Englander 1

LONDON RESULTS
Sunday, 04 May 2008
London was the first time of standing for the English Democrats.
London Mayoral Results 10,695 votes 1st preference, 73,538 votes second preference.

So, 84,233 voted for the English Democrats in the Mayoral Campaign, we gained a

higher second vote than the left list and the Independent Candidate, we were 6,602

behind the Christian Alliance. UKIP & BNP did better than the EDP, but both parties had

stood in the two previous Mayoral elections and both had built up a degree of support.

For a first appearance we can be pleased that this was a creditable

result and a firm foundation which can be built on. A sincere thanks to

all those English patriots who understand what the English Democrats

represent and what we are fighting for on your behalf. We are winning

the argument and we are very close to beging winning the elections,

no easy task in a two party system. THANK YOU ALL!


The English Democrats Party Putting England First - LONDON RESULTS

__________________
"There is a forgotten, nay almost forbidden word, which means more to me than any other.
That word is ENGLAND." - Sir Winston Churchill

http://englander1.blogspot.com/

blueblood1920

Second prefrence votes are pointless, you didnt do much better on the list or in the constituencies where you was beat by the NF in every head to head. The results are terrible for the EDP, who were hoping for 1 seat in the GLA.

zbrahead

Erm, it is due to the laws of statistics that you get voted for, as in a large city, with a population over 2 million, the percentage of nutters means that alot of people are nutters in London, but they are but a small percentage.

Northumbrian

You're a card. So unless someone votes for a party that meets with your approval, you must be a 'nutter'?

zbrahead

How polite.

In laymans terms: the ED party are a major minority, and due to the laws of statistics, very few people actually vote for them, becaus e they are a minority for a reason. The only things capable of changing minority are heavily unstable political climes.

Northumbrian

So I take it you're happy with the status quo of 2.5 major parties?

zbrahead

Yep. They are the two main parties because they are stable governments with stable policies.

Northumbrian

Stable policies? I do enjoy the stable policies of being taxed to death, more and more government instrusion of my privacy, soft on crime, the loss of manufacturing industries, mass immigration, denial of democracy to England, participating in illegal wars, handing over our powers to the EU etc.

Thanks for that.

They are the two main parties because they have the funds, the media contacts and a FPTP system where the public are conditioned into thinking only two parties can win, so will vote against the one they don't want, thus perpetuating the cycle.

Well that's me done. I'm sure they are plenty of others who can give you more info.

rjt

I think that is game set and match to you sir, an accurate representation of our current political system.

__________________
Mr Delors said that he wanted the European Parliament to be the democratic body of the community, The Commission to be The Executive and The Council Of Ministers The Senate. NO! NO! NO!
(Margaret Thatcher 30 Oct 1990)

Ignore List: The Prophets of ST Al the Unelectable.

zbrahead

They are *relatively* a damn sight more stable than any other alternatives!