No it does not follow, old man.
Were I to be the only person in the world who campaigned for snails to be protected by law, and someone criticised me because I was abusive to people on public transport, that would not make that person "anti-snail".
Your logic would be deemed feeble in a dim fifth-former - you're well past it aren't you?![]()
Gareth Young and his Snail Campaign - now that is really funny
Last edited by Steve Uncles; 25-08-2010 at 05:53 PM.
Ah, you can't refute what I said then - so instead you fall back on the insults against Toque, who apparently is me in your fevered mind. And to think that some on here thought you were intelligent (although never as intelligent as you thought yourself to be)! But you're not much cop really are you old fella?
No get it right Seb, if your not in the party with him you are not English and anti English.
Steve Mr Rob and cassie are undertaking the same conversation keep up, or do you need a book for that too
Or Google it![]()
Did you just pop in to see how your pet was doing Steve? Not very well I'm afraid, he doesn't defend your views or your party very effectively, so best still kept at a distance so you can disassociate yourself from him if needs beIt's a good tactic, surprised you came up with it!
![]()
Whether it was his opinion or not is beside the point, that it was vulgarly expressed and hardly closely argued, but more like prejudiced ranting.
I would have thought that it was clear beyond peradventure that the English Democrats could well have done without Lightfoot's crudely expressed and biassed opinions which enlighted no one but merely indulged his own anti-English prejudices.
Who was embarrassed? I suspect that the alleged 'embarrassment' is in your mind, and you trot out that notion in order to bolster a weak position.
If that was the work of an alleged university educated polymath in action, it was woefully inadequate. However, you are entitled to your opinion.
If he did, we are still short of any concrete facts.
You are one of those making unsubstantiated claims about Lightfoot's achievements and making an unnecessary, less than impartial comparison with Uncles.
Now you've shifted from my point about the English Democrats Party to theorising about individuals' possible opinions. Why would I want to entertain that particular notion in relation to the point I argued?
This is aside from the point! Whether they do it well or badly, there is no other political party which puts England and the English at the forefront of their policies and objectives. Moreover, they have not "taken it upon themselves to represent" you as an Englishman or anyone else as such, they merely afford a choice, and it is open to other parties to offer similar choices. The fact is that, apart from the EIP, they don't, and you disparaging the EDP doesn't change that one iota . . . although I can understand that you might want to get away from that fact as rapidly as possible.
.
Bookmarks