British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > General Politics > Environment & Energy


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26-04-2008, 01:16 PM   #11 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 30,615
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

You should be grateful. At least he just ignored your question, instead of trying to ******** you, as with Poptech.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 26-04-2008, 02:02 PM   #12 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
C_steam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Anwhere far away from the cabalistas
Posts: 7,167
C_steam is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpdavies View Post
You should be grateful. At least he just ignored your question, instead of trying to ******** you, as with Poptech.
damn. I haven't been ********'d for ages.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------

Users on ignore list: None. I've got to have people to laugh at.
Cowardly Posters* list: BobFM, Bellatrix.*People who post personal insults then refuse to reply

.
C_steam is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2008, 02:29 PM   #13 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North East England
Posts: 6,409
Hartlepool has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C_steam View Post
damn. I haven't been ********'d for ages.


If you hang around here a while I guarantee you soon will beC_s.
Hartlepool is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2008, 08:00 PM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,773
Clippo is just starting out
Default

C_Steam wrote:-
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hartlepool
clipp won't answer yet,he is perhaps still waiting for direction from his EU/US HO.

seems like you're right, HP
I have just said in another thread I won't be able to post for a few days - but rest assured I'll be back to 'politely' point out your complete misunderstanding of the ice melting / sea level rise situation.

PS. As a moderator C_Steam I feel you should suggest to your buddy HP that his snide comments are not condusive to reasonable debate.
Clippo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2008, 03:28 AM   #15 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 124
Poptech is just starting out
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clippo View Post
but rest assured I'll be back to 'politely' point out your complete misunderstanding of the ice melting / sea level rise situation.
Don't worry while you are gone I will explain it to them:

"What If All the Ice Melts?" Myths and Realities (Wm. Robert Johnston, B.A. Astronomy, M.S. Physics)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wm. Robert Johnston
Arctic Ocean pack ice = 0.01 % Fraction of world ice - The melting of floating ice will not change sea level: the mass of this ice is equal to that of the water it displaces (watch the water level in a cup of floating ice cubes as they melt).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wm. Robert Johnston
Based on what we know now, in the next 100 years a rise in sea level of 0.1 meters (4 inches) would not be surprising; those predicting changes of 0.5-2 meters (1.5-7 feet) are using flawed models.
Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud (PDF) (Nils-Axel Mörner, Emeritus Professor of Paleogeophysics & Geodynamics, Stockholm University)

Observed Changes in Sea Level (IPCC)
Quote:
Originally Posted by IPCC
Based on tide gauge data, the rate of global mean sea level rise during the 20th century is in the range 1.0 to 2.0 mm/yr. No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.
Falling - Arctic dips as global waters rise (BBC)
Falling - Falling sea level upsets theory of global warming (The Daily Telegraph, UK)
Falling - Global Warming Can Make Sea Level Plunge (BBC)
Falling - Global Warming Will Lower Sea Levels (Fred Singer, Ph.D. Physics)
Falling - Oceans to fall, not rise, over millions of years (Reuters)
Falling - Sea Levels Are Falling Over the Long Term Because of Lower Basins (The New York Times)

IPCC Falsifies Sea Level Data (The Daily Telegraph, UK)
Poptech is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2008, 07:36 AM   #16 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North East England
Posts: 6,409
Hartlepool has some supporters
Default

Even more brilliant stuff from Poptech for which I thank them.

Note,..C_s,I do believe that clippo has just reprimanded your previous post,he will be running the whole thing in a week or so at this rate eh?
Hartlepool is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2008, 08:32 AM   #17 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
C_steam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Anwhere far away from the cabalistas
Posts: 7,167
C_steam is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clippo View Post
I'll be back to 'politely' point out your complete misunderstanding of the ice melting / sea level rise situation.
so asking questions is out now then is it clippo? Or does your arrogance always assume a question is born out of misunderstanding?

I'll reiterate my questions:-

Quote:
The pace at which both the Arctic sea ice and the Greenland ice sheet is melting has "severely accelerated"
I take to mean that there is more melting of the ice sheet than previously - ergo more ice has melted, therefore sea level should be affected. My first question - to what extent?

Quote:
if sea ice has shrank, then the land ice must have been affected also to some extent as the extract from the article implies. For example, if land ice (for some reason) is only affected by, say, 25% as much as the sea ice, then the land ice will have receded by 10% in round terms. Which, going back to the article, implies about a 90cm increase in ocean level. Which hasn't happended. Does 'severely accelerated' and 'melting' when applied to the greenland icesheet actually mean what it says?
was my second question.

The overall impact of a complete loss of the greenland icecap is an increase in sea level of somewhere between 7 and 10M, depending on which study you look at. Either way, catastrophic. We have seen shrinkage of the sea ice and draw pack of the pack ice limits, so how much of the greenland ice cap have we lost (q3), and what impact has it had so far on sea levels?(as q1)

No misunderstanding, clipppo, just seeking the clarification of the above.

I can wait for you to talk to your buddies first.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------

Users on ignore list: None. I've got to have people to laugh at.
Cowardly Posters* list: BobFM, Bellatrix.*People who post personal insults then refuse to reply

.
C_steam is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2008, 09:34 AM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,773
Clippo is just starting out
Default

Firstly, to get Poptech out of the way, he/she wrote:-
Quote:
Don't worry while you are gone I will explain it to them:
(Followed by a collection of denier sponsored references, which cast doubt upon whether the ice is melting.)
That’s not an explanation of the ‘mechanism’ of ice melting/ sea-level change. It’s the usual sceptic doubt generating diarrhoea from the usual gang of crackpots.
…………………………….
You’ve nearly answered your own doubts C-Steam with your final comments:-

Quote:
so what's going on? Is it that the air temperature is still at such a temperature as to maintain the land ice, while the water temperature is increasing enough to cause significant sea ice melting?
Where I think you are at fault is your assumption that air and/or water temperature is the main criteria. You should rather consider the heat capacity of water and air.
For example, water can hold more heat than an equivalent mass/volume of air.
There are several different measures of heat capacity but as a generalisation water can hold about 4 times as much heat as air by any measure.
For the intellectually challenged, a practical example is that a human can walk in sub-zero temperatures for hours (with reasonable protective clothing) but how long would that human survive after falling into an icy lake?
(The icy lake has a greater capacity to remove heat from a human body than cold air – and I don’t want to get into the semantics of this being a reverse example)

So back to the Arctic situation. You have to identify where the heat is coming from to cause melting.
Consider land ice initially.
There is no significant source of heat from the underlying rocks (okay a small volcanic hot-spot has recently been found in NE Greenland I think but it’s significance in ice melting is small according to consensus of scientists studying it).
The only other source of heat is solar radiation. Don’t quote me accurately on these figures but I think overall measurements suggest 1.3 KW of ‘heat’ fall on every sq. m. of the Earth per day without cloud or aerosol interference. However, ice has a high reflectivity, or albedo, and the actual amount absorbed by ice is about 0.1 i.e. 1%
Considering arctic sea - ice,
Once again, solar radiation is a source but the same comments apply.
The second source of heat is obviously from the ocean waters below the ice. I have already explained how water has a greater heat capacity than air and thus it is the heat in the water which is melting the arctic ice much, much faster than land ice.
Where does the heat come from initially in the arctic ocean ? Well, you now have to bring into play the ocean circulations, particularly the ‘thermohaline circulation’. (This is also known by several other names but in Climate science circles the name Meridional overturning Circulation- abbrev. MOC is widely preferred).
I don’t propose to go into the detail of this. If you are curious, you can do a google search or go to Wiki which has a very balanced account of the science of this:-
Thermohaline circulation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Essentially, the MOC in the north Atlantic is continually bringing tropics-warmed water to the arctic ocean and since, due to the greenhouse effect, the surface waters of the tropics are warming even more there is a positive feedback effect in eventually accelerating the arctic sea ice melt.

So, to repeat, I think you had the germ of an explanation in your own last statement.

I think your estimate of 25% of 39%, if I’ve interpreted it correctly, is grossly inflated and I’m not going to hesitate a guess. There is no doubt that some of the Greenland ice sheet is melting but if you want to find out how much, in proportion to the sea ice, I suggest you do some research first through respectable science articles & peer-reviewed papers – as I had to do originally.
Lastly, on this topic I want to point out 2 important secondary effect of sea- ice melting.
a) Whereas, the ‘albedo’ of sea-ice is high, e.g. virtually an insignificant amount of melting results from solar radiation, when the ice has gone, the resulting ocean has virtually no Albedo, e.g. most solar radiation (1.3 KW / m2 per day) is absorbed into the water. This is another positive feedback.
b) Both in the Arctic & Antarctic, the presence of sea ice is thought to have slowed the flow of glaciers to the sea. Melting of sea ice has removed that impediment and at both poles glaciers are now flowing to the sea at increased rates.

I’m getting bored with this. I can’t remember what the current rate of sea rise is and I don’t have time now to look. As I said earlier, why don’t you do some google or other searches. What I do know is that in the last IPCC report there a number of scenarios were presented. The experts in these subjects have in fact criticised the IPCC for being too conservative. Obviously, the writer of your original article link is in this camp – as I am.
Clippo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2008, 09:48 AM   #19 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Besoeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,734
Besoeker is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C_steam View Post
The overall impact of a complete loss of the greenland icecap is an increase in sea level of somewhere between 7 and 10M,
From memory, I think that is about right. I showed the basis of my calculations in this forum quite some time ago.
I think that it was in response to a post made by one of the members of long standing. He had worked back from the 7m and got an erroneous (and quite unbelievable) figure for the volume of the Greenland icecap. He thus concluded that the 7m rise was also unbelievable. I had a look at his figures and noted that he had used the 7 as 7km, not 7m. He thanked me for the correction. Aplogies to the original poster - I am not totally certain who it was.
Besoeker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2008, 12:45 PM   #20 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 124
Poptech is just starting out
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clippo
Followed by a collection of denier sponsored references,

It’s the usual sceptic doubt generating diarrhoea from the usual gang of crackpots.
Clippo believes these to be crackpot denier sponsored references:

Wm. Robert Johnston, B.A. Astronomy, M.S. Physics
Nils-Axel Mörner, Emeritus Professor of Paleogeophysics & Geodynamics, Stockholm University
IPCC
BBC
The Daily Telegraph, UK
S. Fred Singer, Ph.D. Physics, Professor Emeritus of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia
Reuters
The New York Times

Wait what is that the IPCC? How did that get in there? Wait did Clippo not read anything I posted and knee jerk reacted to anything posted as he does to everything? I will let you decide.

Clippo then you ask a question I answered:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clippo
I can’t remember what the current rate of sea rise is and I don’t have time now to look.
"Based on tide gauge data, the rate of global mean sea level rise during the 20th century is in the range 1.0 to 2.0 mm/yr. No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected." - IPCC

As for Greenland:

Greenland - 2008, Deep Freeze in Western Greenland (Sermitsiaq, Greenland)
Greenland - 1817, Dramatic Ice loss in the Greenland seas (A History of the Royal Society Archive)
Greenland - Current Melting of Greenland's Ice Mimics 1920s-1940s Event (Science Daily)
Greenland - ERS Altimeter Survey Shows Growth of Greenland Ice Sheet Interior (ESA - European Space Agency)
Greenland - Fossil DNA Proves Greenland Once Had Lush Forests; Ice Sheet Is Surprisingly Stable (Science Daily)
Greenland - Greenland's Glaciers Have Been Receding for 100 Years (University of Aarhus, Denmark)
Greenland - Greenland’s Glaciers Take a Breather (The New York Times)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The New York Times
Greenland was about as warm or warmer in the 1930’s and 40’s, and many of the glaciers were smaller than they are now.
Greenland - Greenland Ice Sheet Changes Are Normal; No Evidence Of Long-Term Climate Changes (Science Daily)
Greenland - Greenland Temperatures Coldest in 60 Years (The Heartland Institute)
Greenland - Is Greenland really melting? (Patrick J. Michaels, Ph.D. Ecological Climatology)
Greenland - Latest Scientific Studies Refute Fears of Greenland Melt (US Senate Environment & Public Works Committee)
Greenland - Letter to the Editor: Greenland Ice Gain Since World War II (The Heartland Institute)
Greenland - Recent cooling in coastal southern Greenland and relation with the North Atlantic Oscillation (American Geophysical Union)
Greenland - Study Shows Greenland’s Ice Growing (CO2 Science)
Greenland - The Cold Truth about Greenland (Patrick J. Michaels, Ph.D. Ecological Climatology)
Greenland Volcanic Activity - Heat From Earth's Magma Contributing To Melting Of Greenland Ice (Science Daily)

Antarctica is not melting:

Antarctica - Antarctic ice sheet thickening, researcher says (Associated Press)
Antarctica - Antarctic Sea Ice at Record High (The Reference Frame)
Antarctica - Antarctic Sea Ice Increases over Past Two Decades (Space.com)
Antarctica - Antarctic Temperatures Disagree With Climate Model Predictions (Science Daily)
Antarctica - East Antarctica's surface slowly rising (The New York Times)
Antarctica - Geologists Find That Tides Control Flow Of Antarctic Ice Streams (Science Daily)
Antarctica - Ice Core 'Dipstick' Indicates West Antarctic Ice Has Thinned Less Than Believed (Science Daily)
Antarctica - Ice 'thickens' in West Antarctica (BBC)
Antarctica - No Major Changes Seen In Stability Of Antarctic Ice Sheet (Science Daily)
Antarctica - Pondering A Climate Conundrum In Antarctica; Unique, Distinct Cooling Trend Discovered On Earth's Southernmost Continent (Science Daily)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Science Daily
...seasonally averaged surface air temperature has decreased by 0.7 degrees Celsius per decade
Antarctica - Researchers: Antarctica Ice Sheet Stable (ABC News)
Antarctica - Researchers find Antarctic ice is thickening (USA Today)
Antarctica - Satellites Show Overall Increases In Antarctic Sea Ice Cover (NASA)
Antarctica - Scientists Detect Thickening Of West Antarctic Ice Sheet (Science Daily)
Antarctica - Scientists Rule Out One Threat Of Antarctic Collapse (Science Daily)
Antarctica - Snowfall-Driven Growth in East Antarctic Ice Sheet Mitigates Recent Sea-Level Rise (Science)
Antarctica - Study: Antarctic Ice Sheet Is Thickening, Not Thinning (ABC News)
Antarctica - The Antarctic deep sea gets colder (EurekAlert! AAAS)
Antarctica - Tidal Motion Influences Antarctic Ice Sheet (Science Daily)
Antarctica - The Antarctic Ice Sheet is Growing Thicker (Not by Fire but by Ice)
Antarctica Ice Shelves - Antarctic Ice Shelf Collapse Blamed On More Than Climate Change (Science Daily)
Antarctica Ice Shelves - Antarctic Ice Shelf Retreats Happened Before (Science Daily)
Antarctica Ice Shelves - The Wilkins Ice Shelf Con Job (Icecap)
Antarctica Volcanic Activity - First Evidence Of Under-ice Volcanic Eruption In Antarctica (Science Daily)
Antarctica Volcanic Activity - Protective Ice Flow in Antarctica Linked to Warmth of Volcanoes (The New York Times)
Antarctica Volcanic Activity - Scientists Discover Undersea Volcano Off Antarctica (Science Daily)
Antarctica Volcanic Activity - Scientists Find Active Volcano in Antarctica (The New York Times)
Poptech is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and FuzzFizz
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0