British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > European Union


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21-09-2005, 09:23 PM   #1 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default Liar Barroso says EU Constitution delayed

Pipsqueak Jose Manuel Barroso said on 21.9.2005 that the EU won’t have a constitution “for at least two or three years”. He further conceded that the “treaty” was not likely to be ratified soon.

“We must (still) convince citizens of the relevance of the EU by creating jobs, improving security and protecting the environment” stated Barroso. In other words – keep the whole rotten EU show on the road so he and the rest of the 39, 000 pampered EU staff can carrying on collecting their bloated salary cheques at the end of each month for doing *** all.

Barroso’s remarks are clearly designed to knock people off the scent. If he and the rest of the shower that is the EU Commission can persuade people that the EU Constitution is delayed – then the power-hungry EU hierarchy can get on with implementing all the key parts of the EU Constitution through other channels (re-naming certain projects that were included in the EU Constitution to reduce suspicion) - whilst the innocent public are looking the other way.

Barroso's comments are total guff. He can't wait for the British Presidency to end so he and his loony power-grabbing europhile colleagues can get on with "the project".

P.S. Barroso also referred (above) to “citizens”. Well, we’re Subjects in the UK. I don’t think Her Majesty will be too pleased to read of this talk from the EU of “citizens”. The people of the Monarchies such as the UK, Holland, Spain, Denmark and Luxemberg (deliberately spelt the English way) are not “citizens”. Perhaps Barroso – coming from a Republic (Portugal) and now working for another Republic (EU) is too thick to see the difference.

Source of Barroso’s remarks: as reported on BBC 1 Television, Ceefax at 9.15 pm on 21.9.2005, page 115 (analogue) “Votes (of French/Dutch Referendums) put EU Treaty on ice”
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 22-09-2005, 05:29 PM   #2 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Reading
Posts: 3,486
Biscuitman is just starting out
Default

It's going to make our task of gathering signatures harder if the public believe its gone away, which I think is partly the point of the statements coming out of Brussels - they don't want anybody else holding referendums.

40% of the public in a recent poll said they were no longer interested in a referendum as they didnt see the need.

Tucked up, as Arfur would say.
__________________
IF THE EU WAS THE ANSWER, IT MUST HAVE BEEN A STUPID QUESTION!
Biscuitman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0