+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4
FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Results 31 to 40 of 40

Thread: Fun with bloggers who hate their County "England"

  1. #31
    Uber Member Danny has some supporters
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,974

    Quote Originally Posted by English Patriot View Post
    Toque you are very badly mis informed on this one. I have read your forum with interest over the years but you seem very anti English Democrat even though they represent much have what you say you support.

    toque loves labour didnt you know.

  2. #32
    On A Break cassie has some supporters
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    5,697

    Gareth Young is a self-appointed judge of the English Democrats who, because he was upset by Steven Uncles sometime ago, discounts all the policies adopted by members in a series of general meetings, and attempts to portray the party in an adverse light with a series of innuendos. He implies that there is something dreadful about any association, however tenuous, the EFP - as though the EFP is contagious. Not once does he explain precisely what are his professed objections to the EFP.

    It should be noted that Mr Young does not belong to any political party, and he expresses great pride in not having been a member of any political party. Therefore he can attack and criticise any political party at will, safe in the knowledge that he doesn't have a political party with all its imperfections to defend. How he expects his professed support for a separate parliament for England to be effected without the use of a political party, Gareth has yet to explain.

    He, and now Mr Rob and Peekay [Paul Kingsnorth] have all joined forces to attack and to demean the EDP, but they have nothing to say about the big three Brit parties who have all been complicit in creating a discriminatory situation for England but who, with their combined 95% of MPs, have presided over the biggest scandal in Westminster itself for decades. Oh no! Their strictures are reserved for the English Democrats, the major political party most likely to advance England's cause.

    Their one-sided, anti-white sanctimony is such that none of them has any criticism of the dozens of 'black only' bodies with public funding which exist in England today. Oh no! Their contrived concern is not for their own people, not for true fairness and equality, not for a diversity which includes the white English, but for ensuring that not a word, not a syllable is uttered of which they in their precious wisdom do not approve.

    This is the true nature of these self-appointed, unelected 'sages'. They endeavour to appear balanced and reasoned, when the facts show that they are highly selected, arbitrarily abusive and, when cornered on articular issues, move to other allegations. One has only to look at other threads here to see the intemperate insults and abuse levelled at me . . . 'idiot', 'bigot' to cite but two.

    Do not be deceived. These individuals are destructive and have nothing practical or constructive to offer in place of the party they attack. If they are remotely as intelligent as they claim, they do this knowingly to impair attempts to remedy the situation of England and her people - all predicated, you understand, on the misdeeds of Steven Uncles. How unbalanced can you get? As one of the facetious sods posted in reply to me elsewhere, that tells us all we need to know.

    .

  3. #33
    Newbie teggers is just starting out
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    SW England
    Posts
    5

    Blogs versus Forums

    Have I missed something?- or is a 'blog' not open for allcomers to read- whereas a 'forum' has members with the privacy to discuss whatever they like , without having to go public on every point they make.
    To have to defend an opinion at every stage is where we have been driven as citizens- whereas spin is fed back endlessly,mostly at direct or indirect public expense (it's called politics, with a dirty 'P')

  4. #34
    On A Break cassie has some supporters
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    5,697

    Quote Originally Posted by teggers View Post
    Have I missed something?- or is a 'blog' not open for allcomers to read- whereas a 'forum' has members with the privacy to discuss whatever they like , without having to go public on every point they make.
    To have to defend an opinion at every stage is where we have been driven as citizens- whereas spin is fed back endlessly,mostly at direct or indirect public expense (it's called politics, with a dirty 'P')
    Yeah! You've missed a lot, otherwise you wouldn't need to go around - as old Youngy does - inventing rules for others. It's a sure sign of inadequacy!

    Forum, shmorum, blogs, shmogs! Who cares, so long as they're interesting!

    .

  5. #35
    Newbie teggers is just starting out
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    SW England
    Posts
    5

    I invented the rules for forums??
    You are obviously an anarchist who would like to have no rules whatsoever and revel in the ensuing mess.
    The EU is a bit like this, in an 'anti matter' way- in that it lives by a multiplicity of rules equally confusing as your wish to be free of them- apparently!

  6. #36
    Junior Member Peekay is just starting out
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    25

    He, and now Mr Rob and Peekay [Paul Kingsnorth] have all joined forces to attack and to demean the EDP, but they have nothing to say about the big three Brit parties who have all been complicit in creating a discriminatory situation for England but who, with their combined 95% of MPs, have presided over the biggest scandal in Westminster itself for decades. Oh no! Their strictures are reserved for the English Democrats, the major political party most likely to advance England's cause.

    Their one-sided, anti-white sanctimony is such that none of them has any criticism of the dozens of 'black only' bodies with public funding which exist in England today. Oh no! Their contrived concern is not for their own people, not for true fairness and equality, not for a diversity which includes the white English, but for ensuring that not a word, not a syllable is uttered of which they in their precious wisdom do not approve.

    This is the true nature of these self-appointed, unelected 'sages'. They endeavour to appear balanced and reasoned, when the facts show that they are highly selected, arbitrarily abusive and, when cornered on articular issues, move to other allegations. One has only to look at other threads here to see the intemperate insults and abuse levelled at me . . . 'idiot', 'bigot' to cite but two.
    Oh dear oh dear oh dear.

    Let's see now:

    1. If you think that I have 'nothing to say about the big three parties', you've obviously read nothing I've written for the last ten years.

    2. Initially interested in the EDP when I first heard about them, I have since become repulsed by the activities of its senior people. This post is a good example of why no reasonable person would vote for you. The last straw was your alliance with the England First Party in these coming elections. Astonishingly, you ask Gareth why he objects to this. Perhaps he has a problem, as I do, with a party which advocates repatriation of non-whites and the banning of all 'non-European religions' in England (as an aside, I wonder if this includes Christianity, which is of course, like Islam, a middle eastern religion. Are we all going back to worshipping Woden and Thunor?)

    3. This discussion about English politics then quickly and magically segues into a discussion about - wait for it - white people! And there it is - the real agenda exposed for all to see. Cassie is here to 'defend' white people. And that is precisely why I won't touch the EDP with a bargepole. Not because I am 'anti white' (which really would make me self-hating) but because I don't give a **** about skin colour. Note the automatic assumption, btw, that disagreeing with Cassie means I am a 'liberal self-hater' who favours positive discrimination. Note also the talk of 'their own people'; white people in other words. If I liked hearing this kind of thing I would vote for the BNP, who are also in favour of 'defending' white people and creating an English parliament and have a much better chance at the elections than the EDP. Actually I'll be running a mile from both.

    4. As for being an 'unelected self-appointed sage' - which of these words doesn't also apply to you, Cassie? Apart from the last one, obviously.

    At the end of the day you can have as many fights on silly forums as you like, but you are going to get nowhere in politics with a 'strategy' like this. I don't expect you to believe that, but it will prove to be true. In the meantime, I await the coming of a democratic, non-racist English party that is not run by idiots.

  7. #37
    Newbie teggers is just starting out
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    SW England
    Posts
    5

    Cassie: My first post was in answer to this-
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveShark View Post
    Will Mr Uncles test his arguments and debating skills in the open and away from the safety of this forum?
    Or will he continue to cower in his bunker?
    not yours previously to your last, which I happen to generally empathise with...
    PS :My post about your anachistic tendencies seems to have evaporated..
    Last edited by teggers; 01-06-2009 at 11:32 AM.

  8. #38
    On A Break cassie has some supporters
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    5,697

    Quote Originally Posted by teggers View Post
    Cassie: My first post was in answer to this-


    not yours previously to your last, which I happen to generally empathise with...
    PS :My post about your anachistic tendencies seems to have evaporated..
    I am suitably chastened!


    .

  9. #39
    Newbie teggers is just starting out
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    SW England
    Posts
    5

    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    Oh dear oh dear oh dear.

    In the meantime, I await the coming of a democratic, non-racist English party that is not run by idiots.
    Waiting for ??
    Maybe, after all the medieval clearing out of any radical blood that left a population bereft of many spirited types, we are currently a Churchill short of an opposition in England to the commune-ists on all our borders?
    However , having a few side issues running in the formation of a true opposition as not so important as the direction many English supporters are moving.
    If you have more latent ability than others in the running - then you should be up there running too [if you're not already] let us know. Posting isn't exactly activism.

    Also , a tip to all - don't drink too much tap water or tea- Fluoride is not exactly good for 'the fighting spirit'. & that attribute will be needed for a long while yet!
    Last edited by teggers; 01-06-2009 at 11:53 AM. Reason: Expansion

  10. #40
    On A Break cassie has some supporters
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    5,697

    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    Oh dear oh dear oh dear.

    Let's see now:
    You see? That'll make a change.

    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    1. If you think that I have 'nothing to say about the big three parties', you've obviously read nothing I've written for the last ten years.
    True, and most of the generalised and biassed drivel you've posted here inclines me not to bother and to recommend that others not bother also!

    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    2. Initially interested in the EDP when I first heard about them, I have since become repulsed by the activities of its senior people.
    This is typical of the general, biassed drivel to which I refer.
    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    This post is a good example of why no reasonable person would vote for you.
    ?????????????? Are we expected to be mind readers? Trouble is, I don't possess a microscope!
    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    The last straw was your alliance with the England First Party in these coming elections.
    Which 'alliance' is this? May we have full details?
    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    Astonishingly, you ask Gareth why he objects to this.
    Yes, I suppose it is astonishing to you, because in your conceit, you expect everyone to agree (without question) to your prejudices.
    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    Perhaps he has a problem, as I do, with a party which advocates repatriation of non-whites and the banning of all 'non-European religions' in England (as an aside, I wonder if this includes Christianity, which is of course, like Islam, a middle eastern religion. Are we all going back to worshipping Woden and Thunor?)
    Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps, perhaps, perhaps! [a la Wizard of Oz] Why don't you say outright instead all these girlie hints? Are you not up to the job of stating what you mean in an outright way? Are you afraid that someone might challenge you?

    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    3. This discussion about English politics then quickly and magically segues into a discussion about - wait for it - white people! And there it is - the real agenda exposed for all to see.
    Again, why don't you state in an upright, honest way exactly what you mean, instead of snidely suggesting something is unsavoury and unacceptable here!
    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    Cassie is here to 'defend' white people.
    May we be given full particulars of your objections to this?
    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    And that is precisely why I won't touch the EDP with a bargepole. Not because I am 'anti white' (which really would make me self-hating) but because I don't give a **** about skin colour.
    Your very words give the lie to this claim. In fact, your failure to engage with the arguments is evidence that you are biassed.
    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    Note the automatic assumption, btw, that disagreeing with Cassie means I am a 'liberal self-hater' who favours positive discrimination.
    No, note the dishonest and insidious way Paul Kingsnorth attempts to misrepresent me in order to bolster his feeble position.
    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    Note also the talk of 'their own people'; white people in other words.
    Again, note the dishonest and insidious way Paul Kingsnorth attempts to misrepresent me in order to bolster his feeble position.
    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    If I liked hearing this kind of thing I would vote for the BNP, who are also in favour of 'defending' white people and creating an English parliament and have a much better chance at the elections than the EDP. Actually I'll be running a mile from both.
    Having put up an Aunt Sally, Paul Kingsnorth applies all his limited mental powers to attacking it! Pathetic!

    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    4. As for being an 'unelected self-appointed sage' - which of these words doesn't also apply to you, Cassie? Apart from the last one, obviously.
    No comment, other than to note that the observation struck home.

    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    At the end of the day you can have as many fights on silly forums as you like, but you are going to get nowhere in politics with a 'strategy' like this. I don't expect you to believe that, but it will prove to be true.
    I merely expose the intellectual and moral pretensions of self-important, self-justifying, sanctimonious folk like you Paul. You are the one who lost his temper, who indulged in childish abuse. Odd how you seem to like coming back for more 'verbal besting' from those you profess to regard as 'idiots'. It doesn't say much for you, does it?
    Quote Originally Posted by Peekay View Post
    In the meantime, I await the coming of a democratic, non-racist English party that is not run by idiots.
    They will be [idiots, I mean] if they need to have your approval.

    .

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4
FirstFirst ... 2 3 4

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts