![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 10,193
Party: None
![]() |
I watched the Jamie Oliver 'Fowl Dinners' programme last night, during which he made reference to the fact that the EU is going to increase the density of birds allowed in the intensive barns from 17 to 19 per square metre.
This is a far cry from the positive publicity they had from pretending that they are pro-animal welfare by banning battery farming. The programme also revealed that this is also a lie - instead of small cages, the birds will have bigger cages with more birds in. Mildly better than before but still an absolutely unacceptable situation.
__________________
If you care about what's in your food and where it comes from, then get it labelled! Label My Food - http://www.labelmyfood.org.uk |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North East England
Posts: 6,814
Party: Popular Democrats
![]() |
I thought the 17 birds per sq metre was for the birds in the barns that are bred for their meat,not for their eggs.
The repeat of the HF.Wittingstall programme is on now,from 5-35pm with these birds in it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 10,193
Party: None
![]() |
Quote:
I was trying to make the point, obviously not very clearly, that the EU tried to pretend that it was pro animal welfare by banning battery farming, for eggs, across the EU. However, this simply isn't true - they have just changed the caging sizes and conditions marginally. At the same time they are also making conditions worse for the bred-for-meat chickens kept in barns.
__________________
If you care about what's in your food and where it comes from, then get it labelled! Label My Food - http://www.labelmyfood.org.uk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
![]() |
Quote:
If the EU were seriously concerned about the horror of cruelty to animals it would not have proposed and implemented the REACH Directive - which forces manufacturers to chemically test many items on animals (testing which, in the majority of cases, does not need to be done because the research has already been carried out long ago). |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]