Thread: Would You Trust Nasa. Episode 2

Lesson 1 Graphs n' Charts

A serious error was found in the NASA temperature data for the United States in 2007. When corrected, it was determined that the warmest year in the past 100 years was not in 1998 and 2006 as previously believed, but was 1934, followed 1998. 1921 became the third hottest year, followed by 2006 and 1933. Out of the five hottest years, three occurred in the 1920s and 30s and only two were in the past 10 years. Notice that the US data do not have the same steep increase in temperature shown in the corrupted data of Britain's Climate Research Unit's data in the graph above. This dramatically changes scientists understanding of the importance of the warming that has occurred since 1975. The period between 1995 and 2009 is no warmer than the period between 1920 and 1935. This error in the NASA data has lead to discoveries of other errors in the data which are raising concern about data integrity of NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies.

Obviously from a wingnut website - Every body else agrees that 1995-2010 had 9/10 of the hottest years measured. Ironically. earlier today I found this which thoroughly debunks your continued denial :-

Baked Curry: The BEST Way to Hide the Incline

some really effective 'interactive graphs which show how denier cherry-pickers work to deceive.

I'm not discussing this topic any more - because it is against debating guidelines no.2.

Is this you on realclimate Clippo ?

RealClimate: Is Sea-Level Rise Accelerating?

Post 6 ?

If so I see that you contribute to scientific discussion with your expert knowledge of Climate Science and Statistics there too.

Have Houston and/or Dean any known links to ‘doubt’ organisations?

I would never have thought of asking that question Clippo, well done. Did you get your answer?
Presumably the science of Houston and Dean is very sound, otherwise you would have debated that.