Richard I see there are quite a few quotes as movement and organsition being used.Is that the title along with the name.????
Last edited by reg; 22-01-2008 at 10:32 PM. Reason: correction
My hope is that the R&B duo Nancy G and the catamite can be dispatched to live quietly together and the BNP can be run properly and thus steered to real not imagined success.
True - the more UKIP talk about immigration (i.e. opposing it) the more votes the party will get. It is as simple as that.
And saying things against the global warming lobby (as some in UKIP have admirably been doing of late) will also do the party no harm at all in the ballot box. I think some people are starting to get very bored indeed about hearing stuff about (alleged) 'climate change') every day on the media. We all know that some politicians are trying to highlight this issue so they have an excuse to dig into our pockets more.
England needs a national party that is devoid of neo nazis, British Israelites, liberal extremists, and egotists. The reason why there are so many English parties is possibly because each of these groups has a party of its own, and an Emperor to go with it. England needs a party of her own. For the English people, all of them, not just a particular political flavour or religion. It has the worst of the immigration and is the most reviled by the new left. She's in trouble, she is our Mother Country and she needs us. If anyone can come up with a half decent English party that has the formula for success I'll join it from here. I've experienced the alternatives and they are too angry within ever to grow or too specifically focused on non-English aspects to attract anything but circles of supporters not of England but of some non-mainstream ideology. They have been brave attempts, as are all new parties in every sphere that have moved out to make a stand. It's just that their stand hasn't stood.
The English need a party that is unwaveringly for England and the English before any external ideology can interfere with this cause.
Please let us know when you have set it up.
I've been trying for ages through the pages of this forum to get the English Democrats to form a co-operation agreement with UKIP to avoid vote-splitting in elections such as the ones coming up in London in a few months' time - but neither said have talked to each other about this much (if at all).
Which means the vote could be split much to the pleasure of the vile europhiles.
I'm not convinced a party can be both pro-UK and pro-England. We believe in the supremacy of an English parliament, not the halfway house called devolution. Our view is that England should have a government of the people, for the people, by the people. A cliche yes, but a sincere belief. We reject the concept of politicans from elsewhere in the UK dictating terms to the people of England. We reject the idea of a Scottish Prime Minister and a Scottish Chancellor despatching English troops off to foreign lands to fight their wars of conquest. We reject the idea of a Scottish Prime Minister flooding England with unlimited immigration. We reject the idea of a Scottish Chancellor robbing pension funds of around £80 billion from the people of England. A devolved government of England would not be able to solve any of these problems, and that is why we think England should have control of her own affairs. Whichever way you cut it, the UK is doing a bad job of running England.
It's doing a bad job of running Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales too and the rival Parliament in Edinburgh and the devolved body are just making matters even worse.
England should have both her own national legislature (giving her equality with Scotland within the UK) whilst also be the largest part of the UK national Parliament (as she is now).
Bookmarks