I Will Post This Before Bulter Does

ANGLO-STAFFS · 29-04-2008, 09:08 AM

http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/Campaign_News_As_he_battles_to_become_London's_may or,_the_bizarre_truth_about_the_BNP_boss_...-ref954

An article from the Searchlight site but a Daily Mail story.

Searchlight and the media seem to have given up trying to stop the BNP from getting a seat so they are turning their guns elsewhere. I couldn't care less that they try to tear Barnbrook apart; he has put himself in the firing line. But in the above story the Mail "reveals" that Barnbrook was married to a Met' police officer.
They point out that they are not allowed to give her name because of her job, but then say where and when they were married and that she has reverted to her maiden name. Even a searchlight researcher could find out her name from this. (Couldn’t you Bulter).
I think that this is a totally disgusting abuse of media responsibilities. This woman could now be a target for any sicko who thinks it is an easy way to get at the BNP.

In the article much is made of Barnbrook never mentioning her. Well maybe, just maybe, he has a slight sense of decency and did not want to drag her into possible danger.

blueblood1920 · 29-04-2008, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ANGLO-STAFFS

http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/Campaign_News_As_he_battles_to_become_London's_may or,_the_bizarre_truth_about_the_BNP_boss_...-ref954

An article from the Searchlight site but a Daily Mail story.

Searchlight and the media seem to have given up trying to stop the BNP from getting a seat so they are turning their guns elsewhere. I couldn't care less that they try to tear Barnbrook apart; he has put himself in the firing line. But in the above story the Mail "reveals" that Barnbrook was married to a Met' police officer.
They point out that they are not allowed to give her name because of her job, but then say where and when they were married and that she has reverted to her maiden name. Even a searchlight researcher could find out her name from this. (Couldn’t you Bulter).
I think that this is a totally disgusting abuse of media responsibilities. This woman could now be a target for any sicko who thinks it is an easy way to get at the BNP.

In the article much is made of Barnbrook never mentioning her. Well maybe, just maybe, he has a slight sense of decency and did not want to drag her into possible danger.

Here here, they alsoi clearly state that the divorce process is still running but coming to a close. These things can take a while, he cant put his life on hold because we have a **** legal system. Also its not like Simone doesnt know about her as she was with both them when discussing the divorce, also its not like hes married to Simone yet therefor he hasnt broke any laws unlike many many muslims in this country.
This woman also states that they had an agreement not to talk about each other but first chance she gets she goes and sells her story to the papers.
If thats the worst they can throw at us now then I am one very happy boy. Roll on May 1st!

ANGLO-STAFFS · 29-04-2008, 09:44 AM

BB1920.
Please do not confuse me with someone who gives a S H 1T about damage to Barnbrook or the BNP. My concern is for his 'ex' wife and anyone close to her.
Your version of accuracy is almost as clear as Searchlight.
I didn't think that as a serving Police officer she was allowed to "sell" her story. Unlike Clarke and Barnbrook, if they wished to.

blueblood1920 · 29-04-2008, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ANGLO-STAFFS

BB1920.
Please do not confuse me with someone who gives a S H 1T about damage to Barnbrook or the BNP. My concern is for his 'ex' wife and anyone close to her.
Your version of accuracy is almost as clear as Searchlight.
I didn't think that as a serving Police officer she was allowed to "sell" her story. Unlike Clarke and Barnbrook, if they wished to.

Maybe by keeping her name out of the story she can sell it?

29-04-2008, 09:08 AM	#1 (permalink)
ANGLO-STAFFS Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 506	I Will Post This Before Bulter Does http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/Campaign_News_As_he_battles_to_become_London's_may or,_the_bizarre_truth_about_the_BNP_boss_...-ref954 An article from the Searchlight site but a Daily Mail story. Searchlight and the media seem to have given up trying to stop the BNP from getting a seat so they are turning their guns elsewhere. I couldn't care less that they try to tear Barnbrook apart; he has put himself in the firing line. But in the above story the Mail "reveals" that Barnbrook was married to a Met' police officer. They point out that they are not allowed to give her name because of her job, but then say where and when they were married and that she has reverted to her maiden name. Even a searchlight researcher could find out her name from this. (Couldn’t you Bulter). I think that this is a totally disgusting abuse of media responsibilities. This woman could now be a target for any sicko who thinks it is an easy way to get at the BNP. In the article much is made of Barnbrook never mentioning her. Well maybe, just maybe, he has a slight sense of decency and did not want to drag her into possible danger.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

29-04-2008, 09:44 AM	#3 (permalink)
ANGLO-STAFFS Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 506	BB1920. Please do not confuse me with someone who gives a S H 1T about damage to Barnbrook or the BNP. My concern is for his 'ex' wife and anyone close to her. Your version of accuracy is almost as clear as Searchlight. I didn't think that as a serving Police officer she was allowed to "sell" her story. Unlike Clarke and Barnbrook, if they wished to.