Political bias in the Courts

Shaun · 31-05-2008, 03:07 PM

What do you know for certain that he had been doing?
BNP smiles to fool the voters in Stoke-on-Trent | The Sun |HomePage|News

BonnieDundee · 01-06-2008, 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by British-Conservatism

The jury agreed he was guilty they offered no opinion on if anything else the defendents said was true.

The jury chose to find him guilty of manslaughter and not murder, which means they must have agreed with alot of what the defendents said.

BonnieDundee · 01-06-2008, 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blueblood1920

What evidence is put forward that Mr Brown was a racist? We have Asian men admitting on national news that Mr Brown was not a racist, so what gives the Bear the right to say he was a racist and deserved what he got?

Simple, the jury found him guilty of manslaughter and not murder.

Quote:

Bear you are a filthy specimen of a human being.

Says the BNP member, he is alot better than you from my experience.

Shaun · 02-06-2008, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BonnieDundee

Simple, the jury found him guilty of manslaughter and not murder.

Says the BNP member, he is alot better than you from my experience.

So there we have it!

Since the Jury convicted Khan of manslaughter,Mr.Brown must be a racist!

Most cases of this kind end with a manslaughter conviction;juries never offer an opinion on the victim.

BonnieDundee · 02-06-2008, 12:43 PM

Rubbish, juries if what the BNP is putting about were true it would be a clear cut case of murder. All evidence points otherwise. The BNP are just telling lies again.

Shaun · 02-06-2008, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BonnieDundee

Rubbish, juries if what the BNP is putting about were true it would be a clear cut case of murder. All evidence points otherwise. The BNP are just telling lies again.

What did I say that was rubbish?

BonnieDundee · 02-06-2008, 12:57 PM

The suggestion that a conviction of manslaughter means that the jury weren't provided overwhelming evidence the victim was a racist and harrasser.

Shaun · 02-06-2008, 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BonnieDundee

The suggestion that a conviction of manslaughter means that the jury weren't provided overwhelming evidence the victim was a racist and harrasser.

I repeat again that most cases like this end with a conviction for manslaughter and that juries offer no opinion on the victim.

02-06-2008, 12:43 PM	#105 (permalink)
BonnieDundee Uber Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Between Mallaig and Cornwall. Posts: 2,809	Rubbish, juries if what the BNP is putting about were true it would be a clear cut case of murder. All evidence points otherwise. The BNP are just telling lies again. __________________ "It is poor civic hygiene to install technologies that could someday facilitate a police state." -Bruce Schneier How to Overthrow the System: brew your own beer; kick in your TV; build your own cabin and pss off front porch whenever you bloody well feel like it.* Edward Abbey Leopold Kohr.

02-06-2008, 12:57 PM	#107 (permalink)
BonnieDundee Uber Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Between Mallaig and Cornwall. Posts: 2,809	The suggestion that a conviction of manslaughter means that the jury weren't provided overwhelming evidence the victim was a racist and harrasser. __________________ "It is poor civic hygiene to install technologies that could someday facilitate a police state." -Bruce Schneier How to Overthrow the System: brew your own beer; kick in your TV; build your own cabin and pss off front porch whenever you bloody well feel like it.* Edward Abbey Leopold Kohr.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

31-05-2008, 03:07 PM	#101 (permalink)
Shaun Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Gtr.Manchester Posts: 461 Party: None	What do you know for certain that he had been doing? BNP smiles to fool the voters in Stoke-on-Trent \| The Sun \|HomePage\|News