British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > General Politics > British Politics & Other Parties


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22-01-2006, 03:17 PM   #31 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,737
Party: Conservatives
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swivel Eyed Fanatic
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeuk
No doubt there would be a stunned silence in whatever yuppie wine bar you presumably frequent.
Been quite a while since i was in a wine bar......and I'm not a PC Fanatic I'm a Swivel Eyed Fanatic...... ....... but when you start on the road where people are "sought out and removed from every level of our society and lives." then where do you stop....? and where exactly do you remove these people to? The Gas Chamber?
Well I suppose he would like us to go back to the not-so-very-old days when discovery of such conduct meant instant dismissal from any position of responsibility.

It was certainly the case in Britain in the 1950s and 1960s. Why should a traditional view of the issue automatically brand one a Nazi?

Was this not your father's view of homosexuals? If not I'll bet it was that of your grandfather.
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 22-01-2006, 03:37 PM   #32 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Tom Wilde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London.
Posts: 2,887
Tom Wilde is just starting out
Default

I suspect it was the "sought out and removed" bit which gave SEF the heebie-jeebies.

It is true that in the past the discovery of such behaviour would lead to instant dismissal and (in some cases) prosecution. While I think that was wrong, I don't think we can call that a Nazi position as (just as MikeUK says) it was the traditional view in Britain up to the 1950s or so. However, I suspect that an awfully large number of blind eyes were turned to such behaviour if it wasn't too blatant, and that there was rarely much active effort to seek out and expose homosexuals. That is what distinguishes traditional attitudes in Britain from the approach of "sought out and removed from every level of our society and lives."
Tom Wilde is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2006, 07:58 PM   #33 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 30,829
Party: Libertarian Party
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

Little Britain have been doing this sketch for sometime. I wonder if Oaten would make a guest appearance.

Couldn't care less if he is gay.
I couldn't care less if he paid for sex (he is ugly enough).

I do care about him cheating on his wife and subjecting his kids to horrendus bullying now. He was right to resign!
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2006, 08:15 PM   #34 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
C_steam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Paddling up 5hit creek.....
Posts: 7,704
C_steam is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Why is he referred to as a "rent boy" and not a male prostitute?
Anthony - methinks you are thinking of the financial connotation of the word 'rent'.

Wrong!
C_steam is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2006, 08:26 PM   #35 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,737
Party: Conservatives
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

I actually feel a little sorry for Oaten, though he was obviously right to go.

So he was a hypocrite; but as La Rochefoucauld observes, 'Hypocrisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue'. If we must have Gay/Bi politicians (and we always have had them) I prefer them to stay firmly in the closet.

Meanwhile the News of the World, packed every week with every species of filth, rubs its hands in pharisaical glee.
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2006, 09:16 PM   #36 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,048
IceDragon is just starting out
Default

there must be plenty and I mean plenty of information which the media will not or dare not print about New Labour and the government, look at the Ore scandal for instance, in any other country it would be called favouritism and blatant nepotism.
IceDragon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2006, 10:15 PM   #37 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: south east
Posts: 196
extra ordinary is just starting out
Default

:arrow: To go for public office one must at least aim to have high moral fibre.

Do we choose to remove -paid for gay sex- from the no can do list ?
Myself I do not remove it -if it is happening now.
I think Mr Oaten can be forgiven for it -if it was years back.
what may trouble the public more is when we hide a terrible past and also if public safety and national security can be at jeopardy from blackmail - a real possiblity.


the news of the world says to us just how much power our media has.
extra ordinary is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2006, 11:14 PM   #38 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tees Valley Sub-Region
Posts: 331
Swivel Eyed Fanatic is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Wilde
I suspect it was the "sought out and removed" bit which gave SEF the heebie-jeebies."
100% right
Swivel Eyed Fanatic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2006, 11:37 PM   #39 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Anthony Butcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 10,139
Party: None
Anthony Butcher is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by extra ordinary
Do we choose to remove -paid for gay sex- from the no can do list ?
Myself I do not remove it -if it is happening now.
I think Mr Oaten can be forgiven for it -if it was years back.
I don't care what he does in his private life, it is none of my business... except where it reveals what I consider to be character flaws that make him entirely unsuitable for the job he was elected to.

Would he be voted back in if a by-election is called now? Would the Lib Dems even have included him as a candidate in the last election if they had known about his affair?

I assume that every candidate has to sign a declaration, as they do in UKIP now, stating that there is nothing hidden that could embarrass the party. Well, now we know that Mark Oaten lied to the selection panel. He wilfully set his own party up for an embarrassment.

Just like Ashley Mote did for UKIP.
Anthony Butcher is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2006, 12:15 AM   #40 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,737
Party: Conservatives
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

Yes but of course nobody is going to willingly confess to a secret affair, gay or straight.

He broke the 11th commandment and got found out. It's harsh but simple.

The Winchester constituency boundary is only 4 or 5 miles from where I am sitting and I have heard many good reports of Oaten. By all accounts he is an outstanding constituency MP.

If I were on the LibDem executive there I think, on balance, I might allow him another chance to fight the seat, but it has to be borderline.
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0