+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2
FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Efforts to support global climate-change falls: Poll

  1. #11
    Trusted Member Besoeker is doing well Besoeker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    6,397

    Quote Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
    See post #7 (at the bottom).
    OK
    Last edited by youcanhandlethetruth; Yesterday at 07:57 PM. Reason: removed, clarified sentence

    is at the bottom.

  2. #12
    Uber Member youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,740

    Well yes, obviously you must be right Besoeker (by your own definition of the interpretation).
    Only 1's that don't know, are the genuine people thinking it's about others sharing their own ideas.

  3. #13
    Trusted Member Besoeker is doing well Besoeker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    6,397

    Quote Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
    Well yes, obviously you must be right Besoeker (by your own definition of the interpretation).
    A lie is a false statement with the intention of deceiving.
    Chambers and possibly others, not mine.
    Can you cite any specific post where, by that definition or any other, that I have lied?

  4. #14
    Uber Member youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,740

    According to my defintion I probably could yes.
    But I'm not wasting my time searching the forums and arguing the toss over defintions and meanings(that IMO you constantly seem to do at every opportunity) that are unlikely to ever be resolved.

    So technically my answer is no, if that's what you want to hear.

    Can I ask you a question - am I fair ?
    Only 1's that don't know, are the genuine people thinking it's about others sharing their own ideas.

  5. #15
    Trusted Member Besoeker is doing well Besoeker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    6,397

    Quote Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
    According to my defintion I probably could yes.
    But I'm not wasting my time searching the forums and arguing the toss over defintions and meanings.

    So technically my answer is no, if that's what you want to hear.
    It isn't a technicality. I invited you to cite any post where I have lied.
    "A lie is a false statement with the intention of deceiving."
    It's neither my definition nor yours. It's a dictionary definition so maybe we could/should consider that to be objective.

    On that basis, which most reasonable would consider to be fair, I again invite you to cite any post where I have lied. If you can't, you should remove my name from your pecking order.

    And then we'll see if you're fair.

  6. #16
    Uber Member youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,740

    Are you still blithering on ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Besoeker View Post
    I again invite you to cite any post where I have lied. If you can't, you should remove my name from your pecking order.
    Ok let's do it.

    You stated:
    Quote Originally Posted by Besoeker View Post
    It's neither my definition nor yours. It's a dictionary definition so maybe we could/should consider that to be objective.
    It's not a dictionary defintion Besoeker - many words and sentences have multiple definitions or meanings.
    Do they not ?

    So there you are - you've just made a false statement with the intention of deceiving.
    That was my initial whole point (as you are fully aware).

    And if you want me to be as pedantic as yourself then your following statement is also wrong:
    Quote Originally Posted by Besoeker View Post
    "I again invite you to cite any post where I have lied. If you can't, you should remove my name from your pecking order."
    Obviously wrong, since my signature says nothing about lying at all - only "pork pies".
    Look up "pork pies" in the dictionary if you're going to use your own ridiculous arguments to try to somehow "disprove" me.

    However since it matters to you so much, I'll take your name off since I don't think there's much point you being on there.
    I can't be bothered with you whining on about it constantly.
    Last edited by youcanhandlethetruth; 07-12-2008 at 12:06 AM. Reason: removed blank lines, added quotes
    Only 1's that don't know, are the genuine people thinking it's about others sharing their own ideas.

  7. #17
    Trusted Member Besoeker is doing well Besoeker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    6,397

    Quote Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
    Are you still blithering on ?
    Ok let's do it.

    You stated:
    It's neither my definition nor yours. It's a dictionary definition so maybe we could/should consider that to be objective.

    It's not a dictionary defintion Besoeker.
    Agreed. No a dictionary definition.
    It is a definition given by several dictionaries.

  8. #18
    Uber Member John Connor is just really nice John Connor is just really nice John Connor is just really nice
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Hard Working Families' Socialist Republic of Untied Kingdomistan
    Posts
    3,533

    No matter.
    Last edited by John Connor; 08-12-2008 at 11:46 AM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2
FirstFirst 1 2

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts