+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 40

Thread: South Tyneside B.C.(Primose Ward)-25th Feb

  1. #1
    Senior Member Shaun is persona non grata Shaun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Gtr.Manchester
    Posts
    1,828

    Default South Tyneside B.C.(Primose Ward)-25th Feb

    Candidates


    BNP
    Con
    Independent(2)
    Labour
    Lib Dem.

  2. #2
    Member Big Englander. has some supporters
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    486

    Default

    Wot, no EDP Candidates, ukip or Greens? They must be saving their funds for the GE, how wise.

  3. #3
    Moderator Richard Allen is a jewel in the rough Richard Allen is a jewel in the rough Richard Allen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,897

    Default

    Ken Stephenson Labour 854
    Pete Hodgkinson British National Party 566
    Aaron Luke Independent 213
    David Alan Rice Independent 174
    Anthony James Lanaghan Conservative 124
    Susan Heather Troupe Liberal Democrats 100


    For the record the result in May 2008 was

    Lab 1005
    BNP 681
    Con 382

  4. #4
    Trusted Member Remington Steele is doing well Remington Steele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Peoples Democratic Republic of Cumbria
    Posts
    2,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Allen View Post
    Ken Stephenson Labour 854
    Pete Hodgkinson British National Party 566
    Aaron Luke Independent 213
    David Alan Rice Independent 174
    Anthony James Lanaghan Conservative 124
    Susan Heather Troupe Liberal Democrats 100


    For the record the result in May 2008 was

    Lab 1005
    BNP 681
    Con 382
    Oooh I bet the BNP aren't chuffed at that one. Only missed it by under 300 votes, that is sickening. Wonder what the turnout was, because every party seems to have done badly.
    Time 4 Griffin to collect his JSA

  5. #5
    Moderator Richard Allen is a jewel in the rough Richard Allen is a jewel in the rough Richard Allen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,897

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Remington Steele View Post
    Oooh I bet the BNP aren't chuffed at that one. Only missed it by under 300 votes, that is sickening. Wonder what the turnout was, because every party seems to have done badly.
    Turnout was 32.2%

  6. #6
    FTH
    FTH is offline
    Senior Member FTH has some supporters FTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Daaan Saaaf
    Posts
    619

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Remington Steele View Post
    Wonder what the turnout was, because every party seems to have done badly.
    Little change. The fact that there were double the number of candidates compared to last time means it's not surprising the shares for Lab/BNP/Con fell. Cons seem to have suffered by far the worse from this.

    Worryingly 60% of the votes were postal. Yes, more "people" (no doubt some deceased included in that ) sent their vote in the post than could be bothered to go to the polling station.........
    Last edited by FTH; 26-02-2010 at 12:26 AM.

  7. #7
    Trusted Member petewalker has some supporters petewalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Round and about
    Posts
    760

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FTH View Post
    Little change. The fact that there were double the number of candidates compared to last time means it's not surprising the shares for Lab/BNP/Con fell. Cons seem to have suffered by far the worse from this.

    Worryingly 60% of the votes were postal. Yes, more "people" (no doubt some deceased included in that ) sent their vote in the post than could be bothered to go to the polling station.........
    Oh, is that why the BNP vote fell from 33% to 28%?

    Anybody noticing a pattern yet?

  8. #8
    Member Big Englander. has some supporters
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    486

    Default

    bnp? Not for me.

  9. #9
    Member Citizen67 is just starting out
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FTH View Post
    Little change. The fact that there were double the number of candidates compared to last time means it's not surprising the shares for Lab/BNP/Con fell. Cons seem to have suffered by far the worse from this.

    Worryingly 60% of the votes were postal. Yes, more "people" (no doubt some deceased included in that ) sent their vote in the post than could be bothered to go to the polling station.........
    60% of votes were Postal!!!? I smell a rat. Electoral fraud is so easy and this is one of the methods used, Get a Postal vote or two, add an extra name to voting registration form, electoral fraud is so easy, giv it go you'll be surprised!

  10. #10
    Member Citizen67 is just starting out
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by petewalker View Post
    Oh, is that why the BNP vote fell from 33% to 28%?

    Anybody noticing a pattern yet?

    every body's, who stood the first time round, vote fell... what are you on about?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts