Paedophile still active within EDL Leadership
Paedophile still active within EDL Leadership
Friday 6th January, 2012 - 17:02
EDL Paedophile and founding member, Richard Price
An English Defence League convicted paedophile is still active within the senior ranks of the EDL according to screenshots that have been released.
The organisation's original Facebook group with 15,000 members was hacked recently by ZHC Hacking company and a screenshot of the admin list was released. One of the admins was Paul Lancashire and the other was Richard Price. Price was one of the founding members of the organisation.
Price was outed by the Sunday Times earlier last year after being convicted of possessing indecent photographs of children and the EDL's leadership tried to cover it up. The organisation originally tried to claim he was not part of the EDL but soon backtracked when a previous statement by Tommy Robinson was found contradicting this. He was also convicted of possession of cocaine and crack cocaine. Price was banned from owning a computer for a year, given a three-year community supervision order and placed on the sex offenders register for five years.
Price recently contacted EDL News to claim he was innocent and the only reason he pleaded guilty was so he would be quietly put on the sex offenders register without anyone finding out about his charges.
The EDL have spent a lot of their time demonstrating against Asian only paedophiles with several demonstrations in Blackpool against Asian takeaway workers who they claimed murdered Charlene Downes. After a failed court case the police have failed to provide any link with any Asian gangs.
ZHC have destroyed the EDL's presence on social networking groups. In June last year they took their main 100,000 members page and many of their regional divisional pages. Their new page is struggling to get more than 2,000 members with many of those being trolls, antifa, journalists and security services.
The far right organisation have had futher paedophile scandals since with the recent jailing of Michael Coats aka Mickey Blueeyes and Brett Moses who was convicted of trying to groom a 13 yeart old Canadian schoolgirl after travelling to meet her.
EDL Paedophile Michael Coates
Paedophile still active within EDL Leadership - EDL News - EDL News
Originally Posted by magwash
Paedophile(s) still active within ISLAM
Friday 6th January, 2012 - 17:02
Muslim Paedophile and founding member of Islam, Muhammad ibn Abdullah (570 - 632 AD)
A serial rapist and mass-murderer whom all historical records show "consummated" a marriage to a nine year old girl, Aisha, when he was 54; as reported by Sahih Bukhari 5:58:234, Sahih Muslim 8:3311, Abu-Dawud Book 41, Number 4914 etc. etc. ... continued Page 94
Yikes! Thank heavens this obvious LUNATIC didn't found a religion with millions of adherents in this country. Otherwise there'd be gangs of men roaming the streets thinking that the rape of children was fine and sanctioned by their "god"... oh wait.
Last edited by London Pride; 06-01-2012 at 06:56 PM.
EDL news is a pro-Islamist propaganda system setup by Labour25 apologists. The article reeks of desperation with unsourced accusations. Typical propaganda and a disgrace to real media, but like most SWP sub-human vermin, they will do anything, absolutely anything to defend Islamists, as they are a useful asset towards a Communist revolution, which would never work anyway.
London Pride - A very good response. Although I can agree that pedo **** do exist elsewhere, under Islamic culture it is often considered normal. All other religions grow with the law and adapt to suit modern times, but Islam just remains set in stone. I just went to the EDL website and I can't find anyone defending paedophiles, infact the impression I get is that they would have the **** kicked out of them.
Magfash will do anything to defend Islamists, and it wouldn't surprise me if she really is working for Labour25 in order to assist Harriet Harman reduce the age of consent.
Just to put record straight
I am not an active member of the EDL or any other group and have not been for some time now.The reason my name appeared again is due to the fact I opened my old Facebook account just after Christmas for the sole intention of removing myself from such groups I had been involved in of which I (to the best of my knowledge) have done.
Yes I contacted EDL news with a whole explanation of the facts not just to say it would be hushed up!!!
I have copied and pasted it below (In response to original post)
I would just like to put some facts across I was charged and pleaded guilty to downloading 4 level 1 images (lowest level and yes I agree nothing of this nature is acceptable)
This came about whilst typing in the name of a song into the file sharing network 'Limewire' the search engine produces hits based on individual words in the title of what you are searching for,in this case the song title contained the word 'teenage',without paying too much attention and certainly not expecting what happened I highlighted the first approx eight hits (at one time) and hit download which took me 2 seconds if that,upon realising what had happened once they had downloaded (appalled and disgusted as I was to say the least)
I deleted the images and shut down the pc and went out.The following morning my house was raided on which was the morning of the Manchester demo for Facebook group A**** A**** W** T** F*** I* A**** (for which no charges were brought)However I was charged with the above said offence.
In the prosecution files it is stated that the images were found in the recycle bin and they were on the desktop for no longer than 1 minute before being deleted I also quote from the prosecution file 'The file name is the actual name of the 'jpg'picture.
A possible explanation of such a long and explicit filename is that torrent software will often search and return hits based on individual words within the file name.
A file with more individual terms will potentially feature on more results page' I.E If a song title with the words,child,teenage,boy,girl,young,in it for example it would potentially return any files featuring these words I pleaded guilty in court as in fact I was guilty all be it by error and the last thing in the world I wanted was to go to trial and there be a media circus surrounding the case which there would have been this way it could be kept quiet I was subsequently sentenced to 3 years community rehabilitation and 5 years on register which I believe a bit excessive but was not imprisoned for it as you state above it never hit the papers at the time simply because it was not news worthy it wasn't until I was jailed for so called EDL offences and seen as a political prisoner(of which I had no influence)that the authorities decided to publish an exaggerated version of the case.I was also banned from owning a computer for 12 months which is why I found it difficult to defend my name.
I do not wish to be associated with the above named **** it was a stupid F****** ACCIDENT that has taken its toll on my life due to the media and their B******T.It is as simple as that no need for analysing cross examining ect plain and simple as I have said.(And I had cocaine not crack)
Last edited by rich; 01-02-2012 at 09:49 PM.
Why would anybody plead guilty to four counts of making indecent images of children if they were innocent? I know I wouldn't
You have never seen enemy of the people then.
I recomend that You wach it, then You might get it.
Why don't you just tell me what you mean
The British (so called) justice system has little these day to do with actually locking the guilty up, or for that matter punishing the real "Bad-uns", else we would have bankers and politicos filling the scrubs and strangeways.
The system is more interested in making it look like they are doing something.
We have had many cases in the I.T. community of very similar cases to the one mentioned, as it would be hard if not impossible to find any computer without at least a handful of level 1 images, or in many cases far worse without the users knowledge.
As for the justice and sentencing, more often than not, the prosecution and defense get together to make a deal (Plea bargain), asto what would and would not be interest of the system, not the accused or for that matter fairness.
Often the accused is told, (I have personal experience of this) that if He / She pleads guilty to a few minor charges, the more serious may be dropped, but kept on file (This means if an appeal is launched, they would be considered).
Afterall, a case of this kind, never gets proper consideration by a Jury, and so, an accused is in a lose lose situation, as if they go to trial there is little chance of a fair verdict, or even a barely thought-out one.
Therefore, the accused has little choice other than to plead on lesser charges and take a non custodial or short prison sentence, rather than fight it out, with little support from a legal aid uninterested lawyer and get 2 years or more.
Is that clearer?
The mention of Enemy of the People was referring to a Chap who pleaded guilty to get a less severe sentence, in order to try and clear his name after being released.
So surprise surprise the white EDL male didn't do it honest "gov" but two asian guy aquitted by a jury in blackpool are guilty has sin according to the EDL and the BNP. Do you know the prisons are full of innocent people .
WHAT WAS THE MORE SERIOUS CRIME THAT WAS DROPPED.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks