re:g hall post #79
from the bottom of the Star article :-I guess that's enough peer review for you know who
The researchers say the new Ice Age could occur in 10,000 to 100,000 years.
Am I bovvered?![]()
"That government is best which governs least."
"This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries".
"To be "matter of fact" about the world is to blunder into fantasy --and dull fantasy at that, as the real world is strange and wonderful."
TANSTAAFL TANJ
He's not the only one who thinks the BBC is the New Pravda. Have fun with this link Clippo. It's nothing to do with your favourite subject, but a good example of some journalistic investigation by a paper that does not get public funding.
Auntie Beeb's amazing, evolving, ID card stories ? The Register
A Nip in Nippon napped a nod and knew a new nomad
Near the nearside window of his Mitsubishi
In reply to my quote:-
g hall wrote:-Quote:
The researchers say the new Ice Age could occur in 10,000 to 100,000 years.
Am I bovvered?
For goodness sake WHY !!!!!!!Clearly not BUT you and everyone else should be
(Based on known Milankovitch cycles over the last million years, it was almost certainly bound to happen in this timescale anyway – even after AGW (& Mankind) finally died down)
Probably for the same reason most of this worlds population isnt bothered about your much invented global warming matey.
I agree re-nationalization is needed e.g. water but to say
"libertarianism guarantees that our nations are controlled by international finance" must be a joke ?
I don't know what your defintion of "Libertarianism" is, but that isn't who is power now.
In fact any true libertarian is trying to stop the monopoly of power we see in the banker bailout.
Only 1's that don't know, are the genuine people thinking it's about others sharing their own ideas.
Hartlepool wrote:-
Even for you this this a pretty stupid & incorrect statement. (matey boy)Probably for the same reason most of this worlds population isnt bothered about your much invented global warming matey.
I repeat, why should I, & others, be worried about an ice-age which scientists have predicted for over a century & will almost certainly occur in 10-100 THOUSAND years time? (even I would place my shirt on a bet like that!!!!)
Truth of the matter probably is that g hall just read the headline and mistakenly thought this was an attack on the worldwide consensus of Anthropogenic GW.![]()
![]()
Last edited by Clippo; 16-11-2008 at 08:07 PM.
Bookmarks