Monckton responds to Skeptical Science | Watts Up With That?
Mr. John Cook, who runs a website puzzlingly entitled Skeptical Science” (for he is not in the least sceptical of the “official” position) seems annoyed that I won the 2011 televised debate with Dr. Denniss of the Australia Institute, and has published a commentary on what I said. It has been suggested that I should reply to the commentary. So, seriatim, I shall consider the points made. Mr. Cook’s comments are in Roman face: my replies are in bold face. Since Mr. Cook accuses me of lying, I have asked him to be good enough to make sure that this reply to his commentary is posted on his website in the interest of balance.
Temperatures and sea level may go down as well as up, terms and conditions apply.
LORD??? Christopher Monckton a non-scientist debates climate change with an economist.
Riveting stuff.
Next, we'll have a plumber debate with an electrical engineer on the importance of sliced bread in relation to the incidence of gun crime in downtown Atlanta and the declining bee population.....
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
"My Lords, that's me"
Except he isn't.
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
And he claims to be a reasonably competent mathematician.....
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
Bookmarks