Britannist

Fantasy.

And you are the one verbally attacking me - using words such as "idiot" - more than once. We do not use language like that on this forum and you should bear that in mind.

You will notice that, at no point, have I used such terminology with you.

TonyG

I repeat:
It would appear that you have been warned about ad hominem attacks before. Why did you choose to start them again?

Veritas has no context in this or any other thread that we have been involved with. Your comments are vacuuous and irrelevant and show the depth that you are prepared to go to to avoid the issues.

You use ad hominem attacks ad nauseum.

And I couldn't care less whether you think me to be rude or not, you get only what you deserve. Behave like an idiot and I will treat you like one, in the forum or out of it.

__________________
If you don't think you can change the world, who do you expect to do it for you?

----

http://www.mercola.com/townofallopat...ofallopath.htm

TonyG

As you have posted 5.47% of all posts, that most likely includes you. Your willingness to resort to irrelevant ad hominem attacks merely supports the mathematics.

__________________
If you don't think you can change the world, who do you expect to do it for you?

----

http://www.mercola.com/townofallopat...ofallopath.htm

Britannist

Don't know what you are on about. Source/links please.

Yes it does. You stood as a Parliamentary candidate and got a paltry 0.9% of the vote in 2005 at Northampton South. Your incredibly low vote helps put the validity of some of your views here into perspective. It is also important that readers be made aware of the fact that you stood for a party (Veritas) which sought to damage UKIP - the party supported by the majority of posters on this forum. Why don't you want your low vote at Northampton South mentioned - are you ashamed?

And you still haven't answered the simple question I asked - which was if your vote may have been so low at Northampton South because the voters didn't like you. That's FIVE TIMES I've asked it now (in this thread and one other). But it appears you can't bring yourself round to answer it.

I tell the truth and never personally attack anyone in writing here. All I did is ask you the above question (above) and you seem to be very annoyed. I have made no "attacks". You are the one using derogatory and rude terminology against me.

Whether you like it or not, you are bound by the rules of this forum, which forbid personal attacks using offensive language (including of the kind you have used against me in the last hour or so in this thread).

Britannist

You're really scraping the barrel, now, metaphorically speaking. I've never made any personal attacks nor used abusive language against anyone on this forum. You, however, are guilty of getting quite personal against me over the last hour.

My offence - from your point of view - is having the 'audacity' to bring up your lamentable electoral performance as a candidate for a party out to damage UKIP.

I have done nothing wrong.

But you have personally attacked me just because I brought up your candidacy for a party which stood against UKIP candidates.

Britannist

This personal written attack (above) is clearly in breach of the rules of this forum. I shall treat it with the contempt it deserves.

TonyG

Which has precisely what to do with funding of the Labour Party?
Nothing. You resorted to cheap, irritating tactics because you had put your foot in your mouth, once again, and that is the only thing you could come up with to deflect the attention.

As for MY performance in Northampton South, you gleefully report my total vote after 3 weeks in the city with a party that was less than 3 months old.
Perhaps you should be reflecting on the performance put up by UKIP.
In 1997, 1159 votes.
In 2001, 1232 votes.
In 2005, 1032 votes.

Stunning, don't you agree? After 8 years and 3 elections just a paltry 1032 votes.
Perhaps you should be turning your attention to your own party's problems rather than pathetically bleating off topic about the number of votes I polled and trying to personalise it.

__________________
If you don't think you can change the world, who do you expect to do it for you?

----

http://www.mercola.com/townofallopat...ofallopath.htm

TonyG

You really do have an inflated opinion of yourself and UKIP don't you?
There are other reasons for standing in an election other than to damage your ego, you know.

__________________
If you don't think you can change the world, who do you expect to do it for you?

----

http://www.mercola.com/townofallopat...ofallopath.htm

Alex McKee

Guys, knock it off please.

TonyG

No problem for me Alex.

__________________
If you don't think you can change the world, who do you expect to do it for you?

----

http://www.mercola.com/townofallopat...ofallopath.htm