He shouldnt just offer he should just do it, he could, just maybe, leave with a modicum of dignity.
What was hardly a secret? I accept as Mr Uncles says at 10.30pm here that the post was a result of the post by Mr Dixon but that does not mean there was no breach of confidentiality by Mr Uncles in his COSG post. It was packed full of confidential information not present in the post by Mr Dixon and confirms other information presented by Mr Dixon. Both have breached confidentiality so if one person's position is untenable then it surely follows that both person's positions are untenable. The reasoned response of the ED (if any response should ever have been made) would be a collective statement that NC meetings are confidential and that the party will not comment on inaccurate and misleading reports of such meetings.
Little Englander
Not; Little Englander (sour) or LittleEnglander
He would have agreed anyway, like the sinn fien letter![]()
Oh dear - This post has all the fingerprints of a certain Mr S Uncles all over it.
"Following the invitation by Derek Hilling the national party secretary of The English Democrats to Richard Barnbrook" - What invitation? Derek and the rest of the NC were unaware that Barnbrook would be addressing the meeting on Saturday. I have a copy of the agenda sat in front of me now, and of the 17 points on it, not one regards a certain Richard Barnbrook addressing the NC of The English Democrats. A vote of no confidence in Uncles was proposed at the meeting, and deemed not admissable as it was not on the agenda - Barnbrook was only allowed to address the NC because it was pointed out that Item 12 (Membership applications from ex BNP members - CV?/RC?) could be used to justify it, and as he doesn't drive and had to be ferried up by another NC member, he shouldn't be left to sit in the foyer on his own (A joke was cracked that we could have a whip round for his train back if necessary)
If I attended as a guest of Roger Cooper, why was item 4 on the agenda titled "Allegations of improper conduct against Steve Uncles - CD & SU" ? Would a guest be on the agenda? Indeed, why have I been at every NC meeting in my capacity as Roger Cooper's deputy for the last 6 months, and have held his proxy vote on the previous 4?
The comment about confidentiality is a joke - Uncles posts whatever he sees fit from these meetings, and has done for a long time. Besides which, I put the post up last night because much of what I confirmed had already leaked out anyway, and was damaging the party. I have frequently said that many of these items need to be addressed in the way of a formal party statement that quells rumours and gives the reality of any situation - Unfortunately, you only have to look at who the communications officer is to see why things have been allowed to fester so long.
NORTHUMBRIAN - I have tried to address these issues within the party for months - You have been inside, so know what goes on. I was encouraged to get after Uncles and have it out at The December NC, but the resolve was gone by January. It is impossible to get an EGM going, because only certain people at the top of the party (And Eddy Butler/Limelight) have the full party lists - It takes me months to get an updated area list for Hillingdon, let alone anywhere else (Which I am not entitled to anyway).
How can I get the party to deal with the behaviour of Steve Uncles if they are unaware of it? Hence my use of his favourite medium - The one where he has mocked suicide victims, insulted the Irish, referred to the ED as 'Right Wing', the list goes on.
Bookmarks