British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Political Parties > Conservative Party General Issues


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19-09-2007, 02:20 AM   #1 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default Cameron now most unpopular party leader new poll says as Tory vote reduces

David Cameron, the pro-EU and anti-UKIP leader of the Conservative Party, is now more unpopular than the other party leaders according to a new opinion from ICM published in today’s Guardian.

Brief edited extracts from the Guardian: “The poll was largely carried out after news of the Northern Rock crisis broke, which might have been expected to harm (Labour Prime Minister) Mr. Brown. Instead it offers bad news across the board for the Conservatives. Cameron is in trouble with Conservative voters – he has a net positive rating of only 25% with them. Cameron was seen as an asset to his party – this appears to be changing. Mr. Cameron's efforts to reposition his party do not appear to have widened its pool of potential support. Public satisfaction with Mr. Cameron's leadership has slipped while the party has lost its advantage on major policy issues including crime, the environment and taxation.”

Key points from the ICM poll: Vote shares: Labour 40% (up 1%). Conservatives 32% (down 2%). Liberal Dims 20% (up 2%). Personal ratings (all voters): Brown + 32% (55% approve, 23% do not approve). Cameron + 8% (37% approve, 45% do not approve). Campbell (Lib Dim Party leader) - 2% (39% approve, 41% do not approve).

ICM say that if the above voting intentions were repeated at a General Election Labour would actually increase its majority in the House of Commons with 380 Labour MPs elected.

At 32%, the Cameron-Conservatives are on a lower share of the vote in the ICM poll than they got at the last General Election or when Iain Duncan-Smith was leader of the party (2001 - 2003).

Figures quoted above from:

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/libde...172188,00.html
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 19-09-2007, 09:39 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 608
ANGLO-STAFFS is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Britannist View Post
David Cameron, the pro-EU and anti-UKIP leader of the Conservative Party, is now more unpopular than the other party leaders according to a new opinion from ICM published in today’s Guardian.


Key points from the ICM poll: Vote shares: Labour 40% (up 1%). Conservatives 32% (down 2%). Liberal Dims 20% (up 2%). Personal ratings (all voters): Brown + 32% (55% approve, 23% do not approve). Cameron + 8% (37% approve, 45% do not approve). Campbell (Lib Dim Party leader) - 2% (39% approve, 41% do not approve).

ICM say that if the above voting intentions were repeated at a General Election Labour would actually increase its majority in the House of Commons with 380 Labour MPs elected.

At 32%, the Cameron-Conservatives are on a lower share of the vote in the ICM poll than they got at the last General Election or when Iain Duncan-Smith was leader of the party (2001 - 2003).

Figures quoted above from:

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/libde...172188,00.html
If this trend continues could this be bad news for UKIP? Traditionaly the Tories, and their supporters, have been seen as the least EU minded of the big three. These polls point to the two strongest EU supporting parties gaining while the Cam-Cons are falling.
ANGLO-STAFFS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2007, 10:01 AM   #3 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
kernow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,023
kernow has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ANGLO-STAFFS View Post
If this trend continues could this be bad news for UKIP? .
Not really. Tory supporters will turn somewhere hopefully to UKIP if the Tory party collapses. Real Tories would never vote Labour and only the Tory "Wets", e.g Clarke, Heseltine, Howe and Herd and other Tories of their ilk would vote Lib Dem. UKIP are the only right of centre party they realistically could go to. The actual Tory MPs are a different kettle of fish! Being career politicians they will go for whatever party offers them the best chance of continuing to feather their nest!
kernow is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2007, 10:22 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 608
ANGLO-STAFFS is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kernow View Post
Not really. Tory supporters will turn somewhere hopefully to UKIP if the Tory party collapses. Real Tories would never vote Labour and only the Tory "Wets", e.g Clarke, Heseltine, Howe and Herd and other Tories of their ilk would vote Lib Dem. UKIP are the only right of centre party they realistically could go to. The actual Tory MPs are a different kettle of fish! Being career politicians they will go for whatever party offers them the best chance of continuing to feather their nest!
In which case it will be good for the UKIP but very bad for the anti-EU couse. I doubt if there will be enough support moving from the tories to UKIP to elect shed loads of UKIP MP's. It will mean that the tory vote will be spread about allowing the Pro-EU parties to increase their hold on Westminster.

