LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
When you are in a hole, stop digging.Originally Posted by Poptech
I am in such a hole, OISM is a big conspiracy by Boooosh to keep going in Iraq. Boooosh told them to only add MD and PhD so it looks suspicious and you will question if they are real. This way they could use cab drivers and add them to the list but put MD next them. But since cab drivers do not publish peer-review they would substitute PhD instead of MD for them and make it look more real. But they would leave MD on there to keep you guessing about Iraq.
Another erudite and constructive post..........
OISM understood that when you do a petition on global warming consensus and you poll scientists with physical science degrees it would immediately be questioned because to the alarmists only a scientist who has a degree in CLIMATOLOGY and published peer-review papers in the last 5 minutes only in the journals approved by realclimate and not labeled as no good by realclimate are able to to give a scientific opinion on climate change. It is well known scientists trained in any other field have trouble reading thermometers and interpretting the results but those who have a degree in CLIMATOLOGY and publishing peer-review papers every 5 minutes only in the journals approved by realclimate not labeled as no good by realclimate can read and interpret thermometers easy. I understand perfectly.
It wasn't a petition on global warming consensus.
The whole point of the petition was to prove there is no consensus!!!!!
Who even mentioned the BBC? And if you think it worse than Murdoch's newspapers you have another thing coming.
I don't have. Can you provide me a survey showing most US marines do not have loyalty to North Korea?Then surely you can prove me wrong and provide me with the scientific survey of all the members that show a clear "consensus".
.I have destroyed all your attempts at argument with plenty of SOURCES. I realize this is shocking to those who want to promote the alarmist hysteria
You have destroyed nothing but your credibility and it has been noted that you are unable to form your own arguments and just use dubious links. And nothing beats the links I had anyway.
Now you've gone and ****** me off, I really don't like morons who claim victory like that, particularly those who have zero substance.As have both of you have noted you are unable to answer my questions and by default are proven wrong.
By default you are proven to not have the reading comprehension to read a webpage where it is all written. Therefore all your arguments, which are very dubious anyway, should be discarded.
Everyone else note that this guy can't even read the Wiki rule page that me and Alex provided him with. I THINK HE CAN SAFELY BE IGNORED.
Last edited by Wessexman; 03-05-2008 at 02:58 AM.
"A steady patriot of the world alone, The friend of every country but his own. "
-George Canning
I am an aristocrat. I love liberty; I hate equality.
-John Randolph
A spirit of innovation is generally the result of a selfish temper and confined views. People will not look forward to posterity, who never look backward to their ancestors.
-Edmund Burke
Leopold Kohr.
I thought it was meant to be joke?
The consensus is overwhelming, the world's thirteen official science societies such as the Royal society have taken action to show this. So either try some actual arguments or go away, you are becoming very irritating to many people it seems and for little substance in return.
"A steady patriot of the world alone, The friend of every country but his own. "
-George Canning
I am an aristocrat. I love liberty; I hate equality.
-John Randolph
A spirit of innovation is generally the result of a selfish temper and confined views. People will not look forward to posterity, who never look backward to their ancestors.
-Edmund Burke
Leopold Kohr.
There is plenty of con, but not much sense for us.
mkpdavies no longer posts on this forum
I mentioned it since you seem to think a liberally biased source is ok but one that actually prints the opinion of the other side in addition to the left is not.
You don't have evidence for your "scientific" position? Then that is called faith AKA religion. Your question doesn't even make any sense since "loyalty" has nothing to do with science. But I can see how someone who believes faith science would be interested in non-scientific arguments.
I've destroyed you each time over and over. You cannot back up any of your positions. I not only explained my clear position I back it up with evidence. What links the one that is signed by 13 "scientists"? Lets see 19,000 vs. 13 .... I wonder if anyone can do the math for me.
Oh you will love this. One of your signers appears to be the ultimate expert on global warming!
Canadian Royal Society President: Patricia Demers, Ph.D. English and French!!!
So either answer my questions or you lose by default because you are incapable of answering them! I've read the page and NONE of my questions were answered there. Why not point it out to me and embarrass me? Prove me wrong! Come on you can do it, you sure talk a lot but no action.
Yes you would like all my facts and sources to be ignored so you can continue to spread your propaganda unchallenged!
So overwhelming that all you can produce is a paper signed by 13 "scientists" one of which is...
Canadian Royal Society President: Patricia Demers, Ph.D. English and French!!!
Yes I am becoming VERY irritating to the propagandists!
Last edited by Poptech; 03-05-2008 at 11:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks