British-Conservatism

In Spring 2005 economic inactivity (people neither employed nor actively seeking work, yet of working age) in England was 16.1 per cent for males, 26.6 per cent for females and 21.2 per cent overall. Economic inactivity worsened for males in every region between 1992 and 2005 but improved for females in all regions apart from London.
Overall economic inactivity increased in seven regions and decreased in two (the South West and West Midlands) over this period.
Economic inactivity was greatest in London, where 25.2 per cent of people were economically inactive, and least in the South West with 18.1 per cent of people inactive.
Female economic inactivity ranged from 21.9 per cent in the South West to 32.6 per cent in London. Male economic inactivity ranged from 13.1 per cent in the South East to 21.9 per cent in the North East.

__________________
http://conservativedemocraticalliance.blogspot.com/

Hunter

If these figures are correct, it would explain why Labour have opened the floodgates to immigrants.

TannyD

Yeah, to delibrately worsen the chances of those unemployed to get work, if their as people willing to work for much less why employ the unemployed native workers.

__________________
Ignore/Avoid List: youcanhandlethetruth.

The Bear

Those figures are correct, and the damage is far more than just further overcrowding of Britain.

TannyD

I dread to think of all the aspects and the total damage incurred.

__________________
Ignore/Avoid List: youcanhandlethetruth.

Vortex

Hang on that's a misleading thread title isn't it? Yes they may be technically unemployed but the figures presumably include people who have retired. The reference is to economically inactivity rather than unemployment.

The Guvnah

1) Reduction in living standards and the basic ability to live among the poorer of the host population,

2) Increase in real and perceived long term insecurity of the host population,

3) Decrease in host population's immediate security,

4) Disinclination of the host population to reproduce,

5) At some future point even the combined unanimous electoral vote by the host population will be insufficient to outnumber the immigrant vote and at that point the game is over with only one avenue left open.

6) Erosion and final removal of the last vestiges of western culture from these islands.

7) Increase in racial tension and violence,

8) Increasingly oppressive legislation to quell the above and an increasing use of physical restraint if legeslative restraint fails to achieve "Community sodding Cohesion"

9) Logarithmicaly increasing numbers of native Britons fleeing in vain to supposed sanctuary in less 'diverse' parts of the world.

10) Increasing depression and fatalism in those that are forced to remain.

11) Increaseing drug importation and use by host population, people trafficking, prostitution and child sex abuse.

12) Increase in electoral fraud until the point is reached when elections can be dispensed with.

13) Final ethnic cleansing of remaining native groups.

14) Replacement of the judicial system if it hasn't happened already.......Plenty more where these came from.....


How far into the future do you want to project?

mattyr2k8

at the moment, there is some situations in which people are better off on the dole than employed in £25k+ jobs thanks to the current benefits system. the benefits system needs a huge reform to stop this.

Kevin Adamson

The benefits system needs scrapping.

The Bear

The benefits system needs changing.

Let's start with the name then let's make people work for what they need and move on from there.

It will have to come and sooner rather than later.