All you dingbats crapping yourself over climate change

mkpdavies · 13-12-2006, 11:23 AM

Vote for the polar bear in extinct too. They are going to need a new home in a few decades, until the next ice age comes anyway.

Besoeker · 13-12-2006, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

No, we must blame us all the time. Then we can tax us and control us, its the the way of the religous order of hysteria.

Amen.

Did you look at the other graphs I posted ?

mkpdavies · 14-12-2006, 03:05 AM

Besoeker · 14-12-2006, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

Yep.

Did you notice anything about current levels of CO2?

mkpdavies · 14-12-2006, 12:47 PM

Still near the lows of history.

Besoeker · 14-12-2006, 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

Still near the lows of history.

See that little red arrow on the top left?
With the legend "Present CO2 level?

mkpdavies · 14-12-2006, 06:07 PM

You've missed a few billions years off that graph dude.

Picking a period when co2 has hit rock bottom, then getting all exited as it barely inches upwards when compared to historical averages, hardly sends me into a frenzy.

Clippo · 14-12-2006, 06:19 PM

From:-
http://environment.guardian.co.uk/cl...970360,00.html

I found this news piece accidentally today. Although it mainly about the climatic dangers of nuclear war, the extracts below are relevant to what I posted earlier in this thread.

According to the research, tens of millions of people would die, global temperatures would crash and most of the world would be unable to grow crops for more than five years after a conflict.
There is a precedent for this sort of climactic change: major volcanic eruptions in the past have thrown global ecosystems into temporary turmoil.
The eruption of Mount Tambora in 1815 was the biggest such event on record. The resulting cloud of ash spread around the world and caused crops to fail the following year in North America and Europe, resulting in the worst famine of the century.

Besoeker · 14-12-2006, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

Picking a period when co2 has hit rock bottom, then getting all exited as it barely inches upwards when compared to historical averages, hardly sends me into a frenzy.

As I expected, you completely missed the point.
I didn't pick that time period - you did. Look at the other thread.
You presented a graph of CO2 over that exact same period (from the same source)when you were claiming that man-made climate change is a sham.
I'm just pointing out that the same information from the same source can be used to support either point of view.
I'm not, as you seem to infer, using it to prove or disprove anything about human causal relationship with climate change.

mkpdavies · 14-12-2006, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Besoeker

As I expected, you completely missed the point.
I didn't pick that time period - you did. Look at the other thread.
You presented a graph of CO2 over that exact same period (from the same source)when you were claiming that man-made climate change is a sham.
I'm just pointing out that the same information from the same source can be used to support either point of view.
I'm not, as you seem to infer, using it to prove or disprove anything about human causal relationship with climate change.

Where did I say I was picking at you? You pointed bit of the graph that I find no big deal and I showed you why I think it is no big deal. End of.

13-12-2006, 11:23 AM	#11 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 30,604	Vote for the polar bear in extinct too. They are going to need a new home in a few decades, until the next ice age comes anyway. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

14-12-2006, 03:05 AM	#13 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 30,604	Yep. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

14-12-2006, 12:47 PM	#15 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 30,604	Still near the lows of history. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

14-12-2006, 06:07 PM	#17 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 30,604	You've missed a few billions years off that graph dude. Picking a period when co2 has hit rock bottom, then getting all exited as it barely inches upwards when compared to historical averages, hardly sends me into a frenzy. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

14-12-2006, 06:19 PM	#18 (permalink)
Clippo Uber Member Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Cheshire Posts: 2,089	From:- http://environment.guardian.co.uk/cl...970360,00.html I found this news piece accidentally today. Although it mainly about the climatic dangers of nuclear war, the extracts below are relevant to what I posted earlier in this thread. According to the research, tens of millions of people would die, global temperatures would crash and most of the world would be unable to grow crops for more than five years after a conflict. There is a precedent for this sort of climactic change: major volcanic eruptions in the past have thrown global ecosystems into temporary turmoil. The eruption of Mount Tambora in 1815 was the biggest such event on record. The resulting cloud of ash spread around the world and caused crops to fail the following year in North America and Europe, resulting in the worst famine of the century.