [Joke]<br />
<br />
Only, like many of this sort of problem in this country, there is usually a burst of hot air from politicians and then everything just gets brushed under the carpet.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			<b>Britain enriched with diversity: Pakistani first cousin marriages inbreeding cause 33% of all birth defects in UK <br />
<br />
</b>
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div></div><div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			<div style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_NHmGTuCTevI/S7cbPJM1ZHI/AAAAAAAAAGg/0yLlCdiVJEM/s320/Pakistan-children-disabled-religion-poverty-37654.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</div>The Pakistani culture of marrying first cousins is the direct cause of  33 percent of all genetic birth defect children born in this country, a  statistic which inflicts massive costs on the NHS-supporting taxpayers  and social services, new figures have found.<br />
<br />
<br />
Official — and out-of-date — birth records show that at the last count  Pakistanis were responsible for 3 percent of the births in this country,  but make up 33 percent of the 15 to 20,000 children born each year with  genetic defects.<br />
<br />
In Bradford, 75 percent of Pakistanis are married to first cousins.  According to reports, the trend is also evident in Birmingham, where  figures show that one in ten of all children born to first cousins died  in childhood or suffered from a serious genetic disorder.<br />
<br />
Overall, half of all Pakistanis in Britain marry a first cousin. As a  result, they are 13 times more likely to produce children with genetic  disorders than the general population, according to the  Government-sponsored research.<br />
<br />
The figures will be officially released by Crossbench peer Baroness Ruth  Deech next week. She will call for the Government (i.e the taxpayers)  to launch a “campaign to warn migrants of the risks of marriages between  cousins.”<br />
<br />
Baroness Deech will warn that “such marriages can be a barrier to the  integration of minority communities and increases the risk of birth  defects in children.”<br />
<br />
In the speech, she will say that first cousin marriages are on the rise  and the practice is “at odds with freedom of choice, romantic love and  integration.”<br />
<br />
The practice of first cousin marriages is continuing because of  “financial reasons — either to settle debts or provide financial support  for relatives abroad; helping relatives to migrate to Britain or  wanting to provide a ‘ready-made’ family for an immigrant spouse.”<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, British taxpayers must shoulder the burden for this Third  World practice imported into Britain as a result of the continuing  immigration invasion. <br />
<br />
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div><div style="text-align: center;"><br />
</div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=53">Immigration</category>
			<dc:creator>Seymour Stilch</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124529</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BBC very quiet about this</title>
			<link>http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124503&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:03:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Undoubtedly its because it is 'Scottish' news...:rolleyes: 
 
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/407931/Scots-police-smash-two-large-paedophile-rings 
...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Undoubtedly its because it is 'Scottish' news...:rolleyes:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/407931/Scots-police-smash-two-large-paedophile-rings" target="_blank">http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/407...edophile-rings</a><br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			There are groups of foreign nationals involved in this and maybe respect for women isn’t seen as being a high priority in their country of origin<br />
A police source
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=53">Immigration</category>
			<dc:creator>flamingreen</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124503</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>How has immigration changed Southampton?</title>
			<link>http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124491&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 01:03:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3by6h8kQ7Q 
 
Cherry Picked the nice friendly Polish guy :)</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<iframe class="restrain" title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="390" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/e3by6h8kQ7Q?wmode=opaque" frameborder="0"></iframe>
<br />
<br />
Cherry Picked the nice friendly Polish guy :)</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=53">Immigration</category>
			<dc:creator>shrewedpunter</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124491</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rogues Gallery</title>
			<link>http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124479&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:10:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Confirmation (if any were needed) that immigrants currently punch far above their weight in the criminality stakes: 
Not many native Brits in this...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Confirmation (if any were needed) that immigrants currently punch far above their weight in the criminality stakes:<br />
Not many native Brits in this bunch.<br />
<a href="http://www.london24.com/news/crime/newham_s_most_wanted_1_1666619?id=13&amp;storyId=1.1666621.1351166951" target="_blank">http://www.london24.com/news/crime/newham_s_most_wanted_1_1666619?id=13&amp;storyId=1.166  6621.135116695<br />
<br />
<br />
</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=53">Immigration</category>
			<dc:creator>GinnyG</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124479</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Immigration and unemployment ?</title>
			<link>http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124454&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:00:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>What impact has mass immigration had on unEmployment? 
1 long term unemployment ? 
The IPPR think-tank said that in such a tough labour market, it is...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>What impact has mass immigration had on unEmployment?<br />
1 long term unemployment ?<br />
The IPPR think-tank said that in such a tough labour market, it is inevitable that many of the people who have lost their jobs in the last 12 months will struggle to find new ones and will join the ranks of the long-term unemployed.<br />
IPPR chief economist Tony Dolphin said: &quot;Long-term unemployment is the hidden crisis of the slowest ever economic recovery in the UK.<br />
<br />
<br />
As a general rule, the longer someone is unemployed, the less likely they are to ever return to work.<br />
&quot;Long-term unemployment increased by 32,000 - to 887,000 - and is now at its highest level since 1996. <br />
Long-term unemployment is placing a huge burden on the public purse in out-of-work benefits and unpaid taxes<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Long-term worklessness is now at its highest level for a generation... Today, there are more men and women - half a million - who have been out of work for over two years than at any time for sixteen years, in fact since the Labour government took office in May 1997.&quot;<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://What impact has mass immigration had on unEmployment? 1 long term unemployment ? The IPPR think-tank said that in such a tough labour market, it is inevitable that many of the people who have lost their jobs in the last 12 months will struggle to find new ones and will join the ranks of the long-term unemployed. IPPR chief economist Tony Dolphin said: &amp;quot;Long-term unemployment is the hidden crisis of the slowest ever economic recovery in the UK.As a general rule, the longer someone is unemployed, the less likely they are to ever return to work. &amp;quot;Long-term unemployment increased by 32,000 - to 887,000 - and is now at its highest level since 1996.Long-term unemployment is placing a huge burden on the public purse in out-of-work benefits and unpaid taxes Long-term worklessness is now at its highest level for a generation... Today, there are more men and women - half a million - who have been out of work for over two years than at any time for sixteen years, in fact since the Labour government took office in May 1997.&amp;quot;&#91;url]http://fullfact.org/sites/fullfact.org/files/miliband_1_0.png&#91;/url] If we look at the chart we see since 2004 there been a slow but steady increase up to its peake 887,000 but not reached the high level of 1993. The numbber of long term unemploment dramactally increased after 2008 reccesion .A separate report by Policy Exchange found that people aged 50 or above who lose their jobs are more likely to remain out of work for longer periods of time than other age groups.The group also found that older workers were still being discriminated against on the grounds of their age.Policy Exchange applied for more than 1,200 bar jobs and personal assistant positions as a 51-year-old and a 25-year-old. The responses showed a &amp;quot;huge bias&amp;quot; against the older workerThe 25-year-old received nearly 125% more positive responses to the bar job than the 51-year-old and 45% more positive responses to the personal assistant position.The migrantes into britain are generaly a younger age.They come to this country for easy life and claim benifits straight away?In 2008 the Statistics Commission 1.4 million workers born abroad had taken jobs in Britain since 1997, making up 81 per cent of the 1.7million new jobs for people of working ageBetwen July and september 2010 official figures indicate They show that only 100,000 of the 297,000 workers who began new post were native Brit. Read more: &#91;url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1348417/Foreigners-2-3-new-jobs-200k-vacancies-filled-born-overseas.html#ixzz2WNwM04zB&#91;/url] Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook &amp;quot;Of the roughly 1.8 million people from elsewhere in the EU of working age, about 5% are claiming out-of-work benefits.&amp;quot; Radio 4 Today Programme, March 25 2013 The most recent DWP statistics on foreign nationals claiming benefits was published over a year ago using data from February 2011. The report found that as of February 2011, over 5 and a half million people were claiming DWP working-age benefits. Of these 371,000 (6.4%) were estimated to have been non-UK nationals. Overall 16.6% of working age UK nationals were claiming a DWP working age benefit compared to 6.6% of working age non-UK nationals. So, based on data from National Insurance numbers, UK nationals are around two-and-a-half times as likely to be claiming working age benefits than non-UK nationals.&#91;url]http://statistics.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd1/adhoc_analysis/2012/nat_nino_regs.pdf&#91;/url]We have several sources there been a steady flow of Immigrants making up the Labour force and stats that U.k Citizens are more then twice has likely to claim DWP working age benefit Migrant workers are, on average, slightly younger than UK-born workers. Nearly 39% of foreign-born workers were aged between 25 and 35 years old in 2011, while less than 24% of UK-born workers were in that age group. However, a higher percentage of UK-born workers are among the youngest (aged 16-24) and oldest (aged 46-55)Employment gap between foreign-born and UK-born men has been narrowing A key indicator of labour market outcomes is the employment rate measuring the share of the employed in the total working-age population. Historically, employment rates of the foreign-born have, on average, been lower than those of the UK-born (Aldin et al. 2010). From 1993 to 2007, the employment rates for both, male and female migrants, was lower than the corresponding rates for the UK-born (Figure 2). However, since 2008 the employment rates of male migrants (76% for 2011) has been similar to that of UK-born males (75% for 2011), while those of female migrants (60% for 2011) has remained lower than that of UK-born females (70% for 2011). Employment rates vary between countries of origin: A8 migrants have higher employment rates The averages reported above mask potential variations in employment rates between different groups of migrants. In 2011 the employment rates of male workers from Australia (91%), the A8 countries (89%), and India (82%) were considerably higher than that of UK-born men (75%) (see Figure 3).In contrast, female migrants from some Asian countries, such as Pakistan (19%) and Bangladesh (25%), had significantly lower employment rates than UK-born females (70%) in 2011. Still, female workers coming from the A8 (76%) and Australia (77%) had higher employment rates than UK-born women. The Foreigners are taking all The JobsHas we see above Immigrants take up many jobs is this at the expence of U.K citizens? Foreign companies and multinationalsin Britain bringin their own people Businesses have told the Government not to cut the number of foreign staff coming to the UK via company transfers or risk damaging economic growth. Employers’ groups including the CBI and British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) have urged ministers not to reduce the number of migrant workers allowed into the UK via the so-called intra-company transfer (ICT) route, claiming it is vital for companies to access the specialist skills they need. New figures revealed businesses are being allowed to bring in almost 30,000 skilled non-EU workers a year to fill UK jobs under the ICT scheme, which is exempt from the annual immigration cap. The figure, which has risen by half in two years, dwarfs the 10,000 skilled workers who are being granted general visas and who do fall within the limit. It means that while an upper limit of 21,700 so-called “tier two” workers arriving in the country will easily be met, the total number when ICTs are included will be more than 40,000, around double the target. About two-thirds of ICTs were third-party contractors, and of those two thirds were from India. But Neil Carberry, CBI director for employment, said: “Intra-company transfers enable businesses to move their own staff to the UK for a limited period of time to fulfil a particular need, and they underpin a lot of investment in the UK.” Adam Marshall, policy director at the BCC, said ICTs are “essential to how multinational businesses operate”&#91;url]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/9111116/30000-foreign-workers-entered-UK-under-transfer-schemes.html&#91;/url] 2009 Labour Force Survey , &amp;quot;Employment levels by country of birth and nationality&amp;quot;.The figures show the number of UK and non-UK workers in the labour force and, within that, the number of EU workers with jobs in Britain. It is possible, therefore, to identify UK, EU and non-EU workers and to see how the picture is changing.The latest data show that, comparing the last quarter of 2009 with the same period in 2008, there are 76,000 fewer non-EU workers and 13,000 fewer EU workers employed in the UK. The EU change is not large enough to be statistically significant - in terms of a trend, the picture is stable.What does this mean for British workers - after all, fewer of them are employed too? Well, the proportion of all jobs occupied by UK citizens has risen - very slightly. At the end of 2008, 91.9% of jobs were held by Brits. At the end of 2009, it was 92.1%.Interestingly, while the proportion of jobs held by non-EU workers (the ones affected by the immigration points system) has fallen a tad - from 4.6% to 4.4% of British jobs, EU workers&#39; share of the jobs has gone up slightly - from 3.4% to 3.5%.&#91;url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/markeaston/uk_jobs_nationality.gif&#91;/url]But this is all a far cry from the story in 2002, before the big increases in immigration from central Europe and beyond kicked in. Back then, 95.1% of British jobs were held by British workers. Around 3% were held by non-EU citizens and 1.9% by EU migrants.Looking at 2009 again, one can see that all three groups lost jobs. UK workers lost the most jobs - 335,000 - but things look rather different when you analyse it in percentage terms.Among all UK workers, 1.3% lost their jobs in 2009. Among EU workers, 1.2% lost their jobs, a very similar figure. But among non-EU workers, 6% were made redundant in that year.&#91;url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/markeaston/2010/05/british_jobs_for_foreign_worke.html&#91;/url]Youth unemployment Foreign-born workers tend to be younger than their UK-born counterparts (Figure 1). In 2011 the average age of a UK-born worker was 40 compared to the foreign-born average age of 38. Nearly 39% of foreign-born workers were aged between 25 and 35 years old, while less than 24% of UK-born workers were in that age group. However, a higher percentage of UK-born workers are among the youngest (aged 16-24) and oldest (aged 46-55) demographic cohorts in the labour force.From 1999-2009, the percentage of foreign-born workers increased in the 25-35 year-old age group, and slightly decreased in the older group (aged 46 and over) – in contrast to the UK-born workforce. Since 2009 this pattern has been less clear. The trends for foreign-born women are very similar to those for men, except that the percentage of men aged 25-35 has always been slightly higher than that of women. About 77% of foreign-born workers who arrived in the UK between 2004 and 2011 are distributed in the two younger groups (17% in the 16-24 age group and 61% in the 25-35 age group). In contrast, the percentage of recent foreign-born workers in the older group is very small (around 1%)." target="_blank">http://fullfact.org/sites/fullfact.org/files/miliband_1_0.png</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
If we look at the chart we see since 2004 there been a slow but steady increase up to its peake 887,000 but not reached the high level of 1993.<br />
The numbber of long term unemploment dramactally increased after 2008 reccesion .<br />
<br />
<br />
A separate report by Policy Exchange found that people aged 50 or above who lose their jobs are more likely to remain out of work for longer periods of time than other age groups.<br />
<br />
<br />
The group also found that older workers were still being discriminated against on the grounds of their age.<br />
<br />
<br />
Policy Exchange applied for more than 1,200 bar jobs and personal assistant positions as a 51-year-old and a 25-year-old. The responses showed a &quot;huge bias&quot; against the older worker<br />
<br />
<br />
The 25-year-old received nearly 125% more positive responses to the bar job than the 51-year-old and 45% more positive responses to the personal assistant position.<br />
<br />
<br />
The migrantes into britain are generaly a younger age.<br />
<br />
<br />
They come to this country for easy life and claim benifits straight away?<br />
<br />
<br />
In 2008 the Statistics Commission 1.4 million workers born abroad had taken jobs in Britain since 1997, making up 81 per cent of the 1.7million new jobs for people of working age<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
 Betwen July and september 2010 official figures indicate They show that only 100,000 of the 297,000 workers who began new post were native Brit.<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1348417/Foreigners-2-3-new-jobs-200k-vacancies-filled-born-overseas.html#ixzz2WNwM04zB" target="_blank">Read more: <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1348417/Foreigners-2-3-new-jobs-200k-vacancies-filled-born-overseas.html#ixzz2WNwM04zB" target="_blank">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2WNwM04zB</a> </a><br />
<br />
<br />
&quot;Of the roughly 1.8 million people from elsewhere in the EU of working age, about 5% are claiming out-of-work benefits.&quot; Radio 4 Today Programme, March 25 2013<br />
The most recent DWP statistics on foreign nationals claiming benefits was published over a year ago using data from February 2011. The report found that as of February 2011, over 5 and a half million people were claiming DWP working-age benefits. Of these 371,000 (6.4%) were estimated to have been non-UK nationals.<br />
Overall 16.6% of working age UK nationals were claiming a DWP working age benefit compared to 6.6% of working age non-UK nationals. So, based on data from National Insurance numbers, UK nationals are around two-and-a-half times as likely to be claiming working age benefits than non-UK nationals.<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://statistics.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd1/adhoc_analysis/2012/nat_nino_regs.pdf" target="_blank">http://statistics.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd..._nino_regs.pdf</a><br />
<br />
<br />
We have several sources there been a steady flow of Immigrants making up the Labour force and stats that U.k Citizens are more then twice has likely to claim DWP working age benefit<br />
Migrant workers are, on average, slightly younger than UK-born workers. Nearly 39% of foreign-born workers were aged between 25 and 35 years old in 2011, while less than 24% of UK-born workers were in that age group. However, a higher percentage of UK-born workers are among the youngest (aged 16-24) and oldest (aged 46-55) <br />
Employment gap between foreign-born and UK-born men has been narrowing<br />
A key indicator of labour market outcomes is the employment rate measuring the share of the employed in the total working-age population. Historically, employment rates of the foreign-born have, on average, been lower than those of the UK-born (Aldin et al. 2010). From 1993 to 2007, the employment rates for both, male and female migrants, was lower than the corresponding rates for the UK-born (Figure 2). However, since 2008 the employment rates of male migrants (76% for 2011) has been similar to that of UK-born males (75% for 2011), while those of female migrants (60% for 2011) has remained lower than that of UK-born females (70% for 2011).<br />
Employment rates vary between countries of origin: A8 migrants have higher employment rates<br />
The averages reported above mask potential variations in employment rates between different groups of migrants. In 2011 the employment rates of male workers from Australia (91%), the A8 countries (89%), and India (82%) were considerably higher than that of UK-born men (75%) (see Figure 3).<br />
<br />
<br />
In contrast, female migrants from some Asian countries, such as Pakistan (19%) and Bangladesh (25%), had significantly lower employment rates than UK-born females (70%) in 2011. Still, female workers coming from the A8 (76%) and Australia (77%) had higher employment rates than UK-born women.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Foreigners are taking all The Jobs<br />
<br />
<br />
Has we see above Immigrants take up many jobs is this at the expence of U.K citizens?<br />
<br />
<br />
Foreign companies and multinationals  in Britain bring  in their own people <br />
<br />
<br />
Businesses have told the Government not to cut the number of foreign staff coming to the UK via company transfers or risk damaging economic growth.<br />
Employers’ groups including the CBI and British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) have urged ministers not to reduce the number of migrant workers allowed into the UK via the so-called intra-company transfer (ICT) route, claiming it is vital for companies to access the specialist skills they need.<br />
New figures revealed businesses are being allowed to bring in almost 30,000 skilled non-EU workers a year to fill UK jobs under the ICT scheme, which is exempt from the annual immigration cap.<br />
The figure, which has risen by half in two years, dwarfs the 10,000 skilled workers who are being granted general visas and who do fall within the limit.<br />
It means that while an upper limit of 21,700 so-called “tier two” workers arriving in the country will easily be met, the total number when ICTs are included will be more than 40,000, around double the target.<br />
About two-thirds of ICTs were third-party contractors, and of those two thirds were from India.<br />
But Neil Carberry, CBI director for employment, said: “Intra-company transfers enable businesses to move their own staff to the UK for a limited period of time to fulfil a particular need, and they underpin a lot of investment in the UK.”<br />
Adam Marshall, policy director at the BCC, said ICTs are “essential to how multinational businesses operate”<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/9111116/30000-foreign-workers-entered-UK-under-transfer-schemes.html" target="_blank">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...r-schemes.html</a><br />
<br />
<br />
 2009 Labour Force Survey , &quot;Employment levels by country of birth and nationality&quot;.<br />
<br />
<br />
The figures show the number of UK and non-UK workers in the labour force and, within that, the number of EU workers with jobs in Britain. It is possible, therefore, to identify UK, EU and non-EU workers and to see how the picture is changing.<br />
<br />
<br />
The latest data show that, comparing the last quarter of 2009 with the same period in 2008, there are 76,000 fewer non-EU workers and 13,000 fewer EU workers employed in the UK. The EU change is not large enough to be statistically significant - in terms of a trend, the picture is stable.<br />
<br />
<br />
What does this mean for British workers - after all, fewer of them are employed too? Well, the proportion of all jobs occupied by UK citizens has risen - very slightly. At the end of 2008, 91.9% of jobs were held by Brits. At the end of 2009, it was 92.1%.<br />
<br />
<br />
Interestingly, while the proportion of jobs held by non-EU workers (the ones affected by the immigration points system) has fallen a tad - from 4.6% to 4.4% of British jobs, EU workers' share of the jobs has gone up slightly - from 3.4% to 3.5%.<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/markeaston/uk_jobs_nationality.gif" target="_blank">http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereport...ationality.gif</a><br />
<br />
<br />
But this is all a far cry from the story in 2002, before the big increases in immigration from central Europe and beyond kicked in. Back then, 95.1% of British jobs were held by British workers. Around 3% were held by non-EU citizens and 1.9% by EU migrants.<br />
<br />
<br />
Looking at 2009 again, one can see that all three groups lost jobs. UK workers lost the most jobs - 335,000 - but things look rather different when you analyse it in percentage terms.<br />
<br />
<br />
Among all UK workers, 1.3% lost their jobs in 2009. Among EU workers, 1.2% lost their jobs, a very similar figure. But among non-EU workers, 6% were made redundant in that year.<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/markeaston/2010/05/british_jobs_for_foreign_worke.html" target="_blank">http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereport...ign_worke.html</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Youth unemployment<br />
Foreign-born workers tend to be younger than their UK-born counterparts (Figure 1). In 2011 the average age of a UK-born worker was 40 compared to the foreign-born average age of 38. Nearly 39% of foreign-born workers were aged between 25 and 35 years old, while less than 24% of UK-born workers were in that age group. However, a higher percentage of UK-born workers are among the youngest (aged 16-24) and oldest (aged 46-55) demographic cohorts in the labour force.<br />
<br />
<br />
From 1999-2009, the percentage of foreign-born workers increased in the 25-35 year-old age group, and slightly decreased in the older group (aged 46 and over) – in contrast to the UK-born workforce. Since 2009 this pattern has been less clear. The trends for foreign-born women are very similar to those for men, except that the percentage of men aged 25-35 has always been slightly higher than that of women. About 77% of foreign-born workers who arrived in the UK between 2004 and 2011 are distributed in the two younger groups (17% in the 16-24 age group and 61% in the 25-35 age group). In contrast, the percentage of recent foreign-born workers in the older group is very small (around 1%).</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=53">Immigration</category>
			<dc:creator>to the left</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124454</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Man held as four stabbed at mosque</title>
			<link>http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124446&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 09:36:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>A man has been arrested on suspicion of attempted murder after four people, including a policeman, were stabbed at a mosque in Birmingham. 
Officers...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>A man has been arrested on suspicion of attempted murder after four people, including a policeman, were stabbed at a mosque in Birmingham.<br />
Officers were called to the mosque on Washwood Heath Road in Ward End at about 23:00 BST on Saturday.<br />
<br />
West Midlands Police said three men were found with stab injuries.<br />
As police arrested the man, who is 32 years old, the officer was also wounded. All four are in a stable condition in hospital.<br />
<br />
The incident began during the final prayer session of the evening.<br />
Eyewitnesses report that a man of Somali appearance began attacking worshippers with a machete.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-22924456" target="_blank">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...ngham-22924456</a><br />
<br />
Give it a while and  Cally, alemcodon or Taffy will say the Somalian was a member of the   EDL.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=53">Immigration</category>
			<dc:creator>Francis Overdere</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124446</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Immigrants ruined the British economy - The Independent</title>
			<link>http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124443&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 08:22:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Immigrants ruined the British economy - The Independent 
...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Immigrants ruined the British economy - The Independent<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/have-you-heard-the-immigrants-ruined-britain-8609394.html" target="_blank">http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/...n-8609394.html</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=53">Immigration</category>
			<dc:creator>SteveUKIP</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124443</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Asylum seekers cost £1.5m a day</title>
			<link>http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124437&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:24:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The Home Office had to fork out £583million on 37,000 asylum claims, the Daily Express can reveal. 
Two out of three cases of people trying to stay...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The Home Office had to fork out £583million on 37,000 asylum claims, the Daily Express can reveal.<br />
Two out of three cases of people trying to stay in the UK were more than a year old and nearly 14,000 had waited at least three years, according to official figures.<br />
<br />
The money went on housing, cash support, legal bills and paperwork.<br />
But the total does not include asylum seekers’ legal aid bills, the cash spent on them by councils or the cost of a backlog of hundreds of thousands of other migration cases.<br />
<br />
Campaigners yesterday condemned the huge cost of would-be refugees – roughly £14,500 per case.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/407697/Asylum-seekers-cost-1-5m-a-day" target="_blank">http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/407...ost-1-5m-a-day</a><br />
<br />
Solution? Don't take any in and send those already here back. There are no genuine asylum seekers in this country. They have all passed through dozens of safe countries to get here.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=53">Immigration</category>
			<dc:creator>Francis Overdere</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124437</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sickening! No other country lets foreigners exploit its health system the way we do..</title>
			<link>http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124430&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 00:06:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>---Quote--- 
*Sickening! No other country lets foreigners exploit its health system the way we do... and a top surgeon says it could even bankrupt...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			<b><font size="3">Sickening! No other country lets foreigners exploit its health system the way we do... and a top surgeon says it could even bankrupt the NHS  </font></b><br />
<br />
Recently, David Cameron estimated  that the cost to the British taxpayer was £20million. Health Secretary  Jeremy Hunt said it was £200million. The truth is far more shocking. <br />
<br />
I  believe abuse of the NHS by health tourists is costing taxpayers  billions of pounds - and I will explain why. It happens because we  encourage the belief that our NHS is 'free at the point of use', and  because the Department of Health guidelines defining eligibility for  free care are so porous, ineffective, contradictory and difficult to  enforce that they can be easily breached by any patient motivated enough  to try. <br />
<br />
