British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > General Politics > Environment & Energy


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21-02-2008, 08:32 PM   #41 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Millennium3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 4,184
Millennium3 is just starting out
Default

The population concern was expressed in the first post ie that if Britain were obliged to take care of its own population in a time of global food shortage, presently, it could only provide for 17m of the 60m.
Millennium3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 21-02-2008, 08:50 PM   #42 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
John Connor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Away for Summer
Posts: 837
Party: None
John Connor has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
John,

Why don't you mention the government handouts given to immigrants first before you start to attack the most vulnerable - i.e the unemployed, parents and the sick ?
I thought that was implied when I typed "all government handouts". When I typed "all", I meant "all".
__________________
There are three types of people in this world: Libertarians, fascists and those who haven't been paying attention.

Users on ignore list: Akria, Besoeker, Clippo, david H, Ian C.
John Connor is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-02-2008, 09:27 PM   #43 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,180
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Connor View Post
I thought that was implied when I typed "all government handouts". When I typed "all", I meant "all".
Fair enough but you did say "first step".

So are you against the "hand outs" we give government in the way of taxation ?
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-02-2008, 11:41 PM   #44 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
John Connor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Away for Summer
Posts: 837
Party: None
John Connor has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
So are you against the "hand outs" we give government in the way of taxation ?
For anything beyond the bare minimum required to keep a functional infrastructure and defence system, yep.

But then, the money supply grows (which is why we have inflation) as it is, so why couldn't it grow via the government printing the money it requires to function? Surely we could do away with taxes entirely? In these days of fiat currency, it's not like they have to go dig more gold up, is it?
__________________
There are three types of people in this world: Libertarians, fascists and those who haven't been paying attention.

Users on ignore list: Akria, Besoeker, Clippo, david H, Ian C.
John Connor is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-02-2008, 12:02 AM   #45 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,180
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Connor View Post
For anything beyond the bare minimum required to keep a functional infrastructure and defence system, yep.

But then, the money supply grows (which is why we have inflation) as it is, so why couldn't it grow via the government printing the money it requires to function? Surely we could do away with taxes entirely? In these days of fiat currency, it's not like they have to go dig more gold up, is it?
In the case of the US, they are indeed printing the money, but does that solve the problem or does it create the problem ?

You make a good point. Why for instance, are governments choosing to borrow money that they should be able to print themselves ?
Do governments have control over their money supply or is it in the hands of privately owned bankers ?

As I understand it, whatever system is used to back up a nations wealth, normally they would not be able to create more money, gold or whatever, until additional natural resources and general wealth has been created.

But in the case of the fed, we see a situation where the value of the dollar had declined in recent years. It is not that gold has increased in value, but rather the value of the dollar has declined.

I suspect it will not be long before the dollar value collapses to reflect the rapidly deteriorating US economy, held together only by Asia's reserve dollars.

What happens if/when asia dumps the dollar ? Hold on to your seats.......

Anyway, to go back to the original point, I may agree with you.

But surely if people have payed money to the government in taxation, they deserve to use government public services, whether that be benefits, hospital treatment, whatever.

However you could not necessarily make the same case for immigrants who have entered the UK (not that I believe there aren't bigger issues to concern ourselves with).
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-02-2008, 12:22 AM   #46 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Ihope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 96
Ihope is just starting out
Default

bearing in mind your ignore list do you know anthing about HAARP technology regarding climate change?
Ihope is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-02-2008, 01:13 AM   #47 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,180
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Exclamation Are we being conned ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Millennium3 View Post

UK unable to sustain population, says study
By Joanna Corrigan
Last Updated: 11:41pm GMT 17/02/2008

The United Kingdom is drastically over-populated and could support only 17 million people if it had to provide for the current 60 million from its own resources, says a study published on Monday.

The UK has no hope of living sustainably unless every person's "ecological footprint" is reduced by more than 70 per cent, the study for the Optimum Population Trust (OPT) claims.

It predicts that if global population growth continues as expected, the world could be at war over resources in less than 50 years and calls on governments to advocate smaller families and increased use of contraception.

She added: "It also shows how desperately we need a national population policy."
Yes Millenium, I should have addressed that point too in my post.

If you read the above article carefully, you have to ask yourself:

a) why they are pointing towards a scenario in the future where Britain has to rely on it's own resources ?
As a country, we have managed to rely on our own resources for years. If there is a problem with food, surely the answer is to increase agricultural planning for the future and not "depopulation" ?!!
I suspect British agriculture is probably at an all time low, so why not support farming in Britain to ensure our survival.

b) what is the link between "living sustainably" and every person's ecological footprint ? Are we saying MMGW is causing a food/energy shortage ?
I just can't see a link at all - if someone can point it out to me I'd be grateful......

c) how would a situation where "the world could be at war over resources" come about ?
Wars do not just happen - they are planned by higher echelons in and above government - that statement only emphasizes the fact. The same also applies to energy reserves.

Millenium, you say "we change our current religion of 'getting and spending' to one which is possible to sustain." - you've got to read this which exposes the myth about oil running out, the fact there is an artificial scarcity being created, for the direct benefit of the oil companies:

The Myth Of Peak Oil

"Globalization is all about consolidation. Now that the world economy has become so centralized through the Globalists operations, they are going to continue to consolidate and blame it on the West's "evil" overconsumption of fossil fuels, while at the same time blocking the development and integration of renewable clean technologies.

In other words, Peak oil is a scam to create artificial scarcity and drive prices up. Meanwhile, alternative fuel technologies which have been around for decades are intentionally suppressed."

"Earlier this year Saudi Arabia reportedly increased its crude reserves by around 200 billion barrels. Saudi oil Is secure and plentiful, say officials."

"There have also been reports that Russia has vastly increased its reserves even beyond those of Saudi Arabia. Why would they do this if they believed there would be no more oil to get hold of? It seems clear that Russia is ready for unlimited future production of oil."

Whether the problem is portrayed as lack of resources or by MMGW being a pollutant, govt's can fight a battle on two fronts - blaming high energy prices on limited resource, whilst telling us MMGW is causing environmental disaster.....

As for depopulation, consider also for example the link entitled:

"The Club of Rome consulted with Kissinger before he issued his 1974 depopulation manifesto to President Carter. The plan calls for creating artificial food scarcity in order to depopulate the third world."

depopulation

"There is a single theme behind all our work-we must reduce population levels," said Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American case officer for the State Department's Office of Population Affairs (OPA).

"Either they [governments] do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it "The professionals," said Ferguson, "aren't interested in lowering population for humanitarian reasons. That sounds nice. We look at resources and environmental constraints. We look at our strategic needs, and we say that this country must lower its population-or else we will have trouble.

d) What is really meant by a "national population policy" ?


A very bleak future indeed !
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-02-2008, 07:34 AM   #48 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,089
Clippo is just starting out
Default

g hall, the following is sincerely meant:-

I am not trying to make you look foolish over your previously posted proposals. As I honestly said, I would like to believe that some or all are feasible. However, I hold view that the 'promise' that technology will save mankind is risky - even in the short term.
I am far more worried about the problems of Climate Change (& I accept that that you don't appear to believe those), and the projected problems of Population growth.
Clippo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 25-02-2008, 03:50 PM   #49 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
g hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: erehwon
Posts: 5,225
g hall has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Millennium3 View Post
The population concern was expressed in the first post ie that if Britain were obliged to take care of its own population in a time of global food shortage, presently, it could only provide for 17m of the 60m.
long pig anyone
__________________
"That government is best which governs least."
"This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries".
"To be "matter of fact" about the world is to blunder into fantasy --and dull fantasy at that, as the real world is strange and wonderful."


g hall is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 25-02-2008, 03:56 PM   #50 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
g hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: erehwon
Posts: 5,225
g hall has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clippo View Post
g hall, the following is sincerely meant:-

I am not trying to make you look foolish over your previously posted proposals. As I honestly said, I would like to believe that some or all are feasible. However, I hold view that the 'promise' that technology will save mankind is risky - even in the short term.
I am far more worried about the problems of Climate Change (& I accept that that you don't appear to believe those), and the projected problems of Population growth.
Cr@ppo I don't give a FFAARD about your likes or dislikes you parade yourself as a scientist and yet have no idea about the posts on future technology I have made

Your first attempt to "make me look foolish" only betrayed your own stupidity which you continue to hawk around this forum despite the continued exposure of it - now personally as I've said I don't give a Flying F*ck At A Rolling Donut because you are just not worth seriously debating with so be happy this is my LAST ever response to your delirious ravings
__________________
"That government is best which governs least."
"This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries".
"To be "matter of fact" about the world is to blunder into fantasy --and dull fantasy at that, as the real world is strange and wonderful."


g hall is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0