British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > Elections and Candidates > Elections Archive > Crewe & Nantwich By-Election


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23-05-2008, 07:22 AM   #21 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 826
prober is just starting out
Default

The harsh reality is that the scenerio has come down to people's pockets being hit by ruling party actions, making it a 2 party exercise with viting Tory being the most effective way of punishing the government. In this all smaller parties including Greens get swept aside.

Bearing mind how little UKIP has developed since 2004 in connecting with the public hearts on what is important to it ,( let alone explaining how the EU impacts adversely on their lives ) the result is a credit to local UKIP efforts. ( thank goodness not beaten by loonies/beauties etc & nott having to deal with a BNP vote )

For the future, UKIP has to face up to a resurgent confident Tory Party that may feel it can ignore UKIP on the basis that minor erosion of Tory vote by UKIP is now of no consequence.

The interesting thing is a Lib Dem comment in the Commons on the lines of " The time of the Labour Party in history is beginning to be over as no longer representing the people for what it was founded for .... time for it to be replaced by a left of centre Lib Dem Party" . Realignment of politics ? Time for a UKIP partly as a pressure group on Tories to rethink where it needs to target and get its vote from ?
prober is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 23-05-2008, 07:26 AM   #22 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,508
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aardvark View Post
One vote per property owned, Mike?
Yes why not. Supplementary properties to be in any value band of course.

I suppose we could go for the old Prussian system under which electors have multiple votes dependent on wealth and status. These votes are used to select an electoral college which then chooses the members of the diet.

Or why don't we just take the vote away from any traitor who supports a pro-EU party?
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2008, 07:35 AM   #23 (permalink)
Member
 
AlanA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bolton
Posts: 179
AlanA is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

A pathetic result for UKIP, particularly, as they put up a so called 'big gun' in there. The message is clearly not getting across.
Time for the pompous oaf Farage to rethink his position !
AlanA is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2008, 07:41 AM   #24 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Westcountryman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Westcountry.
Posts: 5,922
Party: None
Westcountryman is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlanA View Post
A pathetic result for UKIP, particularly, as they put up a so called 'big gun' in there. The message is clearly not getting across.
Time for the pompous oaf Farage to rethink his position !
UKIP did better than all of the other 'minor' parties. That's worth something at least.
__________________
Manus haec inimica tyrannis ense petit placidam sub libertate quietam - "This hand of mine, which is hostile to tyrants, seeks by the sword quiet peace under liberty."
Westcountryman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2008, 07:44 AM   #25 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,982
Clippo is just starting out
Default

(Swallows deeply) – I agree with AlanA (and AB) – I think this is a poor result for UKIP.

Although the EU issue is of minimal priority to most voters at GE or even by-election times, I thought UKIP still might have been carried along more than they were by the general right-wing backlash against Nu-labour.

As they stand now, UKIP has nothing to offer.
Clippo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2008, 08:08 AM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
komerad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cardiff. S.Wales
Posts: 557
komerad is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Westcountryman View Post
UKIP did better than all of the other 'minor' parties. That's worth something at least.
WCM - I disagree "All the other minor parties" consisted of 2 independents, Monster LP, EDP, & a nutter nobody has heard of.
The only passable result is beating the Green party & this after bringing in one of UKIP's "top guns", for a miserable 2.2%.
How this can be considered a good result completely confounds me
ATM - I'm afraid, UKIP is going nowhere
komerad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2008, 08:14 AM   #27 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
cookie65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: hyde cheshire
Posts: 639
cookie65 is just starting out
Default

Get real . This is a very good 4th place in a by-election with 10 candidates. Everybody knew the Lab/Tory fight would attract most of the votes thereby squeezing everybody else's vote share. MN beat the next closest candidate by a factor of nearly 3 to 1 , This despite almost no Media coverage.
cookie65 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2008, 08:15 AM   #28 (permalink)
Member
 
ukiprule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 359
Party: UKIP
ukiprule is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by komerad View Post
WCM - I disagree "All the other minor parties" consisted of 2 independents, Monster LP, EDP, & a nutter nobody has heard of.
The only passable result is beating the Green party & this after bringing in one of UKIP's "top guns", for a miserable 2.2%.
How this can be considered a good result completely confounds me
ATM - I'm afraid, UKIP is going nowhere
Komered did you visit crewe , and help the ukip campagin?
__________________
Membership of the European Union costs Britain £60.1 billion per annum UKIP wants to leave the European Union and spend the money here in Britain.

To put this figure in perspective, just £1 billion would pay for:

222,000 hip replacements
Or 46,893 nurses
Or 38,782 teachers
Or 34, 585 police officers

Agree? Join UKIP
www.ukip.org

Last edited by ukiprule; 23-05-2008 at 08:22 AM.
ukiprule is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2008, 08:29 AM   #29 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 30,604
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

I think we are fully in the grip of the puppet show at the moment. It has been drilled into to people so much that you either have to be blue or red, that exactly that is happening. "Others" has collapsed of late. Seriously, UKIP manged to get the 4th place expected, but 2.2% really does show how far it has to go.

I don't think the UKIP strategy was right at all, but there was a lot of effort so they deserved better on that alone.

Even if UKIP had run a kick **** campaign, I still don't think it would have made HUGE amounts of difference. We have to work out how to break people out of the spell of the MSM. They are being ordered to vote for puppets and are thus puppets themselves.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2008, 08:40 AM   #30 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,508
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by komerad View Post
WCM - I disagree "All the other minor parties" consisted of 2 independents, Monster LP, EDP, & a nutter nobody has heard of.
The only passable result is beating the Green party & this after bringing in one of UKIP's "top guns", for a miserable 2.2%.
How this can be considered a good result completely confounds me
ATM - I'm afraid, UKIP is going nowhere
Looks like the BNP didn't stand. What happened to them?

Just as well they didn't or they might have beaten UKIP.
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0