Thread: Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007.

rjt wrote:-

I am afraid there is more debate to be had and not just scientifically.

What has this to do with the Inhofe 400?

You're hopelessly confused and making a fool of yourself !

&

But do you not realise that the right to take decisions in these areas is being slowly eroded so is not the right of slef government the crucial one?

see my comment in another thread.

Especially for mpkdavies:-
If you go to Inhofe's link, you will see somewhere there that HE says HE is PROUD to have been called a Holocaust denier.
So who's the Nazi accolyte now?

Nice to see an open mind

Thank you for that compliment and recognising reality g hall

Originally Posted by Clippo

The scientific debate is over !!! it has been for many years ……

Oh dear, the debate does not look over to me, its funny how those MMGW scientists do not want to debate those that offer a different conclusion, instead they run and say the debate is over.

Supporters of MMGW obliviously want to take the credit for saving the earth when it begins to cool as it will naturally.

The greatest danger to the eco system and man is GMO, which is where the greens should be putting their efforts into.

Originally Posted by Clippo

The scientific debate is over !!!

What debate? There hasn't been a proper and fair debate yet.

The dictatorial attitude of some in the global warming alarmist lobby must not be tolerated.

We deserve a free and fair debate on this subject.

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

They just want their own way.

Yes - some in the global warming alarmist movement want us to listen and act while they do not listen and act themselves.

I believe the further one looks from the global warming alarmist movement the more one finds people with a genuinely low 'carbon footprint' (to use a politically correct term I do not like).

Just found this extract in relation to the Inhofe 400:-

......

The report listed the names of 413 scientists. With no Edward R. Murrow around, how do we know the list is a sham?

Adam Siegel over at Energy Smart has called attention to the yeoman work of Mark Johnson of Propeller.com, who went through every name on the Inhofe list, and posted his research on The Daily Green. Here's what he found:

84 have either taken money from, or are connected to, fossil fuel industries, or think tanks started by those industries.

49 are retired

44 are television weathermen

20 are economists

70 have no apparent expertise in climate science

Several supposed skeptics have publicly stated that they are very concerned about global warming, and support efforts to address it. One claims he was duped into signing the list and regrets it.

All we can think to say to Senator Inhofe: Good Night and Good Luck.

So, over a half are 'suspect'.

From:- Senator Joe McCarthy's Fake List of 413 Climate Skeptics | SolveClimate.com