What if the 'Man Made' GW Scientists are Right

Millennium3 · 20-01-2007, 02:10 PM

Seems just as likely as heaven/hell. If your bad you are reborn as a Somalian - if your good your born as ??? - your choice.

mkpdavies · 20-01-2007, 02:12 PM

An MEUP.

Millennium3 · 20-01-2007, 02:13 PM

Paradise

g hall · 20-01-2007, 03:33 PM

On Fri Jan 19, 2007 8:39 pm Millennium3 posted What if the 'Man Made' GW Scientists are Right

I'm sorry I'm having a problem with this concept :shock:

Millennium3 · 20-01-2007, 04:42 PM

I did qualify this with my opening post:

I know that there are many on this forum who believe that GW has not been caused by man, but merely a cyclic event. However, for those who do believe that mankind's activities has been the major cause and for those who can put aside their true convictions for a while - what [then] should be Britains response?

It may be preposterous to you - but, I think, there is little doubt that mainstream science does hold this view and increasingly so.

Besoeker · 20-01-2007, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by g hall

On Fri Jan 19, 2007 8:39 pm Millennium3 posted What if the 'Man Made' GW Scientists are Right

I'm sorry I'm having a problem with this concept :shock:

The "what if" part?

g hall · 21-01-2007, 07:02 PM

No this part

Quote:

'Man Made' GW Scientists are Right

:shock:

Besoeker · 21-01-2007, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by g hall

No this part

Quote:

'Man Made' GW Scientists are Right

:shock:

Some are right. Some are left.
:wink:

g hall · 22-01-2007, 05:18 PM

Besoeker

Quote:

Some are left.

These are the sinister ones :roll:

Millennium3 · 22-01-2007, 06:13 PM

A more precise description of what I was asking is:

What if those scientists who believe that global warming is caused by mankind's activities, are correct.

I asked this question to see if I could get a discussion going on what, in this case, should be Britain's response. Clearly, with many on the site believing the current GW being experienced is a natural occurance - it is difficult to get a serious discussion going.

It had occurred to me that, if viewed objectively, many people might not agree with the government's approach - which seems to be aimed at protecting vested interest - rather than tackling the problem head on.

Packaging - generally unnecessary - one would expect to be one of the first items to be tackled. I have previously mentioned extending the life of cars [also other high tech items] through refits, however, both of these are against the interests of the very large corporations.

20-01-2007, 02:12 PM	#32 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 30,604	An MEUP. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

20-01-2007, 02:10 PM	#31 (permalink)
Millennium3 Moderator Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Berkshire Posts: 3,865	Seems just as likely as heaven/hell. If your bad you are reborn as a Somalian - if your good your born as ??? - your choice.

20-01-2007, 02:13 PM	#33 (permalink)
Millennium3 Moderator Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Berkshire Posts: 3,865	Paradise

20-01-2007, 03:33 PM	#34 (permalink)
g hall Uber Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,927	On Fri Jan 19, 2007 8:39 pm Millennium3 posted What if the 'Man Made' GW Scientists are Right I'm sorry I'm having a problem with this concept :shock:

20-01-2007, 04:42 PM	#35 (permalink)
Millennium3 Moderator Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Berkshire Posts: 3,865	I did qualify this with my opening post: I know that there are many on this forum who believe that GW has not been caused by man, but merely a cyclic event. However, for those who do believe that mankind's activities has been the major cause and for those who can put aside their true convictions for a while - what [then] should be Britains response? It may be preposterous to you - but, I think, there is little doubt that mainstream science does hold this view and increasingly so.

22-01-2007, 06:13 PM	#40 (permalink)
Millennium3 Moderator Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Berkshire Posts: 3,865	A more precise description of what I was asking is: What if those scientists who believe that global warming is caused by mankind's activities, are correct. I asked this question to see if I could get a discussion going on what, in this case, should be Britain's response. Clearly, with many on the site believing the current GW being experienced is a natural occurance - it is difficult to get a serious discussion going. It had occurred to me that, if viewed objectively, many people might not agree with the government's approach - which seems to be aimed at protecting vested interest - rather than tackling the problem head on. Packaging - generally unnecessary - one would expect to be one of the first items to be tackled. I have previously mentioned extending the life of cars [also other high tech items] through refits, however, both of these are against the interests of the very large corporations.