Your Ad Here
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 71 to 78 of 78

Thread: China the only country tackling THE green issue?

  1. #71
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    New South Wales
    Posts
    4,503

    Default

    "Bambi fundamentalists are freedom fighters not terrorists."
    Have you ever been between 2 charging bull elk? It's pitiful to see a poor wounded lion whimpering when a ferocious horn-armoured buck has gored it. There were lovely young lion cubs all over the Middle East until Muslim camel deer took over. They're ripping up the Amazon lion park as we speak.

  2. #72
    Trusted Member Roland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,479

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chimera View Post
    Have you ever been between 2 charging bull elk?
    No I can't say I have, I did get chased out of a field by one when I was a kid is that close enough?

    It's pitiful to see a poor wounded lion whimpering when a ferocious horn-armoured buck has gored it. There were lovely young lion cubs all over the Middle East until Muslim camel deer took over. They're ripping up the Amazon lion park as we speak.
    My god that's awful. It would be difficult strategically for us to attack the ferocious horn-armoured buck as all NATO troops are in the middle east. But I can't believe the western world are just sitting back and doing nothing about saving the lion from Muslim fundamentalist camels. Then we wonder why lions eat us.
    The road to hell is paved in good intention.

  3. #73
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    New South Wales
    Posts
    4,503

    Default

    And we'll probably give them a virus so crocodiles will need to develop longer legs. It's a jungle out there.

  4. #74

    Default

    The planet can only sustain a given amount of people and we have exceeded that amount some time ago. We have to start making the kind of hard choices that realy hurt like china and there one child per couple rule.

  5. #75
    Trusted Member Tim the plumber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sheffield
    Posts
    1,588

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kevinpeter26 View Post
    The planet can only sustain a given amount of people and we have exceeded that amount some time ago. We have to start making the kind of hard choices that realy hurt like china and there one child per couple rule.
    The amount of people which the planet can support has been exceeded very often. Fortunately the ingenuity of lots of people has resulted in improved food supply to the point today where we use a sizable percentage of food to make fuel. There is plenty of food.
    I've finally got a web site to work!! See my page thingy.

  6. #76
    Trusted Member Roland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,479

    Default

    If you look into the history of the Eugenics movement, population reduction is basically 'speak' for removing bad gene pools such as blacks, poor, dysfunctional family lines, long term unemployed etc...

    Isn't it a strange irony that it seems the only people who are interested in removing themselves from existence, are white, middle class, environmentalists exactly the people that were supposed to be left to genetically flourish on mother earth.
    The road to hell is paved in good intention.

  7. #77
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jm51 View Post
    While I agree that we will run out of resources in the not to distant future, and alternate energy is a must we are piddling in the wind unless we do something about the population boom.

    The planet can only sustain a given amount of people and we have exceeded that amount some time ago. We have to start making the kind of hard choices that realy hurt like china and there one child per couple rule.

    Heard on the news the other day that total population is now 7 Billion (they think) may be more. We are like germs polluting our own planet, control ourselves or nature wil do it for us.

    Our own country can at best support 50 million people if we cultivate every inch of land. Some people suggest the 30 million is nearer the figure and each year we build for immigrants more homes on more agriculture land making matters worst. One day we will run out of money to purchase imports of food. We now have to import 51% of what we eat.

  8. #78
    Trusted Member Tim the plumber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sheffield
    Posts
    1,588

    Default

    We use food as fuel. Only a little here but... The amount of rich land in use for vines and other pure luxuary crops could be used for food, however, there is no need. Trade is the best way to get a stable and reliable supply of food. It is the agricultural communities which starve when they have a bad harvest. Think Irish potatoe famine compaired the the famous fictitious Venitian hunger of 1593 when there was a temporary lack of cake. If you are in a trading network you can switch sources.
    I've finally got a web site to work!! See my page thingy.

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •