Solar radiance

mkpdavies · 16-12-2006, 07:16 PM

This graph is from NASA.

Please can the voodooists explain to me why they think the fraction of a percent of co2, of which a fraction of a percent is man made and considering that co2 has a fraction of the heat retaining capabaliites of water vapour and considering Mars and Venus are both warming too.

Why do you think man made co2 overides all of this. Please use the amazing evidence that convinced a BBC presenter if you want.

Why do you completely and totaly ignore this solar factor and the fact other planets are heating slightly, just like they always have done?

Thanks

Unionist · 16-12-2006, 07:48 PM

You obviously haven't taken into account the emissions from the Mars Rover.

If it is anything like the Rover I once had it could explain everything!

mkpdavies · 17-12-2006, 01:12 AM

Violent Solar Storm Headed Towards Earth

http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=74121

Quote:

A violent explosion in the Sun's atmosphere is bombarding the Earth at over 1 M km/h, which will cause a brilliant light show while threatening to damage power grids and communications systems.

Images from the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory showed a bright flash near the Sun's equator overnight. Several of SOHO's sensors became temporarily overwhelmed by the amount of radiation emitted by the flares.

On December 13, a solar flare from sunspot 930 has sent a giant coronal mass ejection directly toward Earth. The X-Class flare was classified as one of the larger outbursts from the sun.

The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration issued an advisory reporting a geomagnetic storm in progress that has produced strong radiation blackouts. Strong to severe geomagnetic storming is expected through Friday. The advisory warns of potential disruptions over the next four days. The astronauts on the space shuttle will be safe from the sun's cloud of gas, NOAA said.

The danger from such strong solar flares is that they send out clouds of charged particles that could damage communication systems and power grids.

Nevertheless this solar flare will cause the so-called Northern Lights, which are a tremendous lights show.

This must help warm the planet up too.

BTW, at my old company (small American one, was the best ever to work for) had an issue where memory errors would occure, but were usualy single bit and correctable. However, rarely you would get a double bit error and they couldn;t be corrected, so the box would crash. We actually had a tech doc saying that this could have been down to solar flares! :shock:

If the company was still going today, I reckon they would be blaming man made co2 for causing some errors. Why not, the rest of the world sees it as fair game.

Besoeker · 17-12-2006, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

This graph is from NASA.

What are the units and scale of the y-axis?

Clippo · 17-12-2006, 02:24 PM

I draw your attention, yet again, to :-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_v...Global_warming

Read it!!! or lose any credibility for any further postings on solar induced GW.

If your intelligence is so low that you can't understand the body of it, scroll to the Global warming section or failing that the very last paragraph.

Hartlepool · 17-12-2006, 02:46 PM

Calm down,calm down,its only a Christmas windup.

I'm dreaming of a white Chrismas,
just like the ones we used to know.

The above was written half a century or more ago,anyone think there was a hidden message there? :wink:

mkpdavies · 17-12-2006, 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Besoeker

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

This graph is from NASA.

What are the units and scale of the y-axis?

Ask Nasa.

mkpdavies · 17-12-2006, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clippo

I draw your attention, yet again, to :-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_v...Global_warming

Read it!!! or lose any credibility for any further postings on solar induced GW.

If your intelligence is so low that you can't understand the body of it, scroll to the Global warming section or failing that the very last paragraph.

Quote:

The IPCC TAR view

Ahh, the view. In other words guesswork, but you just accept it as gospel, because it fits your own religious view. Looks like someone else needs an IQ boost to me.

Clippo · 17-12-2006, 08:52 PM

Your afraid to read it all because a) you haven't the wit to realise it is a balanced view of the work of solar radiation specialists & b) it exposes your complete idiotic views.

For the Nth time, where N is a very large number, you try to hide behind the 'religious' cult accusation smokescreen. Just exposes your own comprehensive intellectual shortcomings.

mkpdavies · 17-12-2006, 08:56 PM

I have read it. I believe some of it, but I think they underestimate the effect, like many other scientists have have read to.

You can keep calling me thick all you want. I understand it's part of your conditioning.

16-12-2006, 07:16 PM	#1 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 30,615	Solar radiance This graph is from NASA. Please can the voodooists explain to me why they think the fraction of a percent of co2, of which a fraction of a percent is man made and considering that co2 has a fraction of the heat retaining capabaliites of water vapour and considering Mars and Venus are both warming too. Why do you think man made co2 overides all of this. Please use the amazing evidence that convinced a BBC presenter if you want. Why do you completely and totaly ignore this solar factor and the fact other planets are heating slightly, just like they always have done? Thanks __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

17-12-2006, 08:56 PM	#10 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 30,615	I have read it. I believe some of it, but I think they underestimate the effect, like many other scientists have have read to. You can keep calling me thick all you want. I understand it's part of your conditioning. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

16-12-2006, 07:48 PM	#2 (permalink)
Unionist Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 1,026	You obviously haven't taken into account the emissions from the Mars Rover. If it is anything like the Rover I once had it could explain everything!

17-12-2006, 02:24 PM	#5 (permalink)
Clippo Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Cheshire Posts: 1,856	I draw your attention, yet again, to :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_v...Global_warming Read it!!! or lose any credibility for any further postings on solar induced GW. If your intelligence is so low that you can't understand the body of it, scroll to the Global warming section or failing that the very last paragraph.

17-12-2006, 02:46 PM	#6 (permalink)
Hartlepool Uber Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: North East England Posts: 6,574	Calm down,calm down,its only a Christmas windup. I'm dreaming of a white Chrismas, just like the ones we used to know. The above was written half a century or more ago,anyone think there was a hidden message there? :wink:

17-12-2006, 08:52 PM	#9 (permalink)
Clippo Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Cheshire Posts: 1,856	Your afraid to read it all because a) you haven't the wit to realise it is a balanced view of the work of solar radiation specialists & b) it exposes your complete idiotic views. For the Nth time, where N is a very large number, you try to hide behind the 'religious' cult accusation smokescreen. Just exposes your own comprehensive intellectual shortcomings.