![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,941
![]() |
Dear Moe
You are quite right Messers Constantine, Atkins and Thompson, are incapable of building their own party, as they were incapable of building the English Democrats in their own respective areas, even though they were given a free reign to do what ever they wished to do. It's sad to see them behave in the way they do as alleged English Nationalists. Unfortunately as the English Democrats is a growing party, occassionally these types of egotistical lunatics will arise, they have to be left to follow their own folly. I will be most interested to analyse their results in May 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,225
![]() |
Quote:
I would vote Batten if I was able to vote at the MSN poll. I cannot do so. You must know it is a manipulated poll with no credibility. It makes sense to mention it but highlighting it and continuing to pretend it has credence just serves to undermine the credibility of the EDs. The results of the Yougov poll may have some credence for Ken, Boris and Paddick; it has no credence when we are at the 0-3% level except to confirm that none of them have any prospect of being the next mayor of London. The poll suggests if I understand it correctly that O'Connor has the greatest level of support for others (after the Greens) of Lib Dem supporters, no support from Labour supporters and 1% from tory supporters. Why is O'Connor so attractive to Lib Dem supporters? I personally doubt he is, is it just that maybe 1 or 2 indviduals have made that selection, possibly bored, possibly thinking Liberal Democrats are similar to English Democrats in policy as in name? I await the final results. Last edited by Aardvark; 01-04-2008 at 08:53 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,941
![]() |
The 1% for Matt O'Connor (English Democrat) gave a Party ID as "Conservative", this supports the findings of Iain Dale.
I don't on why you can't vote in the MSN London Mayoral Poll, it really is very simple. Trust me on Richard Atkins he is a>snipped<. Last edited by Aardvark; 01-04-2008 at 08:54 AM. Reason: Offensive language |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,225
![]() |
Quote:
I doubt any of them are egotistical lunatics but you are quite correct in your interest in their results in the May elections. I will also be interested in analysing their results compared to parties such as UKIP and ED. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,225
![]() |
Quote:
I'm not registered at MSN, is that the problem? Do you think that poll is an accurate reflection of voter intention? I don't know Richard Atkins. I take it that you are naming 'Richard the Lionheart' as someone called Richard Atkins. That is a very sad breach of forum protocol on your part Kentishman. Just because we all know who you are doesn't mean that all others who perfectly reasonably use pseudonyms here should be exposed as a matter of course by yourself. I don't trust you that Richard Atkins is a >snipped<Time will have to tell about that. Last edited by Aardvark; 01-04-2008 at 08:54 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,482
![]() |
Quote:
![]() It is usually unwise to describe erstwhile allies in extreme terms lest it rebounds, as you've demonstrated very logically here. If one can't show respect other compatriots and their opinions, one can hardly expect them to show respect in return. ___________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,225
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oxonia
Posts: 3,546
![]() |
I have asked you guys to calm down. Kentishman is banned for one week for persistently using the word I have snipped from various posts. This follows a previous warning.
This doesn't mean that people can gloat; the pointless use of rude words to describe people when argument runs out is not a substitute for proper debate. You all have a lot to offer, but would rather sit here in a slagfest than fight your respective campaigns.
__________________
When in Woking do as the Wokes do. "I do not wish to form my opinions by thoughtlessly quoting others; I wish others to support their opinions by sensibly quoting me." Paul Wesson (Aardvark) 13th April 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 660
![]() |
For the record, I have spoken by correspondence to both Andrew and King Richard and never gained any impression that either of them is not sincere, dedicated and prepared for a struggle that is worth the effort. That is why I will support the Free England Party in whichever way I can, and its growing membership. A party like this associated with a movement for the restoration of all aspects of English culture is worthy and as such will in any case act as a strong opposing voice to any policies from the big three that threaten nation status, folk-right, or the religious choice of native peoples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 586
Party: Free England Party
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
The Free England Party - England's Premier Nationalist Party www.freeengland.com .....Serious about England |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]