But first,  let us define the offenders. We are not referring to illegal immigrants,  nor to people who need Good Samaritan care of the kind you might expect  the NHS to provide after someone has suffered from an accident or an  unforeseen illness.<br />
 <br />
No, health tourists are people who  visit the country perfectly legally. They come into Britain, usually on a  visitor visa, with a pre-existing illness and their arrival in hospital  is premeditated: the very purpose of their visit is to access free NHS  care. <br />
<br />
Nor do they come  with trivial problems. It is specialist, expensive and  resource-intensive treatments that they are after. The most common  examples include complex pregnancies, cancer, HIV and renal dialysis. <br />
<br />
NHS  hospitals have overseas visitor officers whose job it is to identify  and charge patients who are not eligible for free care. <br />
<br />
And  Jeremy Hunt has based his figure of £200&#8201;million on the invoices which  these officers have sent to patients who have been treated by the NHS. <br />
<br />
But  the fact is that most health tourists are either invisible to the  overseas visitor officers or use loopholes in the regulations to get  round them.<br />
<br />
Which means  that, in the vast majority of cases, no charge is made and no invoice is  sent out. This means that the cost of their treatment does not appear  in Hunt's £200&#8201;million figure.  <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2341903/No-country-lets-foreigners-exploit-health-way-Health-tourism-threatening-bankrupt-NHS.html#ixzz2WKfVSPNK" target="_blank">Article </a>
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div>How long can this go on before the NHS totally collapses? Your children will be having their babies in the bedroom at this rate if you are not rich. We will regress to more primitive times at a time when we should be experiencing the most hi-tech medical treatment of any generation.<br />
<br />
Yet people still vote LibLabCon. It doesn't make sense.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=53">Immigration</category>
			<dc:creator>Seymour Stilch</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124430</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Road rage' attack in M25 fast lane]]></title>
			<link>http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124421&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-22921809 
 
I suspected as much before i clicked the story.. i was soon proven right.. as with most of my...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-22921809" target="_blank">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-22921809</a><br />
<br />
I suspected as much before i clicked the story.. i was soon proven right.. as with most of my suspicions <br />
<br />
 <br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			<font color="#333333"><span style="font-family: Arial">Mercedes is described as left-hand drive and foreign registered. There was a female passenger in the vehicle</span></font>
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=53">Immigration</category>
			<dc:creator>shrewedpunter</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124421</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Worth every penny...</title>
			<link>http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124418&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:12:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Sickening! No other country lets foreigners exploit its health system the way we do... and a top surgeon says it could even bankrupt the NHS 
 
Read...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><font color="#000000"><span style="font-family: Arial">Sickening! No other country lets foreigners exploit its health system the way we do... and a top surgeon says it could even bankrupt the NHS</span></font><font color="#000000"><span style="font-family: Arial"><br />
<br />
Read more: <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2341903/No-country-lets-foreigners-exploit-health-way-Health-tourism-threatening-bankrupt-NHS.html#ixzz2WImp8C6G" target="_blank">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2WImp8C6G</a> <br />
<br />
</span></font><font color="#000000"><span style="font-family: Arial">Recently, David Cameron estimated that the cost to the British taxpayer was £20million. Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said it was £200million. The truth is far more shocking. <br />
</span></font><br />
<font color="#000000"><span style="font-family: Arial">I believe abuse of the NHS by health tourists is costing taxpayers billions of pounds - and I will explain why. It happens because we encourage the belief that our NHS is 'free at the point of use', and because the Department of Health guidelines defining eligibility for free care are so porous, ineffective, contradictory and difficult to enforce that they can be easily breached by any patient motivated enough to try. <br />
</span></font><br />
<font color="#000000"><span style="font-family: Arial">But first, let us define the offenders. We are not referring to illegal immigrants, nor to people who need Good Samaritan care of the kind you might expect the NHS to provide after someone has suffered from an accident or an unforeseen illness.</span></font><br />
<font color="#000000"><span style="font-family: Arial"><br />
<br />
<br />
</span></font></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=53">Immigration</category>
			<dc:creator>Sharon Ebanks</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=124418</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
