FredSucks

No Ceasefire in Labour's war against the English
by Richard Littlejohn - Daily Mail - 1 August 2006

Your response to Friday's column on record numbers of British citizens emigrating has been overwhelming. I can't say I'm surprised. There's a deep well of anger and frustration at Labour's venality, incompetence and cultural vandalism.

And it just keeps on coming. Since that column was published, more evidence has emerged of this goverment's fanatical determination to change irrevocably the face of England.

I say England specifically becuase although Labour's policies impact on other parts of the kingdome, it is England which is the main target and has taken most of the collateral damage.

Blair's government has been firing cultural Katyusha missles into Middle England since May 1997.

Only this weekend we leaned that the social engineers in charge of the national curriculum have removed the requirement on schools to teach British history.

Do you think this is going to stop teachers in Scotland, eulogising William Wallace or Robert the Bruce ? Or prevent Welsh pupils being taught about their Celtic heritage?

But in England, many schools are already neglecting our proud history - or else distorting the past to portray us as worthless, warlike racists whose only contribution to the world was to exploirt its ecology and enslave its aboriginal poeples.

In the Mail last week, Jill Parkin described how her children are bombarded with lessons about Islam, Sikhism and Hinduism but nothing about ther own culture.

That's par for the course in State schools today - and has been for years. A Friend of mine took his daughter out of a council-run primary school in North London when he discovereed that although she could sing the anthem of the African National Congress, she didn't know the words to God Save the Queen.

Now that they've got the thumbs-up from goverment, the Guardianistas running the educaton system will probably drop British history from the syllabus altogether.

From day one- or Year Zero as I christened it in the Mail back in 1997 - Labour has set out to destroy England as we knew it. While the Welsh, and the Scots have been given their own parliaments the IRA encouraged to take over Northern Ireland, the English have been subjugated, abused and ignored.

Mass immigration - legal and illegal - has transforemd parts of England in to foreign countries, Labour MP Frank Field compies it with Stalin's forced migration in the Ukraine.

Entire neighbourhoods are being ethnically cleansed - and it's the English who are geeting out of town.

Anyone who objects is slandered as a racist/xenophobe/Little Englander/BNP blah, blah, blah, But as I keep stressing, this is not about race, it's about numbers. It concerns earlier generations of immigrants and their descendents as much, if not more than anyone else - as this e-mail from reader Cassandrea Gosai illustrates graphically.

'As an ethnic minority English Woman living in Newham, East London, your article struck home. My husband (a British Indian from East African) and myself have seen our borough change beyond recognition in the last five to six years, Now I could be in Cairo, Pakistan or Yogoslavia.

'I hate felling like this, No, it isn't racism, this is a dreadful warning of what could happen - is happing to Britain - unless immigration is curbed.'

There are plenty more in that vein. The reason people are getting out are partly economic but primarily because they fell they no longer belong in their own country.

Even some Labour figures admit immmigretion is in meltdown. Home Office minister Jona Ryan admints that the arrrival of the next wave of Eastern Europeans - including at least 45,000 'undesireables' from Romania and Bulgaria - will cause 'chaos' What the hell dooes he think we've got already?

This is Labour's immigration policy. The plan from the off was to create as many new British citizens as possible in the shortest period of time in the hope that they would return the favour by voting Labour.

It's why leading Labour politicians argue for an ammenety for illegals - or 'undocumented' immigrants, as they prefer to call them, It's the quickest way of getting them on to the electoral roll.

This is all part of a twin-pronged attack on the natural Conservative majority in England, together with Gordon Brown putting hundreds of thousands more people into non-jobs on the public payroll and making millions of others dependent on welfare and tax 'credits'.

Labour has created a vast client state, to be cowed by the threat of losing their jobs and benefit payments. - or of deportation in the case of recent arrivals - should they ever be rash enought to vote Tory.

Ministers pretend that thy are going to get a grip on immigration, but only because they can't admit the plain and simple truth that everything is going exactly to plan.

And as for the hundreds of thouseands of British citizens seelling up and emigrating every year, so much the better, That's part of the plan too, They were only likley to vote Consevative, anyway.

So if you are contemplaing emmigration, there's no reason to feel guilty. It's what the Government wants. Just don't all rush at once.

John Carter

I reckon everyone English should move to Scotland. And then turn it into England #2.

That'll make their little plan backfire.

FredSucks

John put these words in order


Picnic Basket sandwich of short one

I guess you sat at the back a lot at school

John Carter

Ummm... ...You missed the word "a" out.

ENGLISH JEW

Can someone please tell me what a UKIP government would do to reverse this blatant discrimination.
Isn't the case that they'd keep things like Barnett just so they can retain the Union

__________________
Shalom

2nd Gerneration English & Proud

This is more than just Politics
Its PERSONAL

www.justiceforengland.com

Alex McKee

ROFL, English Democrat you need your head seen to. John's several times more intelligent than you, judging by the quality of your recent posts.

FredSucks

I can live with that, I don't tend to take much notice of Unionist Scots

ENGLISH JEW

i think some people are getting carried away with this.
knowone belittles what the people of ireland ( north and south ) did during various conflicts. as a group of nations we pay tribute to all of them every year but this doesn't mean that we have to be beholden to them for the rest of history and does not mean that we can not have political independence.
if this is the basis of UKIP's reasons for retaining the union then its feeble.
political independence is going to happen whether you like it or not.

__________________
Shalom

2nd Gerneration English & Proud

This is more than just Politics
Its PERSONAL

www.justiceforengland.com