British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > General Politics > Environment & Energy


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-05-2008, 02:58 PM   #101 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Besoeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,921
Besoeker is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poptech View Post
Hey wait the 13 names on the science society president's action letter does not list their degrees either. I wonder if they really have them? Maybe more of the same. Maybe OISM made that one up too but this time for the IPCC so they could keep arguing. But OISM intentionally left off all the degrees on theirs so people would ask these questions and not believe OISM. They then wasted their time putting it online all the names! They even categorized them by state so you can locate the local baker... I mean Phd MD.
When you are in a hole, stop digging.
Besoeker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 02-05-2008, 03:04 PM   #102 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 176
Poptech is just starting out
Default

I am in such a hole, OISM is a big conspiracy by Boooosh to keep going in Iraq. Boooosh told them to only add MD and PhD so it looks suspicious and you will question if they are real. This way they could use cab drivers and add them to the list but put MD next them. But since cab drivers do not publish peer-review they would substitute PhD instead of MD for them and make it look more real. But they would leave MD on there to keep you guessing about Iraq.
Poptech is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 03:07 PM   #103 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Besoeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,921
Besoeker is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poptech View Post
I am in such a hole, OISM is a big conspiracy by Boooosh to keep going in Iraq. Boooosh told them to only add MD and PhD so it looks suspicious and you will question if they are real. This way they could use cab drivers and add them to the list but put MD next them. But since cab drivers do not publish peer-review they would substitute PhD instead of MD for them and make it look more real. But they would leave MD on there to keep you guessing about Iraq.
Another erudite and constructive post..........
Besoeker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 03:14 PM   #104 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 176
Poptech is just starting out
Default

OISM understood that when you do a petition on global warming consensus and you poll scientists with physical science degrees it would immediately be questioned because to the alarmists only a scientist who has a degree in CLIMATOLOGY and published peer-review papers in the last 5 minutes only in the journals approved by realclimate and not labeled as no good by realclimate are able to to give a scientific opinion on climate change. It is well known scientists trained in any other field have trouble reading thermometers and interpretting the results but those who have a degree in CLIMATOLOGY and publishing peer-review papers every 5 minutes only in the journals approved by realclimate not labeled as no good by realclimate can read and interpret thermometers easy. I understand perfectly.
Poptech is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 03:58 PM   #105 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Besoeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,921
Besoeker is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poptech View Post
OISM understood that when you do a petition on global warming consensus ....
It wasn't a petition on global warming consensus.
Besoeker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 11:49 PM   #106 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 176
Poptech is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Besoeker View Post
It wasn't a petition on global warming consensus.
The whole point of the petition was to prove there is no consensus!!!!!
Poptech is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 02:53 AM   #107 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
BonnieDundee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Between Mallaig and Cornwall.
Posts: 2,604
BonnieDundee is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poptech View Post
I am sorry for using "newspapers" to report the news of the blatant liberal Bias at the BBC but the evidence is overwhelming:

BBC report finds bias within corporation (The Daily Telegraph, UK)
Bias and the Beeb (Financial Times, UK)
Bias at the Beeb - official (The Times, UK)
BBC confesses bias on religion, politics (WorldNetDaily)
BBC network admits it: We're biased toward left (WorldNetDaily)
BBC report damns its ‘culture of bias’ (The Times, UK)
BBC viewers angered by its 'innate liberal bias' (The Daily Telegraph, UK)
Confessions of a BBC liberal (The Times, UK)
Facebook reveals the BBC as a liberal hotbed (The Daily Mail, UK)
The BBC's commitment to bias is no laughing matter (The Daily Telegraph, UK)
The Beeb's Bias (The Wall Street Journal)
We are biased, admit the stars of BBC News (Daily Mail, UK)
Why saving Earth is not the BBC's job (Daily Mail, UK)
Who even mentioned the BBC? And if you think it worse than Murdoch's newspapers you have another thing coming.

Quote:
Then surely you can prove me wrong and provide me with the scientific survey of all the members that show a clear "consensus".
I don't have. Can you provide me a survey showing most US marines do not have loyalty to North Korea?
Quote:
I have destroyed all your attempts at argument with plenty of SOURCES. I realize this is shocking to those who want to promote the alarmist hysteria
.
You have destroyed nothing but your credibility and it has been noted that you are unable to form your own arguments and just use dubious links. And nothing beats the links I had anyway.

Quote:
As have both of you have noted you are unable to answer my questions and by default are proven wrong.
Now you've gone and ****** me off, I really don't like morons who claim victory like that, particularly those who have zero substance.

By default you are proven to not have the reading comprehension to read a webpage where it is all written. Therefore all your arguments, which are very dubious anyway, should be discarded.

Everyone else note that this guy can't even read the Wiki rule page that me and Alex provided him with. I THINK HE CAN SAFELY BE IGNORED.
__________________
"It is poor civic hygiene to install technologies that could someday facilitate a police state."
-Bruce Schneier

How to Overthrow the System: brew your own beer; kick in your TV; build your own cabin and p*ss off front porch whenever you bloody well feel like it.
Edward Abbey

Leopold Kohr.

Last edited by BonnieDundee; 03-05-2008 at 02:58 AM.
BonnieDundee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 02:56 AM   #108 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
BonnieDundee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Between Mallaig and Cornwall.
Posts: 2,604
BonnieDundee is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poptech View Post
The whole point of the petition was to prove there is no consensus!!!!!
I thought it was meant to be joke?

The consensus is overwhelming, the world's thirteen official science societies such as the Royal society have taken action to show this. So either try some actual arguments or go away, you are becoming very irritating to many people it seems and for little substance in return.
__________________
"It is poor civic hygiene to install technologies that could someday facilitate a police state."
-Bruce Schneier

How to Overthrow the System: brew your own beer; kick in your TV; build your own cabin and p*ss off front porch whenever you bloody well feel like it.
Edward Abbey

Leopold Kohr.
BonnieDundee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 09:21 AM   #109 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 30,604
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

There is plenty of con, but not much sense for us.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 11:41 AM   #110 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 176
Poptech is just starting out
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee View Post
Who even mentioned the BBC? And if you think it worse than Murdoch's newspapers you have another thing coming.
I mentioned it since you seem to think a liberally biased source is ok but one that actually prints the opinion of the other side in addition to the left is not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee View Post
I don't have. Can you provide me a survey showing most US marines do not have loyalty to North Korea?
You don't have evidence for your "scientific" position? Then that is called faith AKA religion. Your question doesn't even make any sense since "loyalty" has nothing to do with science. But I can see how someone who believes faith science would be interested in non-scientific arguments.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee View Post
You have destroyed nothing but your credibility and it has been noted that you are unable to form your own arguments and just use dubious links. And nothing beats the links I had anyway.
I've destroyed you each time over and over. You cannot back up any of your positions. I not only explained my clear position I back it up with evidence. What links the one that is signed by 13 "scientists"? Lets see 19,000 vs. 13 .... I wonder if anyone can do the math for me.

Oh you will love this. One of your signers appears to be the ultimate expert on global warming!

Canadian Royal Society President: Patricia Demers, Ph.D. English and French!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee View Post
Now you've gone and ****** me off, I really don't like morons who claim victory like that, particularly those who have zero substance.

By default you are proven to not have the reading comprehension to read a webpage where it is all written. Therefore all your arguments, which are very dubious anyway, should be discarded.

Everyone else note that this guy can't even read the Wiki rule page that me and Alex provided him with. I THINK HE CAN SAFELY BE IGNORED.[
So either answer my questions or you lose by default because you are incapable of answering them! I've read the page and NONE of my questions were answered there. Why not point it out to me and embarrass me? Prove me wrong! Come on you can do it, you sure talk a lot but no action.

Yes you would like all my facts and sources to be ignored so you can continue to spread your propaganda unchallenged!

Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee View Post
I thought it was meant to be joke?

The consensus is overwhelming, the world's thirteen official science societies such as the Royal society have taken action to show this. So either try some actual arguments or go away, you are becoming very irritating to many people it seems and for little substance in return.
So overwhelming that all you can produce is a paper signed by 13 "scientists" one of which is...

Canadian Royal Society President: Patricia Demers, Ph.D. English and French!!!

Yes I am becoming VERY irritating to the propagandists!

Last edited by Poptech; 03-05-2008 at 11:45 AM.
Poptech is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0