Closed thread policy

[For_England]

Originally Posted by Anthony Butcher

Whatever the moderators feel constitutes promotion.

Promotion is one thing, but you deleted posts simply documenting that it wasn't a socialist party. Think what you like about them, but you should have some integrity when it comes to reporting the truth. Nor can you answer a simple question - if they are socialist, why did you delete a post arguing for privatisation, since that isn't BNP policy at all in your world? I won't hold my breath for a logical response.

[For_England]

Originally Posted by Smidgey

It was fun and stimulating discussing economics in that thread...

Too bad it is closed now.

Smidgey, it wasn't our conversation that closed the thread, and we weren't even talking about the BNP. Just respond to my last post in a new thread, and I'm sure no-one will find it objectionable (right AB?)

[Anthony Butcher]

Discussion of BNP policy counts as promotion. Links to the BNP website, in the context of discussion about the BNP, also constitute promotion.

[For_England]

Originally Posted by Anthony Butcher

Discussion of BNP policy counts as promotion. Links to the BNP website, in the context of discussion about the BNP, also constitute promotion.

That makes it impossible for me to answer unfactual statements. Again though, you have been caught out by my question - if state socialism is BNP policy, the posting to an article advocating private ownership cannot constitute promoting BNP policy; either that or you should - by universal standards of decency which do not rely upon whether someone runs a forum or not - admit as much. But whatever I think of all that, you are nevertheless the boss, and in this case at least, 'might is right'. However, to avoid further trouble do I have permission to continue the discussion with Smidgey on a new thread, since that particular discussion received little or no mention of the 'nasty' party?

[Anthony Butcher]

Economic discussion is absolutely fine. Just don't link to or quote BNP policies.