Question Time

mkpdavies · 25-04-2008, 01:16 PM

Makes no odds. Pick any one of them three and they all have the same hands stuffed up their **** controling them.

Hartlepool · 25-04-2008, 02:13 PM

You mean like Muppets,they always had someones hand up their asses didn't they?

cassie · 26-04-2008, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vortex

There are though the "ethnic communities", who collectively are probably very tired of being patronised by guilt ridden white liberals, so with the emphasis on the plural the point is just as valid.

More prejudice it seems!

If 'Question Time' is produced solely by 'white liberals' it must be one of the few such BBC programmes.

Are we to accept that just as there are supposed to be only Little Englanders but no Little Scotlanders, there are only 'white liberals' and no 'black liberals'?

-

cassie · 26-04-2008, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

That is intentional. Some people will whine that the others don't have enough seats, or whatever. I say ******** to that.

Ron Paul was ignored, despite being a Congressman and raising more cash than any of the others. If you don't bow down to the overlords who pull the MSM's strings, then you can forget getting any real media coverage.

Same here in Britain. We don't have a democracy. We are force fed ***** and unless you are willing to search out your own candidates, that is what you deserve.

Sadly too many people are too busy, too lazy or too stupid to realise the taste of ***** when they get it. Even this forum has people who will vote for Boris Johnson, just because he isn't red Ken.

The Nazis even told their membership to make him their number 2 choice, even though Boris said he didn't want their vote (IE they are so scummy, he doesn't want their help).

Until people snap out of the MSM driven trance they are in, we are doomed to more punishment and I have to say, most of us deserve it.

OK! I hope you feel better for having divested yourself of that lot, but what do you - the perspicacious citizen - advocate as constructive action to improve the situation?

__________________________________

marcus · 26-04-2008, 07:35 PM

I must say it was a bit ridiculous. You should have made it a 2 hour edition of question time and brought every candidate in. Or had another episode with the other candidates from the minor parties.

This constant discussion about the BNP as well is unbelievable. The BNP votes rises by not having them there I believe. I think an audience member made a good point, Ken is prepared to go and share a platform with a radical Muslim who advocates suicide bomings and the killing of homosexuals, claiming that there must be dialogue. However he refuses to share a platform with the BNP. It all really is rather ridiculous.

Plus all 3 candidates have more or less similar manifestos - some alternatives would have been nice to hear Greens, Left List, BNP etc Would have made a far more interesting debate in my opinion.

We need to let free speech flourish!

mkpdavies · 26-04-2008, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cassie

OK! I hope you feel better for having divested yourself of that lot, but what do you - the perspicacious citizen - advocate as constructive action to improve the situation?

__________________________________

I'd have turned it into a competition with the viewers voting on it.

Individual heats, with every party starting off in sections of 3 or 4, with the winner going through to the next heat, until there is a winner.

Kevin Adamson · 27-04-2008, 05:59 AM

O dear,just watched on rerun TV, what the hell are we going to do now? I thought it was a done deal (all vote for Boris and get Livingstone out)But there is no way I am going to vote for that pillock .

Guess I,ll be one of the .1%

25-04-2008, 01:16 PM	#11 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 30,604	Makes no odds. Pick any one of them three and they all have the same hands stuffed up their **** controling them. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

25-04-2008, 02:13 PM	#12 (permalink)
Hartlepool Uber Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: North East England Posts: 6,660 Party: Free England Party	You mean like Muppets,they always had someones hand up their asses didn't they?

26-04-2008, 07:35 PM	#15 (permalink)
marcus Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 203	I must say it was a bit ridiculous. You should have made it a 2 hour edition of question time and brought every candidate in. Or had another episode with the other candidates from the minor parties. This constant discussion about the BNP as well is unbelievable. The BNP votes rises by not having them there I believe. I think an audience member made a good point, Ken is prepared to go and share a platform with a radical Muslim who advocates suicide bomings and the killing of homosexuals, claiming that there must be dialogue. However he refuses to share a platform with the BNP. It all really is rather ridiculous. Plus all 3 candidates have more or less similar manifestos - some alternatives would have been nice to hear Greens, Left List, BNP etc Would have made a far more interesting debate in my opinion. We need to let free speech flourish!

27-04-2008, 05:59 AM	#17 (permalink)
Kevin Adamson Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Surrey Posts: 864 Party: UKIP	O dear,just watched on rerun TV, what the hell are we going to do now? I thought it was a done deal (all vote for Boris and get Livingstone out)But there is no way I am going to vote for that pillock . Guess I,ll be one of the .1%