British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > English Democrats


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14-05-2008, 11:52 PM   #61 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, England
Posts: 1,416
Party: Free England Party
Northumbrian is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shagpile View Post
An independent Scotland would be able to defend itself. I'm amased that self determination should be reduced to how an independent nation might defend itself. Just as silly would be to ask how England, Wales or NI would defend themselves without Scotland. Especially given the context you suggest.

BTW Luxembourg must be in extrime peril.
If a small country like Israel can defend itself...

In any case, I wouldn't have thought a country like Scotland would have many enemies.
Northumbrian is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 15-05-2008, 10:29 AM   #62 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,849
cassie is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shagpile View Post

4. I was meaning (with regard to) unionist spin that Scotland, if it became independent would be barred from membership of the EU. Naturally if that were true, it would also be true for the 'rump of the UK. Would it not?
I see no reason why an independent Scotland could not be a member of the EU in its own right just as the Czech and Slovak republics (for example) were able to join after they had separated. Indeed, those promoting separation for England cite the alleged desire in Scotland for continued EU membership as one of the advantages for England, enabling the English more easily to divest themselves of EU membership!

However, what the precise mechanics would be I really do not know. It is be borne in mind that, to join the EU, an applicant state must meet certain specified criteria, one of which now is to adopt the Euro. I do not know whether Scotland would meet all the other criteria.

It seems to me that, as such a situation develops in the wake of (say) clear majorities in both England and Scotland for Scotland if that is what she wishes to leave the UK, there will be contact with both the EU Council of Ministers and the EU Commission about the consequences. In theory, it is possible for Scotland and the rest of the UK to remain in separate membership of the EU, but many of us believe that both the EU Commission and other EU Members states will be as awkward as possible in order to draw out any processes and to retain England & Co in membership as long as possible quite simply because we are a net contributor!

Ultimately, it is our status as net contributor which will enable us to say: "Up with this we will no longer put and, if you don't reach a settlement with us by such and such date, we will regard ourselves as no longer members and contributors with immediate effect!" In the meantime, we would expect our politicians to be negotiating alternative arrangements with EFTA (or whatever it's called nowadays), the North America mob and a number of Commonwealth Member countries.


-----------------
cassie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 15-05-2008, 12:59 PM   #63 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
shagpile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Nomad
Posts: 98
shagpile is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cassie View Post
I see no reason why an independent Scotland could not be a member of the EU in its own right just as the Czech and Slovak republics (for example) were able to join after they had separated. Indeed, those promoting separation for England cite the alleged desire in Scotland for continued EU membership as one of the advantages for England, enabling the English more easily to divest themselves of EU membership!

However, what the precise mechanics would be I really do not know. It is be borne in mind that, to join the EU, an applicant state must meet certain specified criteria, one of which now is to adopt the Euro. I do not know whether Scotland would meet all the other criteria.

It seems to me that, as such a situation develops in the wake of (say) clear majorities in both England and Scotland for Scotland if that is what she wishes to leave the UK, there will be contact with both the EU Council of Ministers and the EU Commission about the consequences. In theory, it is possible for Scotland and the rest of the UK to remain in separate membership of the EU, but many of us believe that both the EU Commission and other EU Members states will be as awkward as possible in order to draw out any processes and to retain England & Co in membership as long as possible quite simply because we are a net contributor!

Ultimately, it is our status as net contributor which will enable us to say: "Up with this we will no longer put and, if you don't reach a settlement with us by such and such date, we will regard ourselves as no longer members and contributors with immediate effect!" In the meantime, we would expect our politicians to be negotiating alternative arrangements with EFTA (or whatever it's called nowadays), the North America mob and a number of Commonwealth Member countries.


-----------------
Pretty much agree with that Cassie, although, if Scotland had to re-apply for EU membership, so surely would the 'rump of the UK'. Either both would be eligible or neither.

I do not see the relevance of 'the rump of the UK' having a say on Scottish independence. It's up to the Scots. Again, how would a NO vote from England, Wales or NI be relevant or binding on the Scots?
shagpile is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 15-05-2008, 01:32 PM   #64 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,849
cassie is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shagpile View Post

I do not see the relevance of 'the rump of the UK' having a say on Scottish independence. It's up to the Scots. Again, how would a NO vote from England, Wales or NI be relevant or binding on the Scots?
I agree that the vote in Scotland is crucial and, therefore, would be expected to prevail over and above a contrary result elsewhere in the UK.

However, if the turnout in Scotland was low - say 30% - and the result was 50.1% in favour, compared with a high turnout in England - say 70% - and the result was 55% against Scottish independence, very careful consideration would need to be given by Parliament bearing in mind that the electorate in Scotland is some 3.9 million and in England nearly 38 million, of which a proportion is emigre Scots.

A more definitive result might be obtained by re-running the referendum within a short time, which would enable those who did not take the matter seriously and who abstained to participate in a second ballot.

Incidentally, given that the total population of Scotland is around 5 million and that of the rest of the UK exceeds 55 million, your use of the word 'rump' is both misleading and inaccurate but, I suppose, to be expected from someone whose first language is not English.




------------------------------
cassie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 15-05-2008, 02:43 PM   #65 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default Scotland, British armed forces

Quote:
Originally Posted by shagpile View Post
An independent Scotland would be able to defend itself.
Scotland is better of under the protection of the British armed forces - as we all are.
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 15-05-2008, 03:36 PM   #66 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 635
ANGLO-STAFFS is just starting out
Default

Just a small point. As Scotland have the bases and missile storage dumps would they get to keep the Nuki Subs?
ANGLO-STAFFS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 15-05-2008, 05:57 PM   #67 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,849
cassie is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ANGLO-STAFFS View Post
Just a small point. As Scotland have the bases and missile storage dumps would they get to keep the Nuki Subs?
According to Salmond, they want rid of them!

We'll have 'em back with our English Armed Forces!


_____________
cassie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 15-05-2008, 09:39 PM   #68 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, England
Posts: 1,416
Party: Free England Party
Northumbrian is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Britannist View Post
Scotland is better of under the protection of the British armed forces - as we all are.
From whom? The only threats we have are from civilians setting off bombs.
Northumbrian is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2008, 11:36 PM   #69 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
shagpile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Nomad
Posts: 98
shagpile is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cassie View Post
Incidentally, given that the total population of Scotland is around 5 million and that of the rest of the UK exceeds 55 million, your use of the word 'rump' is both misleading and inaccurate but, I suppose, to be expected from someone whose first language is not English.
I also thought along those lines when I first read that expression. However, I never coined the phrase. Anyway language evolves does it not?
shagpile is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2008, 11:57 PM   #70 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
shagpile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Nomad
Posts: 98
shagpile is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cassie View Post
However, if the turnout in Scotland was low - say 30% - and the result was 50.1% in favour, compared with a high turnout in England - say 70% - and the result was 55% against Scottish independence, very careful consideration would need to be given by Parliament bearing in mind that the electorate in Scotland is some 3.9 million and in England nearly 38 million, of which a proportion is emigre Scots.
Irrespective of the turnout, and size of margin for independence. The correct response from Westminster (as required by international law, and the treaties the UK is signatory to) would be to negotiate that wish for independence with the Scottish Parliament.

It does not matter what ex-pat Scots wish for, unless their domicile and residence is in Scotland.

If I for example wish to paint my toilet seat an awful shade of pink, what business of the neighbours would it be. It might be of importance to members of my family, IF THEY LIVED WITH ME.
shagpile is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0