Rock and hard place spring to mind
ANGLO-STAFFS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2007, 11:09 AM   #5 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
kernow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,023
kernow has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ANGLO-STAFFS View Post
In which case it will be good for the UKIP but very bad for the anti-EU couse. I doubt if there will be enough support moving from the tories to UKIP to elect shed loads of UKIP MP's. It will mean that the tory vote will be spread about allowing the Pro-EU parties to increase their hold on Westminster.
I don't understand what you mean by "good for UKIP, bad for the anti EU cause" UKIP are the senior anti EU party. Cameron has already stated that he wants Britain to remain in the EU and Brown and Ming aren't exactly gagging to get us out!

Last edited by kernow; 19-09-2007 at 11:14 AM. Reason: needed to add a sentence.
kernow is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2007, 11:15 AM   #6 (permalink)
rjt
Uber Member
 
rjt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aldershot
Posts: 5,292
rjt is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ANGLO-STAFFS View Post
In which case it will be good for the UKIP but very bad for the anti-EU couse. I doubt if there will be enough support moving from the tories to UKIP to elect shed loads of UKIP MP's. It will mean that the tory vote will be spread about allowing the Pro-EU parties to increase their hold on Westminster.

Rock and hard place spring to mind

That is exactly what will happen, when Labour split in the 1980s and the SDP was formed it simply made it easier for Mrs Thatcher to win.
__________________
Mr Delors said that he wanted the European Parliament to be the democratic body of the community, The Commission to be The Executive and The Council Of Ministers The Senate. NO! NO! NO!
(Margaret Thatcher 30 Oct 1990)

Ignore List: The Prophets of ST Al the Unelectable.
rjt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2007, 11:22 AM   #7 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
eublues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,014
eublues is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I've no time for Cameron, but how can the public possibly think that Brown has any merits.
eublues is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2007, 11:38 AM   #8 (permalink)
rjt
Uber Member
 
rjt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aldershot
Posts: 5,292
rjt is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eublues View Post
I've no time for Cameron, but how can the public possibly think that Brown has any merits.
Brown is boring and after 10 years of false grins I think people are in the mood for soemthing a bit dour.
__________________
Mr Delors said that he wanted the European Parliament to be the democratic body of the community, The Commission to be The Executive and The Council Of Ministers The Senate. NO! NO! NO!
(Margaret Thatcher 30 Oct 1990)

Ignore List: The Prophets of ST Al the Unelectable.
rjt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2007, 12:25 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 608
ANGLO-STAFFS is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kernow View Post
I don't understand what you mean by "good for UKIP, bad for the anti EU cause" UKIP are the senior anti EU party. Cameron has already stated that he wants Britain to remain in the EU and Brown and Ming aren't exactly gagging to get us out!
I mean that if UKIP get 50-100,000 extra votes and maybe a couple of MP's. It will not make a snowball in hells difference to the EU. If the Tory vote collapses then, (IMHO), it will be because lots of Tory voters stay at home. If UKIP supporters expect battalions of disaffected Tories to march into the polling stations and vote UKIP then I think there will be a few tears on the Friday morning. If the Cam-Con's go into meltdown then Lab and the Lib-Dems will prosper. They will then, quite rightly, be able to claim that they have a mandate to do whatever they like vis-a-vis Europe. As for UKIP really benefiting, it aint gonner appen.
ANGLO-STAFFS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2007, 01:28 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 587
Phil Sheldon is just starting out
Default

As for UKIP really benefiting, it aint gonner appen.

That depends on how effectively NF marshalls all available resources and puts a bomb under the backside of Whoever-is-in charge-of-publicity.

IMHO the SNP should serve as a model of how to fight for,and win,power.
Phil Sheldon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0