Griffin Defeated in Court

For_England · 11-04-2008, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blueblood1920

They hardly won, they won certain points over English courts jurisdiction over Scots. However the BNP managed to get their property back, membership lists returned/destroyed and the injuction extended. I dont think the party cares about the jurisdiction of English Courts over scots as long as they get their property and membership lists back.
The only downfall is that both parties have to pay the costs, instead of just the rebels.

I only realised recently that they have still been holding the membership lists - that has hurt the party directly and is a disgrace.

blueblood1920 · 11-04-2008, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by For_England

I only realised recently that they have still been holding the membership lists - that has hurt the party directly and is a disgrace.

So would you agree that Nick was forced to go to court in order to get these lists back?

British Bairn · 11-04-2008, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by For_England

I only realised recently that they have still been holding the membership lists - that has hurt the party directly and is a disgrace.

I think you will find that the BNP still has the current membership list.

For_England · 11-04-2008, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blueblood1920

So would you agree that Nick was forced to go to court in order to get these lists back?

I'm trying to clarify what was taken. Was it the only up-to-date list, leaving the BNP without knowledge of its members, or just one of many copies, as Nicholla Smith argued when I presented this question to her earlier on the other forum? Even if the latter, it might have warranted action - definitely for the former.

Hunter · 11-04-2008, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by For_England

I'm trying to clarify what was taken. Was it the only up-to-date list, leaving the BNP without knowledge of its members, or just one of many copies, as Nicholla Smith argued when I presented this question to her earlier on the other forum? Even if the latter, it might have warranted action - definitely for the former.

I think both cases are actionable. The list was being used by the 'rebels' to contact BNP members to encourage them to leave the Party. I was one of them and objected to the fact that non-BNP members were using my personal details.

This is one of the main issues that turned a lot of potential 'rebels' against them, and made those who supported them initially, realise something wasn't quite right.

For_England · 11-04-2008, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hunter

I think both cases are actionable. The list was being used by the 'rebels' to contact BNP members to encourage them to leave the Party. I was one of them and objected to the fact that non-BNP members were using my personal details.

This is one of the main issues that turned a lot of potential 'rebels' against them, and made those who supported them initially, realise something wasn't quite right.

Yes, both are actionable - i only hesitated with the latter because of the costs and risks involved. but i can understand your feelings, and at the time I questioned whether such actions wouldn't turn people against them.

British Bairn · 11-04-2008, 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hunter

I think both cases are actionable. The list was being used by the 'rebels' to contact BNP members to encourage them to leave the Party. I was one of them and objected to the fact that non-BNP members were using my personal details.

This is one of the main issues that turned a lot of potential 'rebels' against them, and made those who supported them initially, realise something wasn't quite right.

Neither of the two bulletins issued by the "rebels" encouraged the membership to leave the BNP, they did however suggest that members held off renewing their memberships until the usual February cut off date.

Do you not think that they had a duty of care to the membership to let them know what was wrong/going on within the party so that the membership could decide for themselves?

The Bear · 12-04-2008, 06:37 AM

At least a copy of the details of all the BNP slime balls will now be in the hands of the authorities. That has to be a step in the right direction.

Hartlepool · 12-04-2008, 08:36 AM

That's good,and if we think about it,that list can only get shorter as time passes,good news.

C_steam · 12-04-2008, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by For_England

A full report was given by 'aberdeen' on the new independent nationalist forum.

Good. So head over there and discuss your BNP stuff.

Thread locked.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

12-04-2008, 06:37 AM	#18 (permalink)
The Bear Uber Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: East Anglia Posts: 2,178	At least a copy of the details of all the BNP slime balls will now be in the hands of the authorities. That has to be a step in the right direction.

12-04-2008, 08:36 AM	#19 (permalink)
Hartlepool Uber Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: North East England Posts: 6,646 Party: Other	That's good,and if we think about it,that list can only get shorter as time passes,good news.