![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
|
I was wondering why it was taking so long.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 29
![]() |
Was Veritas ever ALIVE? Really, this excuse for a political party must be going down as the most media-hyped and rapidly declining, new party, EVER to hit the hustings in modern political history. Kilroy's legacy is a disgrace and an insult to those that took the plunge INTO phpbb_what they thought was going to be a ground breaking movement.
Kilroy (through UKIP) was nothing more than a ploy to stop the BNP during the Euro 2004 elections. If anyone thinks that UKIP 'deserved' its 2 and half million votes in 2004 (allegedly due to the "Kilroy factor"), then they are really deluding themselves. The real standing of UKIP nationally was demonstrated in 2005 when their English vote fell by nearly 80%. Veritas simply served as yet another establishment attempt to shoot down UKIP, once UKIP served its anti-BNP agenda. Me thinks that Kilroy was effectively a stooge put in place to fragment and disorientate the far-right (that DOES include UKIP), to which he seems to have done an excellent job. The fact that he can barely bother to turn up to attend Euro Parliament meetings shows his relative contempt, not for the EU, but for the people that elected him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Paddling up 5hit creek.....
Posts: 7,704
![]() |
I'll agree para's one and three, but really para two could be a lot more succinct.
You could have just written "The BNP did not perform well in the 2004 Euro elections - it was all Kilroy's fault" And if you believe that, you'll believe anything. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bucks
Posts: 625
![]() |
Well Kilroy's been in the Labour party, UKIP (got a nice little earner out of that one, reduced the BNP vote), launched Veritas, destabilising UKIP in the process, splitting the vote in a number of constituences and then jacked it all in. Mission accomplished methinks. :wink:
Who's next I wonder. off to Northern Ireland to join the Orangemen? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6
![]() |
It was common knowledge that UKIP sudden rise of media prolific interest was simply there as a prevention method of the BNP.
Equally, we can't expect UKIPERS on here to buy that argument. because well...for the obvious reason of human nature. As a BNP member and UKIP member, i suspect there is a little 'visions of grandeur' on both sides. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Paddling up 5hit creek.....
Posts: 7,704
![]() |
Quote:
Please show how this was indeed 'common knowledge' - without referring to blogs of dubious value and with no basis in true fact beyond one persons opinion, which, of course, is very different to 'knowledge' - common or otherwise. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Welwyn Hatfield (Herts.)
Posts: 1,878
![]() |
Quote:
This argumentum ad populum is a favoured device of Gordon Brown's, so you're in pretty doubtful company. So it seems are we. Personally I wouldn't have BNP members in UKIP. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]