British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > English Democrats


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 31-03-2008, 11:14 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
FredSucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,941
FredSucks is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Dear Moe

You are quite right

Messers Constantine, Atkins and Thompson, are incapable of building their own party, as they were incapable of building the English Democrats in their own respective areas, even though they were given a free reign to do what ever they wished to do.

It's sad to see them behave in the way they do as alleged English Nationalists.

Unfortunately as the English Democrats is a growing party, occassionally these types of egotistical lunatics will arise, they have to be left to follow their own folly.

I will be most interested to analyse their results in May 2008.
FredSucks is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 31-03-2008, 11:16 PM   #12 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,225
Independent UKIP has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kentishman View Post
Richard you are a complete Knob

The online poll was an MSN one Matt O'Connor is currently at 16% in this.

I gave the link

================================================== ========

Matt had not featured at all in 1st Preference Voting

He is now on the radar at 1% equal to the BNP and above UKIP

This poll was dated 25 March 2008.

Since then Matt has had a mention on BBC Radio London and BBC 1 (London)
I don't agree that Richard is a >snipped<of any kind. If he starts denouncing UKIP in an outrageous manner (as opposed to a reasoned manner) I might reconsider but at present I have no reason to agree with you Kentishman [Not that I call anyone here a >snipped<].

I would vote Batten if I was able to vote at the MSN poll. I cannot do so. You must know it is a manipulated poll with no credibility. It makes sense to mention it but highlighting it and continuing to pretend it has credence just serves to undermine the credibility of the EDs.

The results of the Yougov poll may have some credence for Ken, Boris and Paddick; it has no credence when we are at the 0-3% level except to confirm that none of them have any prospect of being the next mayor of London. The poll suggests if I understand it correctly that O'Connor has the greatest level of support for others (after the Greens) of Lib Dem supporters, no support from Labour supporters and 1% from tory supporters. Why is O'Connor so attractive to Lib Dem supporters? I personally doubt he is, is it just that maybe 1 or 2 indviduals have made that selection, possibly bored, possibly thinking Liberal Democrats are similar to English Democrats in policy as in name?

I await the final results.

Last edited by Aardvark; 01-04-2008 at 08:53 AM.
Independent UKIP is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 31-03-2008, 11:22 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
FredSucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,941
FredSucks is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

The 1% for Matt O'Connor (English Democrat) gave a Party ID as "Conservative", this supports the findings of Iain Dale.

I don't on why you can't vote in the MSN London Mayoral Poll, it really is very simple.

Trust me on Richard Atkins he is a>snipped<.

Last edited by Aardvark; 01-04-2008 at 08:54 AM. Reason: Offensive language
FredSucks is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 31-03-2008, 11:39 PM   #14 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,225
Independent UKIP has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kentishman View Post
Dear Moe

You are quite right

Messers Constantine, Atkins and Thompson, are incapable of building their own party, as they were incapable of building the English Democrats in their own respective areas, even though they were given a free reign to do what ever they wished to do.

It's sad to see them behave in the way they do as alleged English Nationalists.

Unfortunately as the English Democrats is a growing party, occassionally these types of egotistical lunatics will arise, they have to be left to follow their own folly.

I will be most interested to analyse their results in May 2008.
That is a most interesting post from you Kentishman. If they are indeed egotistical lunatics as you assert then your party failed dismally in identifying that prior to their gaining positions of influence. That is yet another reason not to vote ED based on your very own statements. Who has been disciplined for that failure?

I doubt any of them are egotistical lunatics but you are quite correct in your interest in their results in the May elections. I will also be interested in analysing their results compared to parties such as UKIP and ED.
Independent UKIP is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 12:03 AM   #15 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,225
Independent UKIP has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kentishman View Post
The 1% for Matt O'Connor (English Democrat) gave a Party ID as "Conservative", this supports the findings of Iain Dale.

I don't on why you can't vote in the MSN London Mayoral Poll, it really is very simple.

Trust me on Richard Atkins he is a >snipped<.
Correct, but is that one indvidual or two individuals? It has no credibility either way.

I'm not registered at MSN, is that the problem? Do you think that poll is an accurate reflection of voter intention?

I don't know Richard Atkins. I take it that you are naming 'Richard the Lionheart' as someone called Richard Atkins. That is a very sad breach of forum protocol on your part Kentishman. Just because we all know who you are doesn't mean that all others who perfectly reasonably use pseudonyms here should be exposed as a matter of course by yourself. I don't trust you that Richard Atkins is a >snipped<Time will have to tell about that.

Last edited by Aardvark; 01-04-2008 at 08:54 AM.
Independent UKIP is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 12:15 AM   #16 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,482
cassie is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Independent UKIP View Post
That is a most interesting post from you Kentishman. If they are indeed egotistical lunatics as you assert then your party failed dismally in identifying that prior to their gaining positions of influence.That is yet another reason not to vote ED based on your very own statements. Who has been disciplined for that failure?

I doubt any of them are egotistical lunatics but you are quite correct in your interest in their results in the May elections. I will also be interested in analysing their results compared to parties such as UKIP and ED.
Sound reasoning here Independent UKIP!

It is usually unwise to describe erstwhile allies in extreme terms lest it rebounds, as you've demonstrated very logically here. If one can't show respect other compatriots and their opinions, one can hardly expect them to show respect in return.



___________________
cassie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 12:48 AM   #17 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,225
Independent UKIP has some supporters
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by cassie View Post
Sound reasoning here Independent UKIP!

It is usually unwise to describe erstwhile allies in extreme terms lest it rebounds, as you've demonstrated very logically here. If one can't show respect other compatriots and their opinions, one can hardly expect them to show respect in return.



___________________
Rare praise indeed.
Independent UKIP is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 08:57 AM   #18 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oxonia
Posts: 3,546
Aardvark has some supporters
Default

I have asked you guys to calm down. Kentishman is banned for one week for persistently using the word I have snipped from various posts. This follows a previous warning.

This doesn't mean that people can gloat; the pointless use of rude words to describe people when argument runs out is not a substitute for proper debate.

You all have a lot to offer, but would rather sit here in a slagfest than fight your respective campaigns.
__________________
When in Woking do as the Wokes do.

"I do not wish to form my opinions by thoughtlessly quoting others; I wish others to support their opinions by sensibly quoting me." Paul Wesson (Aardvark) 13th April 2008
Aardvark is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 11:55 AM   #19 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Frith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 660
Frith is just starting out
Default

For the record, I have spoken by correspondence to both Andrew and King Richard and never gained any impression that either of them is not sincere, dedicated and prepared for a struggle that is worth the effort. That is why I will support the Free England Party in whichever way I can, and its growing membership. A party like this associated with a movement for the restoration of all aspects of English culture is worthy and as such will in any case act as a strong opposing voice to any policies from the big three that threaten nation status, folk-right, or the religious choice of native peoples.
Frith is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 03:26 PM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Richard the Lionheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 586
Party: Free England Party
Richard the Lionheart is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frith View Post
For the record, I have spoken by correspondence to both Andrew and King Richard and never gained any impression that either of them is not sincere, dedicated and prepared for a struggle that is worth the effort. That is why I will support the Free England Party in whichever way I can, and its growing membership. A party like this associated with a movement for the restoration of all aspects of English culture is worthy and as such will in any case act as a strong opposing voice to any policies from the big three that threaten nation status, folk-right, or the religious choice of native peoples.
Thank you for your kind words Frith, it's people like you that encourage and inspire us in the cause.
__________________
The Free England Party - England's Premier Nationalist Party
www.freeengland.com
.....Serious about England
Richard the Lionheart is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0