Reply With Quoteoh!
So I suppose someone will now come on and say that this guy is talking out of his backside and that he is plain wrong. would fit in nicely with my thoughts on global warming / government involvement / taxation / etc
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Disproof of Global Warming Hype Published | MND: Your Daily Dose of Counter-Theory
"A mathematical proof that there is no “climate crisis” has been published in debate on global warming in Physics and Society, a scientific publication of the 46,000-strong American Physical Society.
Christopher Monckton, who once advised Margaret Thatcher, demonstrates via 30 equations that computer models used by the UN’s climate panel (IPCC) were pre-programmed with overstated values for the three variables whose product is “climate sensitivity” (temperature increase in response to greenhouse-gas increase), resulting in a 500-2000% overstatement of CO2’s effect on temperature in the IPCC’s latest climate assessment report, published in 2007.
........................
Lord Monckton’s paper reveals that –
--The IPCC’s 2007 climate summary overstated CO2’s impact on temperature by 500-2000%;
--CO2 enrichment will add little more than 1 °F (0.6 °C) to global mean surface temperature by 2100;
--Not one of the three key variables whose product is climate sensitivity can be measured directly;
--The IPCC’s values for these key variables are taken from only four published papers, not 2,500;
--The IPCC’s values for each of the three variables, and hence for climate sensitivity, are overstated;
--“Global warming” halted ten years ago, and surface temperature has been falling for seven years;
--Not one of the computer models relied upon by the IPCC predicted so long and rapid a cooling;
--The IPCC inserted a table into the scientists’ draft, overstating the effect of ice-melt by 1000%;
--It was proved 50 years ago that predicting climate more than two weeks ahead is impossible;
--Mars, Jupiter, Neptune’s largest moon, and Pluto warmed at the same time as Earth warmed;
--In the past 70 years the Sun was more active than at almost any other time in the past 11,400 years."
But hey, don't believe him, believe Clippo instead !
And before people start bashing him for not apparently being a "real" scientist, they should read his response to similar claims made in this response in 2006
Christopher Monckton: This wasn't gibberish. I got my facts right on global warming | Comment is free | The Guardian
Another article too:
Climate chaos? Don't believe it - Telegraph
Only 1's that don't know, are the genuine people thinking it's about others sharing their own ideas.
oh!
So I suppose someone will now come on and say that this guy is talking out of his backside and that he is plain wrong. would fit in nicely with my thoughts on global warming / government involvement / taxation / etc
Just on cue for you Angelman :-
I assume, this is the same 'story' that went around the blogs a month ago about Monckton's dazzling new calculations predicting the end of AGW.
If so, you would be well advised to start reading sources that are unbiased and more timely, e.g.
RealClimate
(if my assumption is wrong, then I'll wait for other real experts to debunk Monckton - as he has ALWAYS been done).
I assume, this is the same 'story' that went around the blogs a month ago about Monckton's dazzling new calculations predicting the end of AGW.
If so, you would be well advised to start reading sources that are unbiased and more timely, e.g.
RealClimateCode:Domain ID:D105219760-LROR Domain Name:REALCLIMATE.ORG Created On:19-Nov-2004 16:39:03 UTC Last Updated On:14-Nov-2007 03:01:43 UTC Expiration Date:19-Nov-2010 16:39:03 UTC Sponsoring Registrar:eNom, Inc. (R39-LROR) Status:OK Registrant ID:B133AE74B8066012 Registrant Name:Betsy Ensley Registrant Organization:Environmental Media Services Registrant Street1:1320 18th St, NW Registrant Street2:5th Floor Registrant Street3: Registrant City:Washington Registrant State/Province:DC Registrant Postal Code:20036 Registrant Country:US Registrant Phone:+1.2024636670 Registrant Phone Ext.: Registrant FAX: Registrant FAX Ext.: Registrant Email:betsy@ems.org Admin ID:B133AE74B8066012 Admin Name:Betsy Ensley Admin Organization:Environmental Media Services Admin Street1:1320 18th St, NW Admin Street2:5th Floor Admin Street3: Admin City:Washington Admin State/Province:DC Admin Postal Code:20036 Admin Country:US Admin Phone:+1.2024636670 Admin Phone Ext.: Admin FAX: Admin FAX Ext.: Admin Email:betsy@ems.org Tech ID:B133AE74B8066012 Tech Name:Betsy Ensley Tech Organization:Environmental Media Services Tech Street1:1320 18th St, NW Tech Street2:5th Floor Tech Street3: Tech City:Washington Tech State/Province:DC Tech Postal Code:20036 Tech Country:US Tech Phone:+1.2024636670 Tech Phone Ext.: Tech FAX: Tech FAX Ext.: Tech Email:betsy@ems.org Name Server:NS227.PAIR.COMBetsy Ensley started realclimate and also has other sites like bushgreenwatch.org & womenagainstbush.org. She appears to be some sort of paid political activist for all things green and all things anti-bush.Registrant Name:Betsy Ensley
No doubt they receive financial support from those that push this rubbish.
Learn more about Virgin Media, BT and Carphonewarehouse deal with Phorm and how this affects your privacy.
http://www.badphorm.co.uk/page.php?2
Still not convinced, see Here
I want nothing to do with Phorm, in anyway, shape or Phorm.
Clippo,
You have no proof, no evidence to back up your claims, nothing.
All you can do is resort to slander tactics based on nothing.
And you expect people to believe you have "scientific" insight ?
Only 1's that don't know, are the genuine people thinking it's about others sharing their own ideas.
YCHTT wrote:-
On the contrary - (if this subject is the one I referred to).Clippo,
You have no proof, no evidence to back up your claims, nothing.
If you read the RealClimate article I linked to you may understand, (although I doubt it) that Monckton's methodology has been shown to be seriously flawed by the Climate scientists who actually do real research into this subject.
You may even wish to read these, and their links within to see how comprehensively Monckton’s calculations are a load of the bovine smelly stuff.
Deltoid: Monckton's triple counting
Duae Quartunciae: The APS and global warming: What were they thinking?
Deltoid: Even more Monckton
Proof enough for me and the consensus of the rest of the scientific world..
Originally Posted by Clippo
Code:Domain Name.......... scienceblogs.com Creation Date........ 2003-08-02 Registration Date.... 2003-08-02 Expiry Date.......... 2011-08-02 Organisation Name.... ScienceBlogs, LLC Organisation Address. 12 West 21st St, 7th Floor Organisation Address. Organisation Address. New York Organisation Address. 10010 Organisation Address. NY Organisation Address. UNITED STATES Admin Name........... Adam Bly Admin Address........ 12 West 21st St, 7th Floor Admin Address........ Admin Address........ New York Admin Address........ 10010 Admin Address........ NY Admin Address........ UNITED STATES Admin Email.......... webmaster@seedmediagroup.com Admin Phone.......... +1.6463518510 Admin Fax............ Tech Name............ Adam Bly Tech Address......... 12 West 21st St, 7th Floor Tech Address......... Tech Address......... New York Tech Address......... 10010 Tech Address......... NY Tech Address......... UNITED STATES Tech Email........... webmaster@seedmediagroup.com Tech Phone........... +1.6463518510 Tech Fax............. Name Server.......... ns.rackspace.com Name Server.......... ns2.rackspace.comScienceBlogs - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaScienceBlogs is an invitation-only blog network and virtual community. It was created by Seed Media Group in 2006 to enhance the public understanding of science.
So it only invites certain members of the science community, sound like propaganda to me.
Learn more about Virgin Media, BT and Carphonewarehouse deal with Phorm and how this affects your privacy.
http://www.badphorm.co.uk/page.php?2
Still not convinced, see Here
I want nothing to do with Phorm, in anyway, shape or Phorm.
We don't believe this is true Clippo - as Monckton and countless others have demonstrated through countless non-mainstream articles posted.
We know that science has become corrupted and manipulated by "policy".
Policy dictates the science, not vice versa.
Similar to the phrase "lies, lies and statistics", Monckton demonstrates that those claiming the science of MMGW is correct, is demonstrating how it is actually wrong.
To counter that argument with your old line of "that's not authentic" or "don't beleive this, believe that" is missing the point completely when Monckton is the one making the accusation that their science is incorrect.
You believe those given a platform within the IPCC fraternity and mainstream media are trustworthy scientists(do you really ?) and people that have woken up to the truth do not trust them as far as they can throw them.
That's where we differ.
Only 1's that don't know, are the genuine people thinking it's about others sharing their own ideas.
More 'the website i've found is better than the one you found' discussion.
Who gives a ****?
It's august, and i'm freezing.
The artic is melting and - oddly - my feet are still dry.
I live on a hill
Gordon Brown taxes on me will save the planet, anyway.
--------------------------------------------------
Users on ignore list: None. I've got to have people to laugh at.
.
YCHTT wrote:-
You are utterly & absolutely wrong YChTT. In this case, & most of Monckton's other allegations, he has attempted to recalculate certain sets of data to show that AGW is either false or that it doesn't matter.We don't believe this is true Clippo - as Monckton and countless others have demonstrated through countless non-mainstream articles posted.
In every case, those with far greater mathematical abilities than you or I, have found critical flaws in his logic, be that cherry-picking data or using assumptions that have unsound mathematical bases. In this particular APS case, if you had read particularly my middle link earlier, Monckton introduces a 'factor' into the calculation which is a third of that used by everybody and cannot justify why he did so.
I recall acres of postings you have had with Akria and Besoeker on the subject of 'proof'. But one thing I think they and most intellectuals agree is that only only in mathematics is a logical 'proof' absolute.
You are simply too paranoid about your 'conspiracy' theories to accept, as the rest of the world does, that AGW is real & won't go away on the flawed calculations of shills like Monckton.
You asked me for 'proof' - I've given it to you. Now you 'prove' to me that AGW is a con.
( & no 2nd or 3rd hand 'cr*p from Infowars or similar crackpot sources please, - just peer-reviewed science please).
Bookmarks