British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > English Democrats


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-05-2008, 03:11 PM   #31 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default Reply

Quote:
Originally Posted by shagpile View Post
What I don't understand is why you UKIP folk seem to be so entrenched in your view that the EU is bad, but UK is good
The armed forces of the UK would defend the Scottish part of the UK - do you think the EU military wing now under construction would do such a thing? I don't.
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 12-05-2008, 04:13 PM   #32 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,494
cassie is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Britannist View Post
I think you may find, SP, that the majority of Scottish people in Scotland did not vote for a Scottish Assembly in 1979. A slight majority of those who turned out to vote in the 1979 Scottish Assembly referendum backed the proposal to set an Assembly up but the rules of the referendum of 1979 were (I believe) that a majority of all those entitled to vote had to back the Assembly. Only a minority of all those entitled to vote backed the proposal to establish a Scottish Assembly in the 1979 referendum.

You mentioned the Conservative Party (in the quote above) - the 1979 Scottish Assembly referendum took place during the closing period of the 1974-9 Labour Government and the rules of the referendum were set by the Labour Government of 1974-9. The Conservative Party did not deny a Scotland an Assembly. The voters did not vote for one in sufficiently large numbers under the rules, and, consequently, a Scottish Assembly was never set up.
Actual figures per the Electoral Commission:

Yes: 51.6%
No: 48.4%
Turnout: 63.8%

The Electoral Commission : Referendums : Past UK referendums : Scotland - 1979


---------------------------------
cassie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 04:16 PM   #33 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default England, national referendum, Constitutional matter, UK

Quote:
Originally Posted by cassie View Post
Actual figures per the Electoral Commission: Yes: 51.6%. No: 48.4%
Turnout: 63.8%
Thank you for those useful figures, Cassie, regarding the 1979 Scottish Assembly referendum.

Maybe one day England will have her first ever national referendum (on a Constitutional matter). As we know, England is the only part of the UK never to have had a referendum of her own on any matter.
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 04:37 PM   #34 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,494
cassie is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shagpile View Post
What I don't understand is why you UKIP folk seem to be so entreched in your view that the EU is bad, but UK is good
It's not a case of the UK being good, but more that the EU is so much worse!

There is too much evidence that the core of individuals exercising power in the EU are hostile to Great Britain, and that includes Scotland. Not only that, they are either incompetent or very dictatorial or both! Take the matter of the earlier EU Constitution. Had this EU gang been honest and upright, they would have agreed a single date upon which all members states holding referenda on the issue (as distinct from their respective parliaments settling it as in the case of Germany, which was the scheme adopted the second time around) would have held them simultaneously. Then, no member state would have been influenced by the outcome of earlier referenda.

Instead, they plotted to hold them consecutively, with the Spanish going first. They anticipated that the Spanish would vote to adopt the Constitution and all other referenda would follow suit in a snowball effect. How devious, how wrong, how incompetent, but it exposed the manipulative contempt they have for ordinary citizens!

The rest is history! Not only did these devious schemers fail to achieve their goal, but they then contemptuously set aside the results, and have contrived to impose that Constitution on us under a different guise. This time they have not gone through the pretence of consulting EU voters directly, save for Ireland. One theory about Aherne stepping down is to avoid prejudicing the referendum there with which he is closely associated. No doubt the 5 million people there will be bought off in some way with a generous grant, just as the 1.7 million in Northern Ireland were bought off by the Blair Government with £53 billion to re-instate the NI Assembly!

Now, do you really think it is prudent to have a cabal like that in charge of your security and defence? They'd sacrifice huge numbers of us if they thought it would save their necks.


------------------------
cassie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 05:55 PM   #35 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, England
Posts: 1,053
Northumbrian is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Britannist View Post

If Scotland were to quit the Union of the UK then the Union of the UK would just carry on without her (as a Union of Wales, Northern Ireland and England). It would not "go" (your word from the quote above) if Scotland left the UK.
Sorry, but there is a little document produced in 1707 titled 'Act of Union'. If that's no longer valid then there's no Union.
Northumbrian is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 07:40 PM   #36 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,494
cassie is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northumbrian View Post
Sorry, but there is a little document produced in 1707 titled 'Act of Union'. If that's no longer valid then there's no Union.
In 1707, England & Wales united with Scotland. You also forgot the Act of 1801.

Legislation is subordinate to subsequent legislation where it applies.




-------------------------------
cassie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 08:04 PM   #37 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, England
Posts: 1,053
Northumbrian is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cassie View Post
In 1707, England & Wales united with Scotland. You also forgot the Act of 1801.

Legislation is subordinate to subsequent legislation where it applies.




-------------------------------
But the subsequent legislation is for Great Britain and Northern Ireland. England (and Wales) isn't Great Britain.

I seem to have had this conversation a few times. I'm sure they'd be plenty of lawyers who would agree with me. Should we ask some?
Northumbrian is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 11:09 PM   #38 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default England, Union, Wales, Act of Union, Ireland, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northumbrian View Post
Britannist wrote: If Scotland were to quit the Union of the UK then the Union of the UK would just carry on without her (as a Union of Wales, Northern Ireland and England). It would not "go" (your word from the quote above) if Scotland left the UK.

Northumbrian wrote: Sorry, but there is a little document produced in 1707 titled 'Act of Union'. If that's no longer valid then there's no Union.
I have to state that you are wrong, Northumbrian. I know that you do not like the UK and want it to go - but (thank goodness) the United Kingdom would still exist should Scotland quit it.

England was in Union with Wales before The Act of Union with Scotland of 1707. Consequently, the ancient Union of Wales and England would continue should The Act Of Union between Scotland and England/Wales be ended. The Act Of Union 1707 does not cover the Union of England and Wales which already existed at the time of The Act Of Union of England/Wales with Scotland. The 1707 Act refers to England/Wales in Union with Scotland.

So, if Scotland quit the UK and The Act Of Union of 1707 were dissolved it leaves the following:

England and Wales in Union with each other.

Northern Ireland in Union with a Great Britain which would not include Scotland but which would include Wales and England.

In other words, a Union of England, Wales and Northern Ireland - the United Kingdom without Scotland.

And before you try to tell us that The Act of Union of Ireland with Great Britain would cease to exist if Scotland quit the UK: The Act of Union of Ireland with Great Britain survived the departure from the UK of the land area which now calls itself the Irish Republic and it (what is now The Act of Union of Northern Ireland with Great Britain) would survive the departure of Scotland from the UK.
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 11:16 PM   #39 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default Great Britain, Scotland, Union, England/Wales, Northern Ireland, UK, Ireland, GB

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northumbrian View Post
England (and Wales) isn't Great Britain.
Yes it is.

Great Britain does not cease to exist if Scotland ended Union with England/Wales and Northern Ireland.

Northern Ireland is not the whole of Ireland - but The Act Of Union of Ireland and Great Britain (GB) still exists even thought about 70% of Ireland is no longer in the UK.

Likewise, if Scotland (about 40% of the land area of Great Britain) quit the UK, Northern Ireland - through the 1801 Act of Union of Ireland with Great Britain - would remain in Union with the remaining 60% of Great Britain (England and Wales).
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 11:25 PM   #40 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default UK, Scotland, England, Wales, Union, 1707, 1801, Great Britain, Ireland, continue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northumbrian View Post
I seem to have had this conversation a few times.
Yes - and you want the UK to end and do not like the fact that it would continue (as it should do) in the event of Scotland quitting it.

The Union of the UK would carry on if Scotland quit it - because England and Wales were in Union with each other before they formed a Union with Scotland in 1707 and because Northern Ireland (through The 1801 Act of Union of Great Britain and Ireland) has remained a part of the UK after the departure of 70% of Ireland from the UK and would remain a part of the Union of the UK in the event of 40% of Great Britain (Scotland) quitting the UK.

Apart from the two Acts of Union - the fact is that if England, Wales and Northern Ireland want Union - which they do - they will have it. Even if that meant implementing a new Act of Union in the event of Scotland pulling out of the UK.

I might just add that I want Scotland to remain a part of the UK: a Union of the UK in which England has an English Parliament to match the powers of the one in Scotland.

Last edited by Britannist; 12-05-2008 at 11:30 PM.
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0