British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > General Politics > British Politics & Other Parties


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
View Poll Results: Your Opinion On The 10 Points Below
I Agree With Them. Let's Legalise and Regulate Drug Use. 16 47.06%
I Agree With Most Of Them. 4 11.76%
I Disagree With Most of Them. 1 2.94%
I Disagree With All These Points. No Currently Illicit Drugs Should Be Made Legal 11 32.35%
Some Should Be Made Legal (i.e. Cocaine) But Others Should Be Illegal (Heroin etc) - (Your Choice) 0 0%
Not Sure/Don't Know 0 0%
In Fact, We Should Continue To Fight Drugs AND Even Clamp Down On Alcohol And Tobacco 2 5.88%
Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-02-2008, 06:17 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 859
Roland is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ranter View Post
The point is the numbers would be greatly reduced if the punnishments were more severe.
The house of commons could become one awful big prison
A little bit of history.

1633: Turkey:
Sultan Murad IV bans smoking and as many as 18 people a day are executed for breaking his law.

It dose not matter what the punishment a law will only be obied if it is felt to be a just one. Most people live their life in the belief that law should only come in to play if one mans action is directly responsible for another mans harm.

The nanny state is so disregarded and despised because most people feel their own body is their god given property to do with as they please.

Please answer me these two question.

what right have you to tell any one else what they can and can't do with their body?

Assuming you like a pint or a glass of wine what would your response be to the government baning alcohol?
Roland is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 05-02-2008, 06:18 PM   #12 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
tito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Pembrokeshire
Posts: 3,035
tito is just starting out
Send a message via AIM to tito Send a message via MSN to tito
Default

Roland, your hypothesis sums up the situation, but I do not believe it to be correct.

The real issue is, as long as there is a demand there will be a supply. Legality is irrelevant.
If Stalin couldn't stop it with his reign of terror, there is no way we can.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayn Rand
"Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good."
For life, Liberty and Prosperity
http://lpuk.org/
tito is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 06:25 PM   #13 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 31,083
Party: Libertarian Party
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

Do we really want to stop it anyway?

Some people manage to use drugs (of all kinds) quite responsibly. They hurt no one, pay for them, don't rob anyone and don't abuse anyone.

They city is full of drug users, as are the political classes. They are criminals as things stand, when I don't think they should be.

It all comes down to personal responsibility in the end. Some people will always be irresponsible, it's getting the numbers down to minimum levels and letting responsible people have a free, unhindered life that is the goal.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 06:33 PM   #14 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
tito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Pembrokeshire
Posts: 3,035
tito is just starting out
Send a message via AIM to tito Send a message via MSN to tito
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpdavies View Post
Do we really want to stop it anyway?

Some people manage to use drugs (of all kinds) quite responsibly. They hurt no one, pay for them, don't rob anyone and don't abuse anyone.

They city is full of drug users, as are the political classes. They are criminals as things stand, when I don't think they should be.

It all comes down to personal responsibility in the end. Some people will always be irresponsible, it's getting the numbers down to minimum levels and letting responsible people have a free, unhindered life that is the goal.
Of course, I have no intention of stopping it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayn Rand
"Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good."
For life, Liberty and Prosperity
http://lpuk.org/
tito is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 06:33 PM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 859
Roland is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tito View Post
Roland, your hypothesis sums up the situation, but I do not believe it to be correct.

The real issue is, as long as there is a demand there will be a supply. Legality is irrelevant.
If Stalin couldn't stop it with his reign of terror, there is no way we can.
I'm not saying that legalization would not come with problems but the issue will not go away.

Decriminalization as with Amsterdam leaves a problem of it still leaves the industry in criminal hands.

If legalized it would destroy much of the crime in this country. Muggings would drop significantly, so would burglaries and theft from cars. These three criminal activities are the worst in the realm of security and safety of the general public. These are not the activities of criminal gangs seeking an income from crime they are the activities of not particularly bright individuals desperate for cash.
Roland is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 06:37 PM   #16 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
tito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Pembrokeshire
Posts: 3,035
tito is just starting out
Send a message via AIM to tito Send a message via MSN to tito
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland View Post
I'm not saying that legalization would not come with problems but the issue will not go away.

Decriminalization as with Amsterdam leaves a problem of it still leaves the industry in criminal hands.

If legalized it would destroy much of the crime in this country. Muggings would drop significantly, so would burglaries and theft from cars. These three criminal activities are the worst in the realm of security and safety of the general public. These are not the activities of criminal gangs seeking an income from crime they are the activities of not particularly bright individuals desperate for cash.
I agree, I was just picking at your law-is-an-ass statement, I believe it is superfluous due to the more basic principle of supply and demand.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayn Rand
"Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good."
For life, Liberty and Prosperity
http://lpuk.org/
tito is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 06:38 PM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 859
Roland is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tito View Post
I agree, I was just picking at your law-is-an-ass statement, I believe it is superfluous due to the more basic principle of supply and demand.
Kind of like letting the free markets decide.
Roland is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 08:01 PM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Kevin Adamson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 888
Party: UKIP
Kevin Adamson is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland View Post
A little bit of history.

1633: Turkey:
Sultan Murad IV bans smoking and as many as 18 people a day are executed for breaking his law.

It dose not matter what the punishment a law will only be obied if it is felt to be a just one. Most people live their life in the belief that law should only come in to play if one mans action is directly responsible for another mans harm.

The nanny state is so disregarded and despised because most people feel their own body is their god given property to do with as they please.

Please answer me these two question.

what right have you to tell any one else what they can and can't do with their body?

Assuming you like a pint or a glass of wine what would your response be to the government baning alcohol?



Thanks for the History lesson Roland. What you failed to mention about our friend Sultan Murad was along with his banning of tabbacco he also banned coffee and alcohol. He was trying to suppress the population and knew he could have anyone killed he wished. He did so to 3 of is brothers and even tried a 4th on his deathbed at the age of 27 from ironic as it may seem alcholism.

Most people belive the law should only come into play if it effects others ? agreed, the drug users effect me when they leave their needles all over the grass down the local park ,When they shove a load of marching powder up thier nose in the pub which gives them a capacity to drink vast ammounts of alcohol and make it uncomfortable for everyone having a few pints.They effect me when my 75 year old Moher has her handbag stolen for a couple of quid so they can get thier next fix,you could say I am effected.,so no they cant do what they like with thier own bodies.


Whenever this subject comes up someone will say alcohol is a drug yes but most people can use alcohol without problem
Kevin Adamson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 08:02 PM   #19 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Westcountryman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Westcountry.
Posts: 5,922
Party: None
Westcountryman is just starting out
Default

Being the eternal 'fascist', I voted for: I Disagree With All These Points. No Currently Illicit Drugs Should Be Made Legal.
__________________
Manus haec inimica tyrannis ense petit placidam sub libertate quietam - "This hand of mine, which is hostile to tyrants, seeks by the sword quiet peace under liberty."
Westcountryman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 08:16 PM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Kevin Adamson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 888
Party: UKIP
Kevin Adamson is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpdavies View Post
Do we really want to stop it anyway?

Some people manage to use drugs (of all kinds) quite responsibly. They hurt no one, pay for them, don't rob anyone and don't abuse anyone.

They city is full of drug users, as are the political classes. They are criminals as things stand, when I don't think they should be.

It all comes down to personal responsibility in the end. Some people will always be irresponsible, it's getting the numbers down to minimum levels and letting responsible people have a free, unhindered life that is the goal.
Well I do,stop it that is . How can you say They hurt no one. What of the peasant farmers in some remote land.What of the mules who land at Heathrow with a package leaking into thier gut slowly and painfully killing them
What of the dealers using 15 and 16 year old boys armed to the teeth (lesser sentancing for kids carrying guns) to do thier dirty work.


No one ever got shot delivering a keg of beer.
Kevin Adamson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0