British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > English Democrats


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-01-2008, 10:42 PM   #11 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Smidgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 2,195
Party: Libertarian Party
Smidgey is just starting out
Send a message via MSN to Smidgey
Default

I could only get 7.
__________________
How vain is man, who boasts in fight the valour of gigantic might!

-Georg Friedrich Händel
Smidgey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 11-01-2008, 05:23 AM   #12 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default Answers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurosceptic Atlanticist View Post
The quiz clearly makes the distinction between ceremonial and historic counties.
Yes - but it still wouldn't accept my answers: which were correct answers .
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2008, 05:26 AM   #13 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default Yorkshire, south of England, holidays, west, Sussex

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurosceptic Atlanticist View Post
I don't know, it's mostly things like having North, West and South Yorkshire instead of just 'Yorkshire'.
It should just be one big Yorkshire.

No one in the south of England who is about to travel to that county says "I'm off on my holidays to west Yorkshire." They will, quite rightly, say that they are going to Yorkshire.

The same applies for Sussex - there is one big Sussex (not two called 'East' and 'West' Sussex).
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2008, 05:30 AM   #14 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default England's counties, Yorkshire, Sussex, Wales, Glamorgan, Powys, map, centuries, Heath

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smidgey View Post
I could only get 7.
That's probably because you know the proper names of England's counties and not all these new names like 'west' Yorkshire and 'east' Sussex.

You will know only Yorkshire and Sussex.

Like me, you probably do not recognise the City of Bristol as a county (as the quiz claims it is).

Other parts of the UK have suffered too with these artificial names - such as Wales where Glamorgan has been split into three and where the new name of Powys has appeared replacing the names of ancient counties which had been on the map of Wales for many centuries.

Heath, the europhile 'Conservative' Prime Minister, is to blame for all of this.
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2008, 11:04 AM   #15 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North East England
Posts: 6,785
Party: Free England Party
Hartlepool has some supporters
Default

Yes,Heath did it and his Conservatives are still intent of carrying out his plans against thie country and its people,regardless of what they say.

We have stopped saying the above recently,we need to start doing it againbut more often and much louder.

THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY ARE GENERALLY PRO-EUROPEAN UNION.
Hartlepool is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2008, 12:51 PM   #16 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,852
cassie is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hartlepool View Post
Yes,Heath did it and his Conservatives are still intent of carrying out his plans against thie country and its people,regardless of what they say.

We have stopped saying the above recently,we need to start doing it againbut more often and much louder.

THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY ARE GENERALLY PRO-EUROPEAN UNION.
Yes, the changes were got through by assurances that they were for administrative purposes only.

One of the problems has been Royal mail's rapid adoption of the new admin areas for use in its postal code system. Who now includes the relevant county (traditional, ceremonial or otherwise) in correspondence going from one 'admin' area to another? If everyone in London and Middlesex and Surrey started to include the relevant county, especially when communicating with others outwith the south east of England, it might help.

Even the EDP (yes, you know who) doesn't seem to know what the counties were pre- 1972: English Democrats Party:: News blog

No Cumberland, Westmorland, or Huntingdonshire [home of Ollie Cromwell] mentioned!



_________________________________
cassie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2008, 09:26 PM   #17 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default Christmas, Rutland, county, Heath, Leicestershire, Derbyshire, Stockport, postcodes

Quote:
Originally Posted by cassie View Post
One of the problems has been Royal mail's rapid adoption of the new admin areas for use in its postal code system. Who now includes the relevant county (traditional, ceremonial or otherwise) in correspondence going from one 'admin' area to another? If everyone in London and Middlesex and Surrey started to include the relevant county, especially when communicating with others outwith the south east of England, it might help.
I always include the name of the county (of the person I am writing to) on inland correspondence I post (including when I write to Middlesex). I refuse to use the names of artificially-created counties such as 'Humberside' or 'Avon'. The County Councils in those areas have gone, but I understand that the post office still thinks that those unwanted names exist.

I note that just before last Christmas the post office agreed to start using 'Rutland' in addresses again now that the county of Rutland (which the europhile Heath put in Leicestershire in 1974) has been re-established.

The postcode system in this country should be based on the county people reside in. For instance, people often live in a postcode area which is actually based/centred on the neighbouring county (one example being north-west Derbyshire being under the Stockport, Lancashire 'SK' postcode network).

It would be much simpler if we have postcodes which did not cross county boundaries.

I would like to see a very straightforward postcode system in which places like Derby would become 'Derbyshire 1' or 'Derbyshire 2' and where Hastings would be 'Sussex 3' and 'Sussex 4'. There may have to be additional prefixes to those for the precise area of the postcode district (i.e. Sussex 1 - 148) but the main point is that postcodes would be based on counties and that postcode numbering networks would not cross county boundaries.

Such a system would be easier for the post office; easier for the public and it would strengthen our county identity.

Last edited by Britannist; 11-01-2008 at 09:34 PM.
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2008, 10:12 PM   #18 (permalink)
Member
 
jgrabham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 294
jgrabham is just starting out
Default

"Yorkshire" isn't one, but neithers "City of York" or "east riding" I nearly got the whole of the north...

XD
__________________
Look, the people you are after are the people you depend on. We cook your meals, we haul your trash, we connect your calls, we drive your ambulances. We guard you while you sleep. Do not... f**k with us.

Proudly increasing my CO2 output since 2007


"I'd have no desire to penalize a man because he's worthonly fifteen dollars a week. But I'll be damned if I can see why a man worth
forty must be penalized - and penalized in favor of the one who's less
competent."
- Ayn Rand
jgrabham is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2008, 10:20 PM   #19 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Westcountryman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Westcountry.
Posts: 5,922
Party: None
Westcountryman is just starting out
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgrabham View Post
"Yorkshire" isn't one, but neithers "City of York" or "east riding" I nearly got the whole of the north...

XD
City of York isn't there, but the East Riding is 'East Riding of Yorkshire'. Did you get Tyne and Wear?
__________________
Manus haec inimica tyrannis ense petit placidam sub libertate quietam - "This hand of mine, which is hostile to tyrants, seeks by the sword quiet peace under liberty."
Westcountryman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2008, 11:38 PM   #20 (permalink)
Member
 
jgrabham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 294
jgrabham is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurosceptic Atlanticist View Post
Did you get Tyne and Wear?
Naturally

(I live in Durham though, so Its probabally Cheating, since I generally stay within County Durham and Tyne and Wear all the time. )
__________________
Look, the people you are after are the people you depend on. We cook your meals, we haul your trash, we connect your calls, we drive your ambulances. We guard you while you sleep. Do not... f**k with us.

Proudly increasing my CO2 output since 2007


"I'd have no desire to penalize a man because he's worthonly fifteen dollars a week. But I'll be damned if I can see why a man worth
forty must be penalized - and penalized in favor of the one who's less
competent."
- Ayn Rand
jgrabham is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0