blueblood1920

BNP 11279 (2nd)
Labour 15264 (1st)
Conseravtives 8563 (3rd)
Lib Dems 2233 (5th)
UKIP 1364 (7th)
English Democrats 633 (10th)
Left List 239 (11th)
Respect 1048 (8th)
Green 1368 (6th)
Abolish Cong 1110 (9th)
Christian 2257 (4th)
One London 79 (13th)
Unity for Peace & Socialism 95 (12th)
Alagaratnam, Rathy 31 (14th)

Valence Ward - Pending by-election
Abolish 50
BNP 598
Christian 69
con 367
ed 27
green 52
lab 528
left 11
lib dem 86
One London 3
Respect 21
UKIP 69
Unity 3
Ala 0

http://results.londonelects.org.uk/R..._city_east.xls

British-Conservatism

It is winnable in the general election.

__________________
http://conservativedemocraticalliance.blogspot.com/

ukiprule

Baking & Dagenham are separate Parliament constituencys

__________________
Membership of the European Union costs Britain £60.1 billion per annum UKIP wants to leave the European Union and spend the money here in Britain.

To put this figure in perspective, just £1 billion would pay for:

222,000 hip replacements
Or 46,893 nurses
Or 38,782 teachers
Or 34, 585 police officers

Agree? Join UKIP
www.ukip.org

blueblood1920

In Barking constituency I calculated that BNP are only 1700 votes away from taking the seat based on these figures. With Barnbrook an AM now that is bound to boost our showing as well.

ukiprule

yeh right 2005 general election results

Labour Margaret Hodge 13,826
Conservative Keith Prince 4,943
British National Party Richard Barnbrook 4,916
Liberal Democrat Toby Wickenden 3,211
UK Independence Terry Jones 803
Green Laurie Cleeland 618
Independent Demetrious Panton 530
Workers' Revolutionary Mick Saxby 59

__________________
Membership of the European Union costs Britain £60.1 billion per annum UKIP wants to leave the European Union and spend the money here in Britain.

To put this figure in perspective, just £1 billion would pay for:

222,000 hip replacements
Or 46,893 nurses
Or 38,782 teachers
Or 34, 585 police officers

Agree? Join UKIP
www.ukip.org

blueblood1920

I said based on the figures from the London results, BNP were on 6000 votes and Labour on 7700 votes. I used the wards in the new constituency and added up the votes for each ward for Labour and BNP. Also in 2005 I dont think BNP had any councillors in B&D, now we have 12 and maybe 13 if a by-election is called and we win.

Aardvark

It's a b@mmer. I'd love to see Hodge lose her seat, but I'm not too sure I'd want Barnbrook in HoC. Labour have no doubt done the maths and will flood the seat with resources which will aid other parties elsewhere.

__________________
When in Woking do as the Wokes do.

"I do not wish to form my opinions by thoughtlessly quoting others; I wish others to support their opinions by sensibly quoting me." Paul Wesson (Aardvark) 13th April 2008

blueblood1920

Will Labour do that though? Or will they focus on defending other seats which they risk losing to the cons? It will be interesting to see how everything pans out.

Aardvark

I think Labour would rather lose 50 seats to the Tories than one to BNP.

The message would be clear - Labour is losing the white working class vote.

If all the blue collar workers vote Tory it could be put down to a million issues, but, no matter what, the BNP is associated with one issue - immigration.

Labour will be desperate not to be humiliated in such a fashion and Hodge is a double edged loss as a member of a senior, and incredibly wealthy, Jewish family could suggest an anti-Semitic bent.

Hodge is not now, nor ever has been, a member of the 'working classes'. She is a filthy rich champagne socialist (who trashed Islington when a council leader there) with no understanding of poverty or hardship, having experienced neither.

Labour will have to defend her with central resources as she might even lose the votes of her own local party members.

__________________
When in Woking do as the Wokes do.

"I do not wish to form my opinions by thoughtlessly quoting others; I wish others to support their opinions by sensibly quoting me." Paul Wesson (Aardvark) 13th April 2008

Like The Roman

I agree with your first paragraph, Aardvark. The simple reason being the Libs, Cons and Labour are one and the same - they are parties that agree to adhere to the constraints imposed upon them by the social marxist ideology that now prevails. Cameron summed the situation up when he said to a chap and I am paraphrasing, "The BNP? I´d rather you voted for anybody other than them".

The truth is the BNP is the alternative to the socially marxist elite that have infiltrated our ´mainstream´ political parties. We will not be cowed by political correctness, and thus having a voice in Parliament that could potentially awaken the electorate to this fact would be a devastating blow that they seek to block at all costs.

They need to maintain the perception that we are all ignorant thugs (before you reply Mike, I have no convictions and am a graduate from an established university) and holocaust deniers (which I am not, nor have ever been).

Their supremacy has to remain unchallenged, and all the other political parties are adherents to the ruling ideology...

__________________
"Have you ever wondered, perhaps, why opinions which the majority of people quite naturally hold are, if anyone dares express them publicly, denounced as 'controversial, 'extremist', 'explosive', 'disgraceful', and overwhelmed with a violence and venom quite unknown to debate on mere political issues? It is because the whole power of the aggressor depends upon preventing people from seeing what is happening and from saying what they see. "

Enoch Powell