British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > General Politics > Environment & Energy


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16-05-2008, 07:28 AM   #71 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Besoeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,753
Besoeker is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpdavies View Post
Only when massively subsidised with stolen taxpayer cash.
Got any basis for that?
Besoeker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 16-05-2008, 09:11 AM   #72 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 30,615
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Besoeker View Post
Got any basis for that?
Write to your council and ask them how much you now pay to have your rubbish collected.

I am paying roughly double now. Though I admit this includes other wonderful benefits such as CCTV, windmills on roundabouts etc.

When they send the next breakdown, I will scam it in and show you what a scam it all is.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2008, 09:33 AM   #73 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Besoeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,753
Besoeker is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpdavies View Post
Write to your council and ask them how much you now pay to have your rubbish collected.
And, without that, manufacturing pulp from new raw material would be cheaper?
Because that's what you are claiming.
Besoeker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2008, 09:58 AM   #74 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 30,615
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Besoeker View Post
And, without that, manufacturing pulp from new raw material would be cheaper?
Because that's what you are claiming.
Yes it would, because the cost of recyled goods would be more expensive to companies, as they won't have the stolen taxpayer cash to create it cheaper.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2008, 01:32 PM   #75 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Besoeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,753
Besoeker is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpdavies View Post
Yes it would, because the cost of recyled goods would be more expensive to companies, as they won't have the stolen taxpayer cash to create it cheaper.
But more expensive than using raw materials?

Do you know how much it costs to produce pulp from new raw material?
Do you know the extent to which recycled paper comes solely from kerbside collection and how much is commercial waste?
Do you know how much paper mills pay for that waste?
Do you know how much de-inking costs?
To be certain of what you are claiming, you would need to know all that and a lot more in detail.
Do you?
Besoeker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2008, 05:53 PM   #76 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 30,615
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Besoeker View Post
But more expensive than using raw materials?

Do you know how much it costs to produce pulp from new raw material?
Do you know the extent to which recycled paper comes solely from kerbside collection and how much is commercial waste?
Do you know how much paper mills pay for that waste?
Do you know how much de-inking costs?
To be certain of what you are claiming, you would need to know all that and a lot more in detail.
Do you?
All I know, is that businesses chose to use new stuff rather than recycled, before the taxpayer got raped to make it worth their while using it.

If it was more profitable to use recycled than new, then the taxpayer wouldn't need raping, as business would see it in their interest to encourage recycling for their own gain.

Once upon a time this was the case with certain materials and it may be again if materials become scarce. For now though, thing like paper and plastic are a total waste of time, energy and money. It does more harm than good and people have to be robbed to keep the whole scam going to boot.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2008, 06:44 PM   #77 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Besoeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,753
Besoeker is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpdavies View Post
All I know, is that businesses chose to use new stuff rather than recycled, before the taxpayer got raped to make it worth their while using it.
Papermills didn't.
Recycling started long before kerbside collection.

Last edited by Besoeker; 16-05-2008 at 06:47 PM.
Besoeker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2008, 10:46 AM   #78 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
tito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Pembrokeshire
Posts: 3,035
tito is just starting out
Send a message via AIM to tito Send a message via MSN to tito
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Besoeker View Post
Papermills didn't.
Recycling started long before kerbside collection.
You are being entirely evasive and pedantic.

Recycling is one big subsidised mess right now, the commodity is valuable only because so much of the process is done with public money. This is a direct disincentive for companies to invest in recycling to make it affordable, efficient and practical.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayn Rand
"Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good."
For life, Liberty and Prosperity
http://lpuk.org/
tito is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2008, 02:41 PM   #79 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
For_England's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,664
For_England is just starting out
Default

You all better get used to it and stop whinging - we've been living off the future for way too long, and industrialised packaging is a luxury that will increasingly disappear.
For_England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2008, 03:33 PM   #80 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
tito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Pembrokeshire
Posts: 3,035
tito is just starting out
Send a message via AIM to tito Send a message via MSN to tito
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by For_England View Post
You all better get used to it and stop whinging - we've been living off the future for way too long, and industrialised packaging is a luxury that will increasingly disappear.
********.

It's just more of your left-wing savagery.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayn Rand
"Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good."
For life, Liberty and Prosperity
http://lpuk.org/
tito is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0