But you have stated time and time again how important "peer review" is therefore I can only conclude you are only supportive when it is the favour of your position
because you happen to disagree, so you pick and choose rather a lot don't youand three of those papers, including the ‘other author’ were published in Energy & Environment (the shortcomings of this so-called journal are well known in the scientific world). I am almost ashamed to say this is published from a British University.
Mann and his promoters have more then spread their views around and still he does not really admit the error of his algorithmHowever, another impartiality-disturbing fact concerns these papers in E & E by M8M (pardon the abbrev.s – I’m going out soon) is that it is regarded as impeccable manners in a journal that if a contributor criticises another’s paper, then the 'criticised' is allowed to reply.
Specifically, in this case, even though he offered to do so, Mann was not permitted to reply to M&M's Hockey stick criticism.
Says it all for me !!!!
the fact that you state "says it all for me " merely emphasises your entrenched position


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote
‘As a starting point’, perhaps you would like to read the Wiki page on it:-
hysics/0210095v1, Oct 23 2002)
Bookmarks