British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > English Democrats


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-02-2008, 12:58 AM   #11 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,741
Party: Conservatives
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

The EDs may have trounced uKIP but their share of the vote is nothing to crow about.

I suspect their 'take' on the fire station closure may have been better than UKIP's
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 09-02-2008, 11:29 AM   #12 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,852
cassie is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Heavens this is so petty! Those candidates with double digit shares of the turnout must chortle like mad over what they will see as the niggling of those with single digit support!

Given that most of us (if not all) are vehemently anti-EU, the pity is that neither anti-EU candidate got 10% or more of the vote! The difference between the EDP candidate and UKIP's is 1.9%. The difference between the EDP candidate and Labour's (who came third) is 7.0%! Doesn't this set things in perspective?

Regardless of actual position, when EDP and UKIP candidates start getting upwards of 20% between them, the other parties will become very nervous! Now, what's to worry about with a total anti-EU vote of 5.3%?

Surely there are better targets for our spleen!


______________________________
cassie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2008, 12:59 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
blueblood1920's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 1,229
Party: BNP
blueblood1920 is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cassie View Post
Heavens this is so petty! Those candidates with double digit shares of the turnout must chortle like mad over what they will see as the niggling of those with single digit support!

Given that most of us (if not all) are vehemently anti-EU, the pity is that neither anti-EU candidate got 10% or more of the vote! The difference between the EDP candidate and UKIP's is 1.9%. The difference between the EDP candidate and Labour's (who came third) is 7.0%! Doesn't this set things in perspective?

Regardless of actual position, when EDP and UKIP candidates start getting upwards of 20% between them, the other parties will become very nervous! Now, what's to worry about with a total anti-EU vote of 5.3%?

Surely there are better targets for our spleen!


______________________________
Very well said, would of been interesting to see how the BNP would of fared here. May of seen even lower results for UKIP and EDP.
blueblood1920 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2008, 01:10 PM   #14 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,852
cassie is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueblood1920 View Post
Very well said, would of been interesting to see how the BNP would of fared here. May of seen even lower results for UKIP and EDP.
Thank you!

I say full marks to both the EDP and UKIP candidates for sticking their heads above the parapet and giving voters a choice.

Yes, the impact of the BNP there would have been interesting!


___________________________
cassie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2008, 01:41 PM   #15 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,741
Party: Conservatives
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueblood1920 View Post
Very well said, would of been interesting to see how the BNP would of fared here. May of seen even lower results for UKIP and EDP.

...would have fared here

May have seen even lower results...
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2008, 06:34 PM   #16 (permalink)
rjt
Uber Member
 
rjt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aldershot
Posts: 5,384
rjt is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cassie View Post
Thank you!

I say full marks to both the EDP and UKIP candidates for sticking their heads above the parapet and giving voters a choice.

Yes, the impact of the BNP there would have been interesting!


___________________________
Yes I agree with the first bit, you have got to be in it to win it.

As for the BNP I would have noted there performance with intrest, they are entitled to there views but frankly how nayone can vote for that sort of filth is beyond me.
__________________
Mr Delors said that he wanted the European Parliament to be the democratic body of the community, The Commission to be The Executive and The Council Of Ministers The Senate. NO! NO! NO!
(Margaret Thatcher 30 Oct 1990)

Ignore List: The Prophets of ST Al the Unelectable.
rjt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2008, 08:24 PM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Richard the Lionheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 607
Party: Free England Party
Richard the Lionheart is just starting out
Default

I know some of the EDP Portsmouth lads and they're a good hardworking bunch. I'd be interested to see what their leaflet was like. I would guess no matter what was put out, it just wasnt going to be their night. It seems the LD candidate was holding all the aces with regard to the local issue.
Richard the Lionheart is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2008, 08:34 AM   #18 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,741
Party: Conservatives
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

According to the TV local news, the by-election was won by 'The Copnor Road Fire Station'.

I did hear that the winner couldn't make the count. Now we know the reason.

Obviously the strong, silent type. Can't see it making many appearances in the council chamber, either.
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2008, 10:03 AM   #19 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oxonia
Posts: 3,928
Aardvark has some supporters
Default

The thing is that picking up on a local campaign issue will help win votes. Not understanding it will lose them.

A few years ago I was re-elected to my Town Council above 2 Tories and a known Labour supporter because I campaigned to keep a footpath open (lost the seat last year after 8 years).

In 2006 I got 40% of the vote as an Independent (only 2 candidates so I lost). I lived in the district council ward and knew one of the key issues inside out. It got me an extra 50-100 votes in all probability. The Tory leadership rather cynically dealt with the problem (a blocked drainage ditch full of shopping trolleys and rats) just before the election. Last year my vote was pushed below 20% by similar cynical tactics.

Carping or crowing about local election results is usually pointless. Most seats can change hand on local issues, but don't. Small parties can be elected against national swings if the individual is popular locally. Locally an Independent took a District seat from the Tories by only 7 votes having campaigned to block a town centre Asda. The Greens took their first seat on Witney Town Council by sheer hard work and having a well known campaigning candidate not because there was a swing to the Greens.

Chances are the EDs could have won the seat if they had got to the LibDem candidate first. A lot of people at local level are induced to be candidates by promises of support or, oddly, promises that they will be a paper candidate and won't get elected. The BNP must be regretting the calibre of some of their councillors in Dagenham; they clearly didn't expect to win. Sometimes elected members don't even know their party's policies and are interested only in parochial issues.
__________________
When in Woking do as the Wokes do.

"I do not wish to form my opinions by thoughtlessly quoting others; I wish others to support their opinions by sensibly quoting me." Paul Wesson (Aardvark) 13th April 2008
Aardvark is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2008, 06:57 PM   #20 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,741
Party: Conservatives
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

And after all that fuss...the County Council have decided to close the Fire Station.

Apparently 2 Portsmouth councillors turned traitor and voted to close. At least we can be sure they weren't UKIP
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0