British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > General Politics > British Politics & Other Parties


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-05-2008, 09:18 AM   #81 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
blueblood1920's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 971
Party: BNP
blueblood1920 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dissident Congress View Post
Sharon Ebanks is 100% white. Her real father was white and worked in a drop-forge in Smethwick. Sharon takes the surname Ebanks because her mother was previously married to Radwell Ebanks, who was black, but later divorced him. Sharon's real mother wanted to marry Sharon's real father but couldn't because he was already married!
If that is true then why not apology in the local paper that exposed her mixed race heritage. She is a very nasty lady who I have never liked even when she was a high ranking BNP member, I had arguments with her on many things because of her comments on things like race and jews. She was also expelled from the party for her comments on jews because she was anti-semitic.

Now her mother has said he father was Radwell, she looks like she is mixed race and there has been no appology in the local paper saying that their expose was not true. The mixed race white supremacist anti-semite can deny it all she wants, but she needs to provide evidence that she is 100% white.

blueblood1920 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 12-05-2008, 09:42 AM   #82 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 30,615
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

Pure comedy gold.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 10:17 AM   #83 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 540
Dissident Congress is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueblood1920 View Post
If that is true then why not apology in the local paper that exposed her mixed race heritage. She is a very nasty lady who I have never liked even when she was a high ranking BNP member, I had arguments with her on many things because of her comments on things like race and jews. She was also expelled from the party for her comments on jews because she was anti-semitic.
The mass media has a policy on giving bad press to or smearing anybody who is or has been a member of the BNP. The editor of a particular newspaper owes Sharon Ebanks an apology but won't give it because he/she knows that Sharon Ebanks is unlikely to be able to sue for libel.

Sharon Ebanks is not high on the list of potential new members of DC, and I have received allegations that she has behaved irresponsibly in a political situation more than once.
__________________
Promoting Populist Patriotism

Our Nation - Our People - Our Heritage - Our Future
Dissident Congress is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 11:10 AM   #84 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 45
gina is just starting out
Default Whose side?

Blue Blood, you do show the BNP in a disgusting light. If you are campaigning for them you should support the other side because you turn pople off.
gina is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 12:16 PM   #85 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oxonia
Posts: 3,121
Aardvark has some supporters
Default

Okay, 'tidied up' the thread. Sorry I had to remove the sensible comments with the problematic ones, but it is easier to delete a post than edit it. Those who have had posts removed know why; stick to things that are provable and don't put any of us at risk.
__________________
When in Woking do as the Wokes do.

"I do not wish to form my opinions by thoughtlessly quoting others; I wish others to support their opinions by sensibly quoting me." Paul Wesson (Aardvark) 13th April 2008
Aardvark is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 12:18 PM   #86 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 773
david H is just starting out
Default

You really operate on a low, petty lervel. Who cares about Sharon Ebanks? She was an ordinary member of a minor political party and now she's gone after being betrayed by your leaders. If you are serious about saving our country and giving our children a future you need to think more constructively and stop being petty-minded.
Of all pposters on here I am the most sympathetic to your party. But I would never offer any practical support as long as your leader has foul-mouther ranters like Barnes, and twice exposed N
david H is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 12:26 PM   #87 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
blueblood1920's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 971
Party: BNP
blueblood1920 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by david H View Post
You really operate on a low, petty lervel. Who cares about Sharon Ebanks? She was an ordinary member of a minor political party and now she's gone after being betrayed by your leaders. If you are serious about saving our country and giving our children a future you need to think more constructively and stop being petty-minded.
Of all pposters on here I am the most sympathetic to your party. But I would never offer any practical support as long as your leader has foul-mouther ranters like Barnes, and twice exposed N
I am not the biggest fan of Barnes, but I am not going to let people just post lies about the leadership in order to smear Nick. If Barnes had sent out that email then I would of been calling for his head, but he didnt make it. I am also not bothered about if Barnes goes, he would be no loss in my opinion.

Also no one betrayed anyone, the party gave advice against contesting the election but she felt that she would win and didnt follow the advice of the party. I would hardly call that betraying someone.
blueblood1920 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 01:38 PM   #88 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 4,984
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dissident Congress View Post
1. DC has a branch in Birmingham with somebody who happens to have met Sharon Ebanks.

2. I don't want any more smears and lies about Sharon Ebanks circulating on the internet, especially those that are libel. Sharon has resigned from politics because of reasons resulting from personal family matters.
That doesn't explain how you 'know', unless you have seen her DNA test.
Why is it a 'libel' to say that her father was Black?

People are always calling me a racist but as far as I am concerned:

1) You should judge every individual on his/her merits and not by the colour of their skin.

2) If the woman's mother is English then she is English as far as I am concerned.

If the papers have told falsehoods about the identity of her father, she should have demanded retractions and then complained to the PCC.

Last edited by Mikeuk; 12-05-2008 at 01:40 PM.
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 01:47 PM   #89 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Poole in Dorset
Posts: 1,820
Party: Other
Populist Lee is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dissident Congress View Post

Sharon Ebanks is not high on the list of potential new members of DC . . .
Just about the last person in the entire World I should say.
__________________
ENGLISH POPULISM
Stands as the only obstacle in the path of the Plutocrats
who seek to reduce all the Peoples of the World
to Economic and Political Slavery under
Globalism



POPULISM MEANS WHAT YOU WANT IS WHAT YOU GET
Populist Lee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008, 04:04 PM   #90 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,428
22ANDUK is just starting out
Default

What a bunch of irrational, small minded and unitelligent savages.

Last edited by 22ANDUK; 12-05-2008 at 04:07 PM.
22ANDUK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and FuzzFizz
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0