Waiting for Global Cooling still

Besoeker · 02-05-2008, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poptech

Hey wait the 13 names on the science society president's action letter does not list their degrees either. I wonder if they really have them? Maybe more of the same. Maybe OISM made that one up too but this time for the IPCC so they could keep arguing. But OISM intentionally left off all the degrees on theirs so people would ask these questions and not believe OISM. They then wasted their time putting it online all the names! They even categorized them by state so you can locate the local baker... I mean Phd MD.

When you are in a hole, stop digging.

Poptech · 02-05-2008, 03:04 PM

I am in such a hole, OISM is a big conspiracy by Boooosh to keep going in Iraq. Boooosh told them to only add MD and PhD so it looks suspicious and you will question if they are real. This way they could use cab drivers and add them to the list but put MD next them. But since cab drivers do not publish peer-review they would substitute PhD instead of MD for them and make it look more real. But they would leave MD on there to keep you guessing about Iraq.

Besoeker · 02-05-2008, 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poptech

I am in such a hole, OISM is a big conspiracy by Boooosh to keep going in Iraq. Boooosh told them to only add MD and PhD so it looks suspicious and you will question if they are real. This way they could use cab drivers and add them to the list but put MD next them. But since cab drivers do not publish peer-review they would substitute PhD instead of MD for them and make it look more real. But they would leave MD on there to keep you guessing about Iraq.

Another erudite and constructive post..........

Poptech · 02-05-2008, 03:14 PM

OISM understood that when you do a petition on global warming consensus and you poll scientists with physical science degrees it would immediately be questioned because to the alarmists only a scientist who has a degree in CLIMATOLOGY and published peer-review papers in the last 5 minutes only in the journals approved by realclimate and not labeled as no good by realclimate are able to to give a scientific opinion on climate change. It is well known scientists trained in any other field have trouble reading thermometers and interpretting the results but those who have a degree in CLIMATOLOGY and publishing peer-review papers every 5 minutes only in the journals approved by realclimate not labeled as no good by realclimate can read and interpret thermometers easy. I understand perfectly.

Besoeker · 02-05-2008, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poptech

OISM understood that when you do a petition on global warming consensus ....

It wasn't a petition on global warming consensus.

Poptech · 02-05-2008, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Besoeker

It wasn't a petition on global warming consensus.

The whole point of the petition was to prove there is no consensus!!!!!

BonnieDundee · 03-05-2008, 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poptech

I am sorry for using "newspapers" to report the news of the blatant liberal Bias at the BBC but the evidence is overwhelming:

BBC report finds bias within corporation (The Daily Telegraph, UK)
Bias and the Beeb (Financial Times, UK)
Bias at the Beeb - official (The Times, UK)
BBC confesses bias on religion, politics (WorldNetDaily)
BBC network admits it: We're biased toward left (WorldNetDaily)
BBC report damns its ‘culture of bias’ (The Times, UK)
BBC viewers angered by its 'innate liberal bias' (The Daily Telegraph, UK)
Confessions of a BBC liberal (The Times, UK)
Facebook reveals the BBC as a liberal hotbed (The Daily Mail, UK)
The BBC's commitment to bias is no laughing matter (The Daily Telegraph, UK)
The Beeb's Bias (The Wall Street Journal)
We are biased, admit the stars of BBC News (Daily Mail, UK)
Why saving Earth is not the BBC's job (Daily Mail, UK)

Who even mentioned the BBC? And if you think it worse than Murdoch's newspapers you have another thing coming.

Quote:

Then surely you can prove me wrong and provide me with the scientific survey of all the members that show a clear "consensus".

I don't have. Can you provide me a survey showing most US marines do not have loyalty to North Korea?

Quote:

I have destroyed all your attempts at argument with plenty of SOURCES. I realize this is shocking to those who want to promote the alarmist hysteria

.
You have destroyed nothing but your credibility and it has been noted that you are unable to form your own arguments and just use dubious links. And nothing beats the links I had anyway.

Quote:

As have both of you have noted you are unable to answer my questions and by default are proven wrong.

Now you've gone and ****** me off, I really don't like morons who claim victory like that, particularly those who have zero substance.

By default you are proven to not have the reading comprehension to read a webpage where it is all written. Therefore all your arguments, which are very dubious anyway, should be discarded.

Everyone else note that this guy can't even read the Wiki rule page that me and Alex provided him with. I THINK HE CAN SAFELY BE IGNORED.

BonnieDundee · 03-05-2008, 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poptech

The whole point of the petition was to prove there is no consensus!!!!!

I thought it was meant to be joke?

The consensus is overwhelming, the world's thirteen official science societies such as the Royal society have taken action to show this. So either try some actual arguments or go away, you are becoming very irritating to many people it seems and for little substance in return.

mkpdavies · 03-05-2008, 09:21 AM

There is plenty of con, but not much sense for us.

Poptech · 03-05-2008, 11:41 AM