Reported Post by mkpdavies

mkpdavies · 07-11-2007, 10:04 PM

mkpdavies has reported a post.

Reason:

Quote:

Abuse

Post: Interview with Bjorn Lomborg
Forum: Environment & Energy
Assigned Moderators: N/A

Posted by: Wolfie Smith
Original Content:

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

Effectively Implementing CO2

I reckon about there would be good. A nice optimum lelve of 1500, so we get optimum crop growth. A few thousand more, or a few hundred less would probably be fine too though.

For Humans

http://en.scientificcommons.org/18306498

No probs at 3% CO2 (compared to 0.035% in atmosphere now).

So I think to be safe we'll say it's best for humans (and this is just my opinion), it being below 1% is a nice conservative level.

As I don't think we will change it much either way, without doing something very drastic (such as nuke the planet), its irrelevant really. As nature may decide to wipe us out one day. Though, I might start getting concerned when levels are about 50 times what they are now.

You, my friend, are barking.

Alex McKee · 08-11-2007, 02:59 AM

Indeed, abusive. Warning issued to the member.

Besoeker · 08-11-2007, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex McKee

Indeed, abusive. Warning issued to the member.

Seems a little harsh.

Alex McKee · 09-11-2007, 01:22 AM

Just trying to honour the zero tolerance policy I started.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

08-11-2007, 02:59 AM	#2 (permalink)
Alex McKee Moderator Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Gloucester Posts: 6,638	Indeed, abusive. Warning issued to the member.

09-11-2007, 01:22 AM	#4 (permalink)
Alex McKee Moderator Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Gloucester Posts: 6,638	Just trying to honour the zero tolerance policy I started.