British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > English Democrats


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28-10-2007, 01:30 AM   #1 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default "Conservatives will hand crucial powers to English constituency MPs"

Tories will hand crucial powers to English MPs | Politics | The Observer
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 28-10-2007, 04:10 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 949
Party: English Democrats
Little Englander (sour) is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I just cannot see how anyone can disagree with barring Scots elected MPs from voting on English issues. It would seem to be ok to bar English elected MPs from voting on Scottish issues and unionists deem this to be democratic
equality.
It doesn't go far enough, if Scotland can have a Parliament then England can have a Parliament.
Unionist arch enemy, Alex Salmond. also thinks that it is time for England to have an independent Patliament.
Little Englander (sour) is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2007, 04:14 PM   #3 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Smidgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 2,195
Party: Libertarian Party
Smidgey is just starting out
Send a message via MSN to Smidgey
Default

It would seem that even the majority of Scot's agree with this. The only Scot I have ever met that disagrees is my own father. Him and I disagree on many things though, in my eye he is just a socialist, in his eye I am a right wing wacko.
__________________
How vain is man, who boasts in fight the valour of gigantic might!

-Georg Friedrich Händel
Smidgey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2007, 05:50 PM   #4 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Westcountryman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Westcountry.
Posts: 5,922
Party: None
Westcountryman is just starting out
Default

Why does he disagree with it? Enjoy telling English people what to do does he?

This would go some way to solving the West Lothian question. I don't care if it creates 'two tiers' of MP and thus makes Gordon the moron a second-rate MP and PM. Labour created this mess and the inequality by bringing about devolution in the first place.
__________________
Manus haec inimica tyrannis ense petit placidam sub libertate quietam - "This hand of mine, which is hostile to tyrants, seeks by the sword quiet peace under liberty."
Westcountryman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2007, 07:43 PM   #5 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,852
cassie is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smidgey View Post
It would seem that even the majority of Scot's agree with this. The only Scot I have ever met that disagrees is my own father. Him and I disagree on many things though, in my eye he is just a socialist, in his eye I am a right wing wacko.

The pretendy socialist Labour Party is going the right way [the right way??!! geddit!] to political extinction in England for decades!

Funny how it's ok to be nationalistic if you're a so called Scottish socialist, but not if you're an English socialist! Of course the Soviets were not the remotest nationalistic or chauvenistic on any level, but then, they were only communists!
cassie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2007, 09:05 PM   #6 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default Labour, English-only voting, Commons, English matters, Scottish, devolution, MPs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ModernUKIP View Post
This would go some way to solving the West Lothian question. I don't care if it creates 'two tiers' of MP.
Labour make the claim that English-only voting in the Commons on English matters would create two-tiers of MPs. What they really mean, of course, is that they find it difficult to win a (Labour) majority of seats in England.

In fact (and it is a point not made often enough) - it is Labour who created two-tiers of MPs in the House of Commons with their botched devolution in 1999. From that time, two groups of MPs existed:

1. Those Scottish constituency MPs who can vote on specifically English matters before the House of Commons but who cannot vote on Scottish domestic matters (including those which affect their own constituents).

2. English constituency MPs who cannot vote on specifically Scottish matters (because, of course, those matters are now dealt with by the rival Parliament in Edinburgh) and who cannot vote on English internal matters (because, as far as the House of Commons goes, there is no such thing - all votes in the House of Commons are taken on a British pan-UK basis).
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2007, 09:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default UKIP criticises Conservative English-only voting plan for Commons

UKIP criticises the Conservative proposal for a Grand Committee of English constituency MPs to deliberate on specifically English matters before the House of Commons:

UK Independence Party - Tory parliamentary plans 'dangerous'
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2007, 09:35 PM   #8 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default UKIP criticises Conservative plan for English-only voting in the House of Commons

There's more on this at:

UKIP: Tory parliamentary plans 'dangerous'
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2007, 01:12 PM   #9 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
arden forester's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Solihull, in The Forest of Arden, Warwickshire!
Posts: 2,662
Party: None
arden forester is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Englander (sour) View Post
I just cannot see how anyone can disagree with barring Scots elected MPs from voting on English issues. It would seem to be ok to bar English elected MPs from voting on Scottish issues and unionists deem this to be democratic
equality.
It doesn't go far enough, if Scotland can have a Parliament then England can have a Parliament.
Unionist arch enemy, Alex Salmond. also thinks that it is time for England to have an independent Patliament.
First bit, NO. An English Grand committee would still mean two class MPs. Second bit, YES. An English Parliament would be the only fair settlement.

Whilst I have been a Unionist and still am, I am no longer in favour of a "British" parliament supposedly carrying on the ways of Empire. I now would like to see a Union parliament in Westminster of only 300 MPs and an English parliament of around 200 MPs. Wales and Northern Ireland to have comparable parliaments and not assemblies.

This way the devolved parliaments are anchored into a UK. The fact that England is bigger is neither here nor there. In the USA there are four pacific states. California, Oregan, Washington and Alaska. Size does not bother them! But they all have something in common.

If Scotland votes for independence, I can't stop that, but I somehow think Salmond is getting a tad too excited! Also, the UKIP stance of abolishing the assemblies and going back ten years is a no-go. Once a political genie gets out of the bottle it's either a case of working with the situation or coming up with something new. Repeating the past never works.
arden forester is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2007, 01:23 PM   #10 (permalink)
rjt
Uber Member
 
rjt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aldershot
Posts: 5,384
rjt is just starting out
Default

I think the new Labour argument regarding two tiers of MPS is riddiculous, they have created that through devolution! What we are seeking now is parity for the English Tier.
__________________
Mr Delors said that he wanted the European Parliament to be the democratic body of the community, The Commission to be The Executive and The Council Of Ministers The Senate. NO! NO! NO!
(Margaret Thatcher 30 Oct 1990)

Ignore List: The Prophets of ST Al the Unelectable.
rjt is